PI RADS score of 4
Posted , 19 users are following.
I recently had a 3T MRI and the score was 4. There is a 6mm lesion on the left apex. Of course they are pushing for a biopsy but I'm not going to have one due to my other health issues.
Does anyone have any good statistics on what percentage of subsequesnt biopsies are positive for PCA with a score of 4 , the numbers I've found are around 37%...which doesn't seem much better than a blind biopsy..
0 likes, 48 replies
n-mac jwrhn1951
Posted
It appears that your numbers are way off. Any credible MRI radiologist report should lay out in a legend/key toward the bottom exactly what percentage possiblity of cancer corresponds to each score value (1 - 5). Per the MRI radiologist report I received for the MRI I had taken late last year, a score of 4 corresponds to 75% likelihood of being malignant. Moreover, it is ridiculous to discount it as being blind because clearly it was not. In your own words, it did not blindly score the entire gland, but instead it focused in and found a 6mm leasion (not a innocuous pimple!) and scored it as a 4 out of 5 (75% likley) as positive for cancer.
I strongly recommend that you stop playing mind games or trying to fool yourself, and instead go have a high accuracy image focused biopsy performed ASAP by the nest urology oncologist that you can find. Wishing you the best of outcomes.
rolf61809 n-mac
Posted
last year I had a pi-rads score of 3 with indications of a couple lesions in the intermediate Zone. neither of the two urologists I saw indicated that it meant a 60% chance of serious cancer, while you seem to indicate that a score of 4 is a 75% chance (well it would actually be 80%). my first urologist even declined to do a Fusion biopsy because he said the pi rads of 3 wasn't serious enough to Warrant it. my second opinion urologist said the fusion biopsy was warranted but it had been so long since the pi rads that he would want to do another one first before proceeding to a fusion biopsy. the first urologist indicated that he just wanted to do a regular blind biopsy without targeting the intermediate Zone at all which I thought was crazy. so I still haven't made the biopsy decision. my PSA a year-and-a-half ago was six then it went to 7 then it dropped to 3 then up to 5 where it is now. I'll admit that the chance of infection or sepsis is somewhat of a deterrent in my decision to get a biopsy.
rolf61809
Posted
LonelyPoet n-mac
Posted
I just had an MR Prostate WO Contrast. The report says under finding for the prostate measures 4.7 x 3.8 x 3.8 cm in size, with a total volume of 35 cc.
Lesion 1: Size 0.8 x 0.8 0.8
T2 Score:4
DWI score :4
Also it says there is a suspicious right peripheral zone prostate nodule, with nonspecific short segment abutment of the capsule.
PI-RADS: 4 - High
I just saw the results on the EMR and I know my Urologist is going to want a biopsy which is fine once he gets this report, but I'm so anxious right now for information about this. Anything anyone that knows. Possibly cancer? And if so does it have stages like other cancers?
al93638 LonelyPoet
Posted
Spinch. ,Kale , with pomagrande blend it up with water drink it and stay away from sugers as much as possible, it will change the way you think about food but for the better and what ever the results hopeing for the best, there are treatments out there
You will probably die of other things and not this , but get second and 3 opinions before take any steps foward good luck god bless you but do change way of eating , we are all here to help you thru this you are not alone ,
richard98806 jwrhn1951
Posted
david41094 jwrhn1951
Posted
Pepasan jwrhn1951
Posted
I can't imagine what other health issues would stop me from consenting to a bopsy, if it was recommended!
jwrhn1951
Posted
Thanks for the replies. I get my care from the VA in the US, they use the PI RADS v 2.0 scoring system. There was not any percentage interpretation of the scoring just this:
Impression:
6 mm nodule at the left apex.
PI-RADS 4: High (clinically significant cancer is likely to be present)
My PSA has averaged 9 plus or minus 2.0 for the last 5 years. They started me on Finasteride last October for urinary retention and it dropped the PSA to 5.0 which supposedly indicates a less agressive cancer if present. I understand the PSA needs to be doubled when taking Finasteride but a 10 is pretty much in line with where it has been for years.
Although as noted the probability of maligancy may be as high as 75%, the numbers I've seen on subsequent biopny are that detection rate of PCa is only between 37% and 56%. My point and question is, why if the probability is 75% are biopsies only positive in 1/3 to 1/2 of the cases in men with pi rads of 4?
I've made my treatment choices based on what works best for my particuliar circumstances don't want to turn this into another biopsy/not to biopsy discussion just curious if anyone has run across any current info on PI RADS....
n-mac jwrhn1951
Posted
It looks like you don't get it, or want to get it. I'm done. Good luck!
barney34567 jwrhn1951
Edited
2. PIRADS 4 is what I had and is very suspicious for cancer.
3. I had and suggest you follow with a transperennial ultrasound guided MRI biopsy. This involves an ultrasound machine guiding the biopsy needles using the data from the MRI. This means that the needles are not being shot into you blindly in the vain hope they will strike the cancer. Instead they are shot at the area where cancer is likely to be present.
4. A transperennial biopsy is also proven to be safer inasmuch as it has a FAR lower risk of infection than the very common transrectal biopsy. In my case, other than some red pee for a few days and mild sensitivity, I endured this type of biopsy very well.
5. With a PIRADS 4 report, assuming it authored by a prostate imaging specialist, I would not wait. I would go ahead with the biopsy ASAP.
rolf61809 barney34567
Edited
jwrhn1951 barney34567
Posted
I get my care at a VA medical center affiliated with a large well regarded medical school affiliated with an international cancer institute. I would suppose the MRI was read by a resident and confirmed by a specialist, I'm quite confident they have some of the best in the business involved.
It seems the PI RADS is pretty good at finding no cancer and eliminates the need for unnessary biopsy's but like most of the PCa diagnostic tools available today it is not very good at distinguishing between an agressive cancer that needs immediate treatment in most cases and one that is not aggressive. Hopefully in a few years it won't be such a crap shot.
In my particular circumstnces a biopsy dosen't make sense as it won't effect my ultimate treatment choice, I'll wait until I'm symptomatic before starting any form of threatment. I do think the transperennial approach sounds mych better than the TRUS biopsy.
Not only are there many divergant opinions and treatments out there the fact is that every individual reacts differently to the prospect of PCa..some say its they way you are wired. For me, I value quality of life in the next few years far than any extension of life span which will do me no good anyway...
barney34567 rolf61809
Posted
barney34567 jwrhn1951
Posted
But I disagree with your comment that everyone reacts differently to PCa. The key is to identify if you have a high or a low grade PCa. There is no guaranty that even a high grade cancer will spread very quickly. What the literature shows is that the higher the Gleason score, the greater the propensity for the PCa to spread.
I would not waste time or money with another 3T MRI if the last one was performed in the last few months.
I would go ahead with an ultrasound guided fusion transperenial biopsy to clarify the picture ASAP with a PIRADS 4.
If however you insist on nor racing ahead with a biopsy then I humbly suggest you get a PSMA PET CT scan. This will show where the PCa throughout your body and will be useful for you to get a handle on the question as to whether the PCa has speead beyond the prostate.
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
Just had an MRI scan of the prostate. At follow up consultant casually said I’m surprised you are PI-RAD 5 with such a low PSA! Didn’t have a clue what that meant just remembered it so I could google it afterwards! He didn’t seem at all concerned so at the time neither was I? I’m booked in next week for a MRI Fusion Transperineal Targrted Biopsy Oct 5th 2017! After reading the likely hood of this being clinically significant cancer (or am I getting mixed up with Gleason Scale?) should I be worried or is it common the PI-Rad 5 can mean nothing at all? Any advice please. I’m not scared just need to do what’s best! I’m 50 years old! Is that young?
barney34567 michaelrobin34
Posted
barney34567
Posted
I should add two things.
1. PIRADS is a very good guide to what's going on. If the images were reported on by a specialist in prostate images then you most likely have PCa. And your decision to get a transperennial u/s guided biopsy is good. At 51 I had a PIRADS 4 revealed in a MRI and then had the same biopsy you are having.
2. The comment on low PSA by the consultant shows that he knows diddly squat. All world class urologists know that the PSA number itself, high or low, is irrelevant. What is relevant is the change over time in the PSA. Regardless of the number, if it doubled in less than a year then cancer should be staringky considered. Taken with the PIRADS results, I think the biopsy you will have is the best diagnostic tool there is .
Good luck.
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
Cheers
Michael
barney34567 michaelrobin34
Posted
Hi again. Just to ease your fears, I was ill with a nasty cold. Nothing whatsoever to do with PCa.
I suspect your urological surgeon will give you antibiotics to take 1-2 days before the biopsy. And I think for a few days later.
Hopefully you will be in the clear with the biopsy. If not, then at least you will be very well armed with all the facts as to the stage of your disease. And don't forget, you can come in here to ask questions at any time.
This place is full of those, like me, who have been where you are and can share tips on what to expect etc.
Good luck.
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
Thank you Barney for your advice, kind words and well wishes! Glad you’re well. I will be back to ask questions next week and let you know the outcome too!
Cheers
Michael
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
barney34567 michaelrobin34
Posted
Sorry for the late reply, but I am having difficulties accessing the forum for reasons unknown.
You ask if the procedure is painful.
The procedure is not a walk in the park. It is invasive and, In my case, required general anaesthesia (with all the risks that come with that).
But saying that, I had no pain post-biopsy that could not be managed well by meds. And the pain lasted a couple of days at the most.
Don't be shocked if, for a few days afterwards you feel tender sitting down and your urine will go red.
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
Thanks my friend. Well wish me luck. It's happening today and I'm having a general so all good there!
Cheers Barney
Regards Michael 🤞
michaelrobin34 barney34567
Posted
cjc99 michaelrobin34
Posted
Hello Michael,
Stressed spouse here. Hubby just had MRI with PIRAD 4 result. Consult for biopsy is scheduled. Question for you if you don't mind.....I think that a rectal approach is planned for him, however I feel from what I have read and from my limited knowledge the perineal approach seems to make more sense in that it is "cleaner" and also more accurate in getting to the right spot. Do we push for that type of biopsy?
Can you tell me about the recovery? And what happens next?
Many thanks,
cj
rolf61809 cjc99
Posted
My advice would be to push for the transperineal biopsy if it's available in your area, even if your urologist pulls a long face on you. It seems rather difficult to get in the USA while it's quite common in Europe in Australia.
al93638 michaelrobin34
Posted
michaelrobin34 al93638
Posted
My final result is all very reassuring despite my initial scare. There are many people on here who argue about the unnessary invasive procedures after an imaging results high up the scales and my experience would agree with that. However having the Fusion Targeted Trasperinneal biopsy come back negative that's the most conclusive results. Still doesn't explain my high Pirads and elevated PSA! That's where the confusion starts for many of us. Good luck for the 15th
al93638 michaelrobin34
Posted
al93638
Posted
michaelrobin34 al93638
Posted
Don't be scared remember this is mostly treatable, yes the urologist said pirads can be easily misinterpreted by the radiologist, which is something that needs to be addressed urgently in my opinion. Also he believed my high pirads to be caused by benign inflammation of infection. Especially as biopsy was clear. You'll be fine my friend, I'm sure! Kep me posted
al93638 michaelrobin34
Posted
al93638
Posted
al93638
Posted
barney34567 al93638
Posted
By the way, your English is just fine.