PCAT-14 could reduce the need for biopsy or removal of the prostate
Posted , 3 users are following.
Found an article today on Yahoo. Hope it soon come to reality.
Study finds marker of aggressive prostate cancer
The level of a specific molecule present in prostate tumors is an indicator of whether the cancer is aggressive and likely to spread, according to new research from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1450190541376-1'; }); The study, available online in the journal European Urology, may inform future clinical tests that help doctors decide how best to treat prostate tumors. Many men with prostate cancer have slow-growing tumors that do not require surgery, radiation or other treatments that can leave patients impotent, incontinent or both. But doctors often have difficulty telling the difference between these indolent tumors and those that will prove to be more aggressive.
"Distinguishing patients who have indolent versus aggressive prostate cancer is probably one of the biggest challenges in the field," said senior author Christopher A. Maher, an assistant professor of medicine. "Our study suggests that levels of a molecule called PCAT-14 may be a marker of whether the tumor is likely to be aggressive, helping doctors decide whether to intensify a patient's treatment."
The scientists measured levels of PCAT-14 from prostate tumors after their surgical removal. Maher said one of his group's goals is to design a noninvasive method, such as a urine test, to make the same measurement.
The scientists found that levels of PCAT-14—an RNA molecule—were elevated across 180 prostate cancer patients treated at three different institutions. Analyzing another 910 tumor samples from patients with known treatment outcomes, the researchers also showed that the patients with more aggressive tumors, perhaps surprisingly, had lower levels of PCAT-14. Patients with slow-growing tumors had higher levels of the molecule. That may seem counterintuitive, but according to Maher, the data suggest that high levels of this RNA molecule suppress tumor spreading. So when levels decrease, that suppression is lost and the cancer cells are free to metastasize.
Past work by Maher and his colleagues has identified PCAT-14 as one of 121 similar RNA molecules strongly associated with prostate cancer. Many of the other PCAT molecules they found associated with a variety of cancers, including prostate, but PCAT-14 was specifically found only in prostate cancer. RNA is similar in structure to DNA and serves various functions in cells, especially in turning genes on and off.
"We looked at all similar RNA molecules in these prostate tumors," Maher said. "Only PCAT-14 was consistently altered in all prostate cancer patients and able to distinguish indolent and aggressive disease."
Working with aggressive prostate cancer cells in the lab, the researchers showed that dialing up levels of PCAT-14 appeared to build up barriers to cancer spreading, slowing the growth and mobility of these normally aggressive cells. Likewise, dialing down levels of PCAT-14 appeared to remove barriers to spreading, making these cells even more aggressive, increasing the number of cells and their ability to move.
Maher and his colleagues also showed that low levels of PCAT-14 were associated with poor response to androgen deprivation therapy, a hormone-based treatment for prostate cancer that is less toxic than chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Prostate tumor growth often is driven by male hormones, such as testosterone. Depriving prostate tumors of hormonal fuel can slow or stop growth, but some tumors grow even in a state of hormone deprivation.
"We suspect that PCAT-14 may be a good predictor of whether patients will respond well to androgen deprivation therapy," Maher said. "Low PCAT-14 means the cells are likely to grow and spread even when deprived of androgens."
With improving diagnosis and treatment in mind, Maher said the development of a noninvasive test to measure levels of PCAT-14 could reduce the need for biopsy or removal of the prostate. This is an advantage of identifying a molecule that is only present in the prostate, according to Maher. In theory, if this molecule can be detected in a urine sample, for example, there would be no question it would indicate a problem with the prostate rather than some other organ, such as the kidney or bladder.
0 likes, 4 replies
aksns61 viet78904
Posted
Roger2Dodger viet78904
Posted
I didn't read all of your article, but this might be related somewhat to your article.
I had my pathology remains tested at prolaris. Prolaris is a prognostic test developed by Myriad Genetic Laboratories, which directly measures tumor cell growth characteristics for stratifying the risk of disease progression in prostate cancer patients. The 46-gene expression signature includes cell cycle progression genes selected based upon correlation with prostate tumor cell proliferation:
low gene expression associated with a low risk of disease progression
high gene expression associated with disease progression
Prolaris testing combines traditional risk factors with a molecular assessment of the aggressiveness of an individual patient’s cancer to deliver a more informed risk assessment. So you and your patient can be confident when choosing a course of management.
My test came back in the non agressive range. I elected to go for active surveillance , Instead of treatment. I will be re evalated in November.
viet78904 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Roger,
Thanks. It looks like two are in the opposite way. In the article, higher of PCAT-14 (an RNA molecule) builds up barriers to cancer spreading, slowing the growth and mobility of these normally aggressive cells an vice versa while in Prolaris testing, lower gene expression associated with a low risk of disease progression.
The question is there a relationship between RNA molecule & gene? If RNA = 1/gene then there is a case. Just a thought.
Roger2Dodger viet78904
Posted
Your explaination makes sense. The prolaris score I recieved does not coincide with my biopsy, the (Gleason score). The prolaris score shows or indicates a lower score of the actual Gleason. That is how it was explained to me by the medical team at Prolaris. However, One cannot wonder which one is right. I chose to take the non agressive score. In a way it is a second opinion.
So, I agree with your explainton.