Posted , 5 users are following.
With the recent disclosure that some blepth group members have found great relief of their symptoms by the use of antihistimines , is it possible that many posterior blepth cases could have been wrongly diagnosed and in fact the sufferers in fact had/have a chronic dry eye problem MGD? How or why could an antihistimine stop blepth if blepth is a nasty bacterial infection ? It's great that it is giving so much and near instant relief to some sufferers , but could it be that they are in fact allegy sufferers and if so could allegy testing help prove the point ?
What do you think ? Should posterior blepth sufferers have allegy tests to help dtermine their course of treatment ?
0 likes, 14 replies
over40 david24522
Posted
pamela48771 david24522
Posted
david24522 pamela48771
Posted
pamela48771 david24522
Posted
Carol_V david24522
Posted
fiona51388 david24522
Posted
david24522 fiona51388
Posted
fiona51388 david24522
Posted
fiona51388
Posted
david24522 fiona51388
Posted
over40 david24522
Posted
david24522 over40
Posted
over40 david24522
Posted
david24522 over40
Posted
Join this discussion or start a new one?
New discussion Reply