Median Lobe Prostate Bladder Blockage Options?!?
Posted , 25 users are following.
So I have a median lobe that acts as a ball valve at the neck of my bladder.
I had no idea for many years what was going on. I even went to the emergency room a couple times.
I was holding 1000 CC's quite often.
One doc wanted to do the church right away. Another doctor taught me how to self catheterize. Another doctor wanted to prescribed Flomax. Doc in Germany wanted to do an ejaculate preserving "EP" TURP.
The median lobe seems to disqualify me for the Urolift. But a doc in Orange County, CA says the Urolift may indeed help me.
I'm young to be going through this. And my wife wants more kids. So I want to have antegrade ("forward shooting!") ejaculation.
Can anyone – as they say at the 12-step programs – share any experience, strength and hope with this situation?
Median lobe blocking urine flow. I need surgery but I want regular ejaculation.
3 likes, 56 replies
Chip_Bunker
Posted
Church = TURP!!!!!
roger100c Chip_Bunker
Posted
Roger
jimjames Chip_Bunker
Edited
In any event, it was obvious I had to do something, but I was unhappy with the surgical options, and retrograde ejaculation was also a big issue for me.
I ended up deciding to go on a program of self-catherization, basically to buy me time and wait until maybe a better procedure came along.
What happened was kind of a surprise both to me and my urolgists. After two years of self-catherization, my bladder has rehabilitated itself to the point where only have to cahterize maybe once per week, as opposed to six times a day when I started. If I am careful with fluid intake, I wouldn't even have to catherize once a week.
I'm not saying this is what you could expect with self catherization (CIC) but it was my outcome. Also, as a young man, I'm not suggesting CIC as a long term solution because hopefully there will be better surgical options down the pike. But consider it as one option as part of a "watch and wait" strategy, where you are waiting for a surgical procedure better than what is now being offered.
You mentioned "EP Turp", which I havre started a thread on but it's on "administrative hold" right now since I incuded a web site. Should be released any day now. Actually, EP Turp is new to me, and I just heard about it here, maybe from one of your earlier post.
I'm in the U.S. and am not aware of anyone who does it. That said, it sounds promising as it seems to have the benefits of TURP without the retrograde ejaculation. The figure the study gives is around 90%, meaning 10% will end up with retrograde ejaculation even with EP Turp. Certainly, much better odds than with regular TURP, or Button Turp, but you and your wife would have to ask yourself can you live with those odds as you want kids.
If you can't live with those odds, I suppose one back up is to have your sperm frozen before the operation, or simply wait until a procedure comes along that does not have any risk of retro. Several are out now, such as PAE and Urolift, but from reading here I personally would wait if I could, and again, CIC gives you the option to wait while it protects your kidneys by emptying your bladder completely any time you want.
If you do decide to continue with CIC, let me know as I can offer you some of my experience in that area.
I would also welcome any information you have on EP Turp, as there doesn't seem to be a lot of info out there even though the study was done ten years ago.
Jim
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
Here is the email I recently received from Germany:
"dear chip,
no worries, i totally understand your cautiousness, it is a tough decision, but i hope i can put things straight and out of the way for you.
1. either i will perform the surgery or my boss, who discovered this technique.
2. success rate hasn't changed, we perform this technique on almost all patients, because it also has a lower adverse events rate, however there are some boundaries reducing the success rate which are size of prostate, location of the enlargement, especially is it more the basis (good) or the apical (bad for success rate) parts of the prostate, the comorbidities of the bladder, that is why we perform urodynamics before surgery.
3. we perform this procedure approx. 200-300 times per year, we are only 2 surgeons which perform this technique. we use laser, as well as bipolary and monopolary resection techniques, also in combination.
our technique is getting very popular in germany, leading universities as well as high volume centers took this techniques in some cases over, also with a increased success rate.
4. yes, we had 2 patients this year from the states. and from a lot of other countries as well.
5. price for everything including all diagnostics, drugs, surgery and hospital stay (app. 4-5 days) will be 15000€.
6. we don't have a waiting list, we can perform the operation within 1-2 weeks.
why american doctors haven't taken over the technique i really don't know, because it doesn't use any new devices, it is just the interdisciplinary knowledge from andrology, sexual medicine, neurourology and surgery.
i'm waiting already for lecture invitation…just kidding.
i hope i could help you out with some of your questions.
best regards
saladin alloussi"
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
I posted some EP TURP info. But it is awaiting moderator approval.
I am VERY interested in self-cath. It scares me. But I believe it is a worthwhile option.
Do you have a favorite self-cath catherter? Do you sit down? Stand up? Hold penis at 45 degree angle? Or would that be 90 degree angle - haha? How do you keep from getting UTI?
Thank you VERY much!!!!
jimjames Chip_Bunker
Edited
First, thank you very much for the information on EP Turp. It's a procedure I had never heard of nor ever mentioned by my urologist, Fortunately, my self-catherization program (CIC) is going so well, I have the luxury of waiting, an in fact unless I have a regression sympton-wise, I may have achieved similar goals to surgery already.
For example, my International Sympton Prostate Score (I-PSS) went from 33 (severe) to 9 (mild/moderate) after 2 years of CIC. If you want to know more about the I-PSS scoring, search for my thread entitled
"What Is Your International Prostate Sympton Score?" In fact, I'll bump it up for you later but afraid to provide a link because every time I put a link in a post, it goes to "moderation" and doesn't appear until the next day or so. I also have another thread you should search for (I'll bump it up later as well so you can find it easier) entitled "Self Catherization. An alternative to Turp, Greenlight, HoLEP...?". It was from 7 months ago and covers a lot.
As to your questions and a general overview -- Yes, I have a favorite catheter after over a dozen of the more popular ones here in the States. I tried everything from red rubber, to vinyl, to a 4 or 5 different hydrophylic ones.
The one I like best (and it isn't even close) is Coloplast's Speedicath which is a single-use hydrophiic catheter with the coude tip. Coude Tip is very important if you have an enlarged prostate as it helps prevent any snagging as you pass over the prostate.
The size I started with was 14 French (14F) which is the typical starting size for most men. Once I got the technique down, I switched to 12F. As a general rule, you want to use the smallest size catheter that you are able to insert because a smaller diameter translates into less micro trauma. That said, I think if I started at 12F I might have been frustrated since it take slightly more skill since the smaller size means it's more flexible and therefore a little harder to handle, but only initially. I also should add that I have developed an in effect sterile "no touch" procedure where I only touch the plastic funnel end of the catheter and never the catheter itself. For this reason, I can actually do CIC quite quickly (without gloves or hand washing even) since the catheter itself is never touched. But again, this involves a little practice and is much easier with the 14F as opposed to the 12F which I use.
Basically I unwrap the speedicath at the top, and the nice thing with speedicath is that it's already coated and ready for immediate use by it's pre-packed fluid, so no need to break any packets.
Then I either wash or spray the head of penis and meatus. I have experimented with several different methods from providone iodine wipes to antispectic sprays.
Now, I gently pull my penis out and up (toward the ceiling) to straighten out the canal and give the catheter a straight shot going down. I do this with my left hand. At the same time I use my leftt thumb and forefinger to open up the canal by gently pulling the head of the penis out thereby exposing the meatus, but being careful to keep a sterile field by not touching the meatus. Then, with my right hand, I hold the plastic tip of the catheter and basically "dive bomb" (but very slowly) it into the opened ureretha. If I miss and the catheter touches anything but the meatus at the opening of my urethra (maybe one out of 50 times) I throw the catheter away and start over. But if it hits the urethral opening it will stop by itself a mm or so into the canal. Then I gently push the catheter in (again, only holding it by the plastic tip) and as I push it in I change the angle of the penis from straight up to more of a 45 degree (or even less) angle as I navigate through the plumbing and into the bladder. You may find two points of resistance in the process, the second when you push through the bladder neck.
It may sound complicated and time consuming, but the entire process for me, as described, takes less than one minute plus maybe another minute or so for the urine drain. I actually spend less time in the bathroom urinating with the catheter than I did before without the catheter with my on and off dribbling!
But again, the technique as described, is my own personal technique. I believe the stanard instructions have you feed the catheter in by hand which means you should wear gloves and frankly that hydrophillic is very slippery so not sure how easy that would be.
As for as UTI's go, I had problems the first couple of months due I think to system shock. I therefore highly recommend prophalactive antibiotics for anyone starting CIC, but unfortunately the stock answer from the doctors is "they aren't necessary". Ha!
After a while you may develop colonization, which basically means your urine will test positive for bacteria but you will have no symptons. This is normal and OK and you are NOT supposed to to treat this with antibiotics.
The way to actually avoid a real UTI is with careful technique, whether my "no touch" technique, or by the more standard technique of using gloves, or thorough washing, etc. The other way is to carefully monitor your bladder and catheter volume, at least in the beginning.
I've read it expressed two ways. The first is that if you catherize more than 400cc, then you should increase the frequency of CIC to get the catherized volume below 400cc. Or, if you catherize less than 100cc, then you should decrease the frequncy of CIC.
The other method which is more conservative says your bladder shouldn't be holding more than 400cc of urine at any one time. Therefore, assuming you have a natural void just prior to catherization -so let's say your natural void is 150cc, and you then right away do CIC an 300cc comes out.
Now going by the first formula, everything is good and you continue on your current daily frequency since your catherized volume was under 400cc. But going by the more conservative approach, your total bladder volume was 450cc and therefore if you had been catherizing 3X/day you might up it to 4X/day
In the beginning, I started with the less conservative approach and even then was cathing up to 6 times a day. Later, as my bladder started to regain elasticity, I went to the more conservative approach to keep bladder volume down at all time.
Now, my average void is 150-250 cc, and my PVR is usually between 50 and 150. And this is without CIC. So, since my total bladder never holds more than 400cc or urine, I was able to stop CIC completely except for every now and then when I might take in too much fluid, too quickly.
Hope I didn't lose you with the details, but you seemed interested in technique.
And so the important stuff doesn't get lost, I'll again repeat that for someone like yourself CIC has to advantages. First, it can buy you time until a procedure comes along you are 100% comfortable with, as opposed to picking the best of the worst available. And second, if your like me, your bladder may actually rehabilitate itself to the point where you may be able to stop CIC altogether.
Jim
jimjames
Edited
nealpros Chip_Bunker
Posted
Neal
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
Thank you soooo much!
Chip
Chip_Bunker nealpros
Posted
Success rate regarding which procedure?
There seem to be sooooooooa y options these days: 1. Self-catheterization. 2. Urolift. 3. Flomax. 4. TURP (ugh - not my favorite option) 5. The German "EP" (ejaculate preserving) TURP. 6. Green Lantern - oops - Green Laser. 7. Mini-TURP: which may preserve antegrade ejaculate. 8. Ignore the problem (not the best option). 9. HOLEP. 10. PAS? So - there are options. For that I'm grateful.
The web and sites like these are sooooo helpful.
I hope docs read this stuff.
Best,
Chip
jimjames Chip_Bunker
Edited
jimjames
Edited
Jim
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
That makes sense.
I haven't been "hands free perpindicular" since I was about 12 years old. Haha.
But I can do the parallel to the floor move. Ha.
I gotta laugh a little. This stuff is so awkward sometimes.
But I keep thinking of our poor aging brothers in the middle of the Amazon jungle. Maybe they use a stick to self-cath. Then they smile and continue hunting and gathering for a family of seven.
I'm so grateful to have some medical options. But I guess it depends on one's point of reference.
And I'm grateful for your share.
Cheers,
Chip
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
It will be a hit!!!! Huge potential audience. All us aging baby boomers.
jimjames Chip_Bunker
Posted
jimjames Chip_Bunker
Posted
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
nealpros Chip_Bunker
Posted
Neal
nealpros Chip_Bunker
Posted
Neal
Chip_Bunker nealpros
Posted
I believe Jim answered this.
EP TURP has a success rate over 90%.
But it would cost me $20,000.
Best,
Chip
nealpros Chip_Bunker
Posted
Neal
jimjames nealpros
Posted
Jim
nealpros jimjames
Posted
Neal
jimjames nealpros
Posted
As for myself, I'm not thrilled with any of the current options (including EP Turp) and that's why I self-catherize instead. But self catherization isn't for everyone either, so at some point many of us have to pull the trigger on one procedure or another, and the more information we have on everything that is available, the more informed decision we will make.
Jim
Chip_Bunker jimjames
Posted
I wonder of Charles Darwin would think the human male species will eventually have smaller prostates? In the year 4515?
nealpros jimjames
Posted
Neal
a80940 jimjames
Posted
Hope you are well. Do you have anymore info or heard about anyone having the EP Turp from Germany? I am considering it. I'm in the US. My prostate is now 120 and have a large median lobe. Had a PAE which shrank it a little but not enough.
deb2792 Chip_Bunker
Posted
Hi Chip. My 65 year old husband has just started to self cath (approx 2 weeks). He resisted taking this action as he was quite scared and anxious about the whole procedure, so much so that when the nurse showed him how to do it, they laid him on a bed because they thought that he was going to faint!
?Husband had prostatitus which prevented him from peeing at all - hence need for catheter. He found the first few days very uncomfortable - but he was not relaxed at all! Not surprised it was uncomfortable! However now 2 weeks in to cic and he has discovered a great deal more about his body. He now knows what works for him i.e. what position, when to change position, how to counter any resistance. He is also able to cic standing over the loo which is really much better than having to lie down. All I would say to you is GIVE IT A GO! My husband is a real wus when it comes to medical procedures and if he can learn how to do it and learn how to relax after just 2 weeks, then anyone can do it!
?We are considering our options at the moment and the cic is giving us time to do that without any pressure from our urologist who is a TURP maniac!
?I know that it is easy for me to say as a woman, but don't be scared! I live with the cowardly lion and he has coped really positively with cic.
Not had any UTI in 2 months and in moving from permenant catheter (fitted by nurses) to cic - for last two weeks. Hope this helps.?