Long term cfs
Posted , 13 users are following.
anyone else had cfs really long term?
2 likes, 26 replies
Posted , 13 users are following.
anyone else had cfs really long term?
2 likes, 26 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
helen70967 june83698
Posted
Equally the support on forums such as this one is helpful.
karin65289 june83698
Posted
Did you know that two weeks ago the medical-powers-that-be offically changed the name of cfs to Systemic Exertion Intolerance Syndrome? What do people think of the new name, besides too long? Does it describe your symptons better?
georgeGG karin65289
Posted
dragontest karin65289
Posted
Hi Karin,
Just to clarify and from what I have read and understood.
Systemic Exertion Intolerance disease is placed in the WHO classification of disease, it will be a big step for us as the NHS uses WHO codes when we are diagnosed. Currently ME CFS and post-viral fatigue syndrome are all linked under G93.3 in Neurology.
The current version of the WHO classification system is due for republication with an updated version sometime this year (2015) We don’t know where this new SEID diagnosis will be placed, in the classification system or even if it will make the new WHO revision, so sadly nothing might change for the time being… but if it does it will be of great help in treatment of ME/CFS.
karin65289 georgeGG
Posted
I would appreciate it if you or anyone else would read the journals online and discuss your thoughts. I just checked access and if you type in the new name you should be able to access both journals.
Since medicine is founded on emperical principles they are going to insist on having criteria that can be replicated across that globe. It appears that the new set of critera may be more realistic, but then there will always be skeptics (doctors). When I meet such a doctor I have to keep myself from wishing that s/he will get ME/CFS- they really have no idea.
What do you think about having a new discussion on the new name / criteria?
dragontest
Posted
georgeGG dragontest
Posted
karin65289 dragontest
Posted
Do you think it would be useful to write a short review of the journal articles (IOM & Lancet) for this site, I'm fairly new here. I've had ME/CFS for 17 yrs and it's been a struggle to say the least.
karin65289 dragontest
Posted
dragontest karin65289
Posted
I think it would be worthwhile to write a short review on the articles.
However, I do wonder if the change in name and classification will affect the perception of people with ME in the general public eyes? Action for SEIS doesn't have the same feel as Action for ME?
I guess it’s the knock on effects that need due consideration?
The change in name could also confuse people a tad and it could just become an umbrella term for anything Fatigue related, which the term ME, doesn’t don’t you think?
It could all depend on how good of a PR job the WHO (World Health Organization) does at raising awareness of the disease and linking the past know names ME and CFS to the new one.
angela85346 june83698
Posted