PAE and Better Sex
Posted , 7 users are following.
After reading through much of the PAE threads I noticed that a number of people who have had the procedure reported a much better sex life. I was wondering if this was because they were able to stop taking drugs like Tamsulosin (Flomax) or if it was because it was a secondary side effect of the prostate shrinking. Hopefully those who had PAE can expand on this, and also tell us specifically how their sexual performance was enhanced and if things changed right away or gradually over time.
Jim
0 likes, 9 replies
william79680 jimjames
Posted
david53853 william79680
Posted
william79680 david53853
Posted
i had mine done as part of a clinical trial at UNC Chapel Hill NC. Thus it was all free. I have heard that they charge $6500 if done outside of the trial, but I cannot confirm that for sure.
caringbah jimjames
Posted
mike588 jimjames
Posted
As far as a physical reason apart from stopping all the bad drugs, I very much doubt it. Someone suggested that some blood that is blocked to the prostate will now go to Penis, I find that "hard" to believe...lol
caringbah mike588
Posted
In the few days after my PAE I noticed my penis was much fuller than normal. Why does a penis get fuller? It's because it's got more blood in it.
I discussed this this with my interventional radiologist and he said it stands to reason that if the prostate is getting less blood than normal (it's been embolised) that blood has to go somewhere. The penis is very close so why not there?
Nobody knows yet but it is as good an explanation as any. It only happens for about 30% of patients.
anthony2858 jimjames
Posted
I had the Urolift done July 2015 and now my doc has me on 2 Tamsulosin a day and self catching, My sex drive is definatly down, and my erections are pretty much just in the mornings. I am 57 and have always had a very good stamina with sex as well as very satisfactory frequency. So I think the Tamsulosin is taking a toll on all of that. Thanks for the great question!
jimjames anthony2858
Posted
So, I can understand why a doc puts people on Tamsulosin as part of a watch and wait strategy. And I can see why people self-cath as either part of a watch and wait strategy or for even longer term.
But it doesn't make much sense to me to do both. Since self cathing allows you to completely empty your bladder any time you want it, what's the point of the Tamsulosin? So, maybe you might have to cath one or two more times a day to compensate, but wouldn't that be worth dropping Tamsulosin and all its negattive side effects?
I have heard this situation once before here, but I never got a convincing reason why, other than "that's what my doctor said". For me, by itself, that's not a good reason.
Jim
SextonBlake jimjames
Posted
Morning Jim,
I have just had PAE in London so this is of interest.
I had a laser turp 11 years ago and regrowth occurred.
PAE was selected because I didn't want to risk side effects from the Turp second time around.
The idea of improvement in Sexual function is obviously appealing.
I wondered about blood supply diversion, but also the possibility of deflection of blood supply vessels.
All of the blood vessels can be seen during PAE. I just presume that no-one has thought of looking to see if any of them are getting pinched or pressed.