PIP & ESA ASSESSMENTS.
Posted , 5 users are following.
ESA, 0 points for mobility v PIP 8 points for mobility. (odd in it"s self, can"t get my head round it) Then overturned by tribunal to award 15 points for mobility on ESA, but then, 8 points taken away for PIP mobility, because i reported a worsening condition. What the dickens is going on?
0 likes, 11 replies
katrina020506 gettingonmypip
Posted
Obviously didn't listen to a word I've said in medical
pollmadoll64 gettingonmypip
Posted
les59996 gettingonmypip
Posted
katrina020506 les59996
Posted
les59996 katrina020506
Posted
anthony97723 gettingonmypip
Posted
ESA doesn't have a mobility component so you probably were awarded 0 points on the grounds that the Health Care Professional/DWP Decision Maker thought you were capable of work. PIP is worked out on different criteria and at some point you were awarded 8 points (standard rate) mobility. I think you are confusing the 2 and that’s why you are finding it hard to understand their decision.
Simply put the Tribunal looked at the evidence and decided the HCP/DWP ESA decision was wrong and overturned the 0 points and awarded you 15 which is enough to put you in the Support Group.
However, for whatever reason they also ruled that the 8 points for PIP mobility was wrong and took that away. So it would seem you gained by being awarded ESA Support Group rate (£109.30) but lost out on the PIP mobility at standard rate (£21.80pw)
I haven’t seen the evidence so I don’t know if this was fair or correct decision but it is possible for the Tribunal to come to that conclusion.
gettingonmypip anthony97723
Posted
anthony97723 gettingonmypip
Posted
The only thing I can think of as to why the 2 decisions contradict themselves is the use of 'aids'. The WCA is clearly mentions that you have to cover the test distance WITHOUT the use of an aid.
In PIP it is different in that someone who can cover that distance using an aid i.e. walking stick, even a mobility scooter (providing they can get on and off on their own) would deemed able to cover the distance.
So at a guess i assume the Tribunal thought you could cover the distance with an ‘aid’ (no PIP) but couldn’t cover the distance without an ‘aid’ (hence ESA Support Group)
gettingonmypip anthony97723
Posted
anthony97723 gettingonmypip
Posted
Strange you mention another HCP/Assessor who at the assessment talked more about themselves than you the potential claimant. It's amazing how many times this happens wonder if its a 'trick of the trade' so to speak?
gettingonmypip anthony97723
Posted