Monofocal iol set to plano
Posted , 3 users are following.
Hello, I will have implanted monofocal iol soon but am very confused about it. Please could someone explain this to me?
So, the lens can be adjusted to see only at once focus. What does it mean? What is a 'focus'? From 10 cm to 20 cm? Or from 10 cm to 1 meter? What is depth of field of this focus?
I have one more question: usually, in healhy eyes, the closer we go to zero, the best is the sight. I heard that with monofocal one eye is set to, for example, -2 or -3. What does it mean?
1 like, 17 replies
at201 adlibi
Posted
As an option, if one eye is set for far distance, the other eye can be set for the best focus at about 100 cm. This will correspond to requring a prescription of -1.0 D for far distance for that eye. The 2 eyes together will then be able to see well from about 65 cm to far distance. One will still need reading glasses. There is some adjustment required from the brain to deal with different prescription for the 2 eyes (called monovision), but most people can adjust to it (it took me less than 5 minutes to adjust to a much larger difference in the 2 eyes when I tried monovision many years back with contact lenses. This will be my recommendation if you will like to use the monofocal lenses only.
One can even have one eye set for far distance and the other one for reading (corresonding to about 40 cm and a prescription of -2.5D). I have that combination using a Symfony lens for distance and a monofocal lense for reading with very good day time vision at all 3 distance ranges (but have the night vision issue associated with the Symfony lens). However, if one uses that combination with the monofocal lenses, the lack of good vision at the intermediate distances may be a problem.
The depth of the field of focus depends on the amount of light. In good light, a lens set for far distance will provide reasonably good focus from about 200 cm and beyond, a lens set for 100 cm will provide a reasonably good focus from about 66 cm to 200 cm, and a lens set for 40 cm will provide a reasonably good focus from about 33 cm to 50 cm. All these numbers are based on having minimal amount of astigmatism in the eyes.
adlibi at201
Posted
thank you very much indeed! My grandad has two near monofocal, he need glasses for watching tv but he goes around in the house without wearing them. how is that possible? the bluriness is not that strong? I'm myopic, so used to see dreadfully far away, already from 50-60 cm and beyond. I have also keratoconus and irregular astigmatism.
at201 adlibi
Posted
As an example. before my cataract surgery, when wearing my contact lenses with one eye set for far distance and the other one set for reading, my intermediate vision was fine for day-to-day activities and I never wore glasses. The only time I missed having good vision at the intermediate distances was at some unusual situations, such as trying to read captions from about 70 to 100 cm away next to paintings in a museum. So, it all depends on your life style as to how good a vision you need to have at the intermediate distances.
My suggestion will be for you to either have the combination of far / intermediate or intermediate / near focus for the 2 eyes, depending on whether you would prefer to use glasses for reading or for driving / watching TV.
adlibi at201
Posted
Thank you! Tell me something please that I really don't understand: what is the difference between wearing glasses for far away when you are myopic and still have your own natural lens and wearing distance glasses when you have monofocal for near vision?
at201 adlibi
Posted
adlibi at201
Posted
1) How is the level of bluriness for the not corrected distance by monofocal iols?
2) If I have implanted monofocal for close, wearing glasses for distance, lets me to see close even with glasses on? Or I must put them down?
at201 adlibi
Posted
Also, in that case, if you were wearing glasses to see at a distance, you will have to put them down to read unless the glasses were bifocal, trifocal, or varifocal.
I really think that most people can adjust to small differences in the prescription power for the 2 eyes (i.e.micro-monovision). So, you should seriously consider one of the following 2 options:
1. Have one eye set for far distance and the other eye set for the best focus at about 100 cm. This will correspond to requring a prescription of 0D and -1.0 D for far distance for the eyes. The 2 eyes together will then be able to see well from about 65 cm to far distance. One will still need reading glasses.
2. Have one eye set for reading at 40 cm and the other eye set for the best focus at about 67 cm. This will correspond to requring a prescription of -2.5D and -1.5D for far distance for the eyes. The 2 eyes together will then be able to see well from about 35 cm to 100 cm. One will need glasses for distance (the uncorrected distance vision will be about 6/20 in the metric system).
adlibi at201
Posted
at201 adlibi
Posted
adlibi at201
Posted
Like this, distance from keyboard and from score:
http://www.globalgiants.com/archives/fotos19/SteinPiano-01.jpg
at201 adlibi
Posted
Seems like a distance of about 50 cm, which corresponds to a prescription of about -2.0 D.
If you want to be able to do that without glasses, you can set both eyes to the best focus at that (or close to that) distance. However, my suggestion will be the option 2 above; viz, "Have one eye set for reading at 40 cm and the other eye set for the best focus at about 67 cm. This will correspond to requring a prescription of -2.5D and -1.5D for far distance for the eyes.The 2 eyes together will then be able to see well from about 35 cm to 100 cm."
adlibi at201
Posted
I heard many people have troubles with monivision, with one eye far and the other near. Is that mini-monovision more natural?
I have one more question please: I have irregular astigmatism: is toric iol a good solution? I don't want to have aberrations, halos, glare and so on with a toric lens. How is about that?
at201 adlibi
Posted
A Toric IOL can take care of regular astigmatism, but not irregular astigmatism. Thus, that will be of no benefit to you.
If the irregular astigmatism is really bad, one can have LASIK enhancement done after the cataract surgery, but if you have been living with it all these years, that is probably not that bad.
adlibi at201
Posted
at201 adlibi
Posted
adlibi at201
Posted
at201 adlibi
Posted
As a side note, the determination of the IOL power can be off by about 0.5D even for people with no irregular astigmatism. So, it is good to have one eye done first and wait for 2-3 weeks for its vision to stabilize before selecting the best power for the second eye. This will be even more important in your case.