Metal on metal bi-lateral THR- high metal levels in blood but scared of Revision

Posted , 5 users are following.

Has anybody been faced with metal hip revision?

My levels were high but have doubled.

I feel bad, can`t sleep have headaches and muscle fatigue.

I have read about the effects of toxicity but I am so scared of Revision.

Anyone been there and got through or faces the same decision?

0 likes, 7 replies

7 Replies

  • Posted

    HI Julie,

    I was in a similar situation to you. I had a hip replacement in 2008 due to an accident and in 2012 had to have it revised due to the fact that I had an incredibly high levels of metal ions in my blood and I had a pseudo tumour in my leg and dead tissue in my hip due to the metal on metal implant. I did not have any other symptoms though such as head aches etc.

    I was very worried about the hip revision operation, but everything turned out fine. I had to spend 6 weeks partially weight bearing after the operation as I had to have bone grafting in my hip but after that I recovered fairly quickly. I went back to my job as a school teacher 4 months after the operation and I managed to cope without any problems

    I have now retired as I am 62 but I do not have any issues. I can walk as far as I wish and do everything that I want to do. Ocasionally, I suffer from odd muscle aches if I overdo things but generally I am fine.

    I think that is important to have a surgeon who is experienced in hip revision operations.

    Please contact me if you have any further worries.

    Chrissie

  • Posted

    Speak to a lawyer they have recalls on these type of hip replacements and have this taken care of because your health is MOST IMPORTANT !!!! GOOD LUCK !!
  • Posted

    I agree with Jimmy.  If you're here in the US, there are many attorneys who are handling the recall cases.  Stryker is the biggest manufacturer they're suing or have sued.  DePuy is another company.  Just Google hip replacement recall.  You'll find lots of info.
  • Posted

    Hi Julie,

    I am recovering from a revision op due to metal on metal implant. (Iam in the UK). My blood cobalt and chromium levels were not all that high, but the surgeon told me that if the cobalt is significantly higher than the chrome, it was more likely that the implant would fail (he'd been to some conference in the US where he found this out).

    After the op, he said the implant wouldn't have lasted more than 6 months and if I had left it any longer it would have been much harder to fix. There was some bone loss and, like Christine, I had bone grafts and couldn't put weight on that leg for 7 weeks. It is now 12 weeks later, I am back at work though not full time yet and am still walking with one crutch. I am being quite cautious this time around!

    All last year I had quite bad fatigue, muscle weakness, brain fog - bad enough for me to need time off work sometimes and definitely a struggle when I was there. I don't know yet whether that was caused by the metal, it's a bit too early to say, though I suspect it was at least partly the cause.

    Any operation is scary, and revisions do seem to need a longer recovery for most people. But I would say go for it, the risks seem lesser than leaving metal in your body which is causing a reaction or possible long term damage. Have you had an MRI scan or anything, which might show what is happening in that joint?

    Good luck with whatever you decide.

    Jean

    • Posted

      Hi Jean,

      I live in the UK as well and had to have a revision operation. I was advised to contact a solicitor as apparently the dangers of metal on metal hip implants were known several years ago and warnings were issued. Just wondered whether you were given the same advice.

      Chrissie

    • Posted

      Hi,

      I can excuse the 2004 first metal hip, but I have read reports going back to 2009 when the surgeons were advised of the dangers. I had mine in Oct 2009( second hip) with no warning of complications. The hips are fine but my cobalt and chromium levels are at danger level. If you read Internet reports the side effects are scary- even linked to motor neuron problems, heart , renal, and neurological as well. Can`t face litigation but the surgeon who put them in is still insisting that the levels are OK. The NHS WILL DO IT,but I feel that he who put them in would be better tyo take them out.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.