PIP Mobility opinions needed
Posted , 5 users are following.
Hi there. First of all I should mention that I am only 27 years old. I went for my PIP assessment yesterday to be assessed for mobility. Last year I was awarded enhanced daily living. I suffer from a condition called Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) and in April 2016 I had surgery to remove a tumour on the hearing nerve and on the balance nerve on the left side. The balance nerve had to be removed due to excessive damage caused by the tumour along with the hearing nerve. In 2008 I had the same surgery on my right side. However I had an ABI (Auditory Brainstem Implant) installed on my left side. This has left me completely deaf with no balance.
I have to use a stick to walk because I am so unsteady when walking and prone to stumbling or falling over without it. I am unable to travel more than a few meters without getting dizzy or breathless and I am unable to lift heavy object for the same reason.
I would love to know peoples opinions on whether I am eligible for PIP mobility and what rate.
Thank you.
0 likes, 19 replies
claire2408 craigzeth
Posted
anthony97723 claire2408
Posted
It is possible to get Enhanced Mobility by scoring enough points on the "Planning and following Journeys" descriptor alone. Also Enhanced Mobility can be awarded with a combination of point scoring from both descriptors.
Also the people you refer to might still get their mobility car under the old DLA rules where the distance which people can walk is irrelevant providing they are in severe discomfort when walking. With respect no-one but that person will know if they are in severe discomfort. Also they would have needed to provide medical evidence as the DWP don’t hand out mobility cars on a whim that is a gold plated urban myth.
Without knowing the full circumstances no-one should be judging others in order to justify their own self interest. We the disabled get enough judgemental rubbish without dishing it out ourselves.
claire2408 anthony97723
Posted
anthony97723 claire2408
Posted
This feeds into the Government narrative about those claiming disability benefits as being cheats and scroungers.
None of us is medically trained or have a full insight to other individuals’ circumstances and what may seem at first sight to be wrong can be fully explained when the full history of that person’s physical and mental health is known.
When giving out advice or opinions I would just ask to keep clear of that kind of narrative. Firstly it only adds to urban myths and secondly it is totally irrelevant to someone else’s circumstances.
gettingonmypip craigzeth
Posted
anthony97723 craigzeth
Posted
I understand your condition as I suffer with an acoustic neuroma in my right ear which was treated with radiotherapy.
With PIP the bottom line is the descriptors and if your condition affects you enough to fit the criteria.
Your condition would cause deafness and balance problems but it wouldn’t make you breathless. So why do you suffer with breathlessness?
That said the descriptor states “Can stand and then move more than 1 metre but no more than 20 metres, either aided or unaided” . Putting the breathlessness aside for now it would be reasonable to argue that you can’t safely and repeatedly move more than 20 meters due to the danger of falling over due to your balance problems. Unfortunately the assessor could consider your walking stick as an aid which might in the opinion of the assessor negate the balance problem. One other point is your condition can cause dizziness due to poor balance but again that might be negated by the walking stick aid.
Therefore it is important to explain (with evidence) why you suffer with breathlessness. As it stands your chances of getting Enhanced Mobility are probably at best 50/50 based on what you have stated above.
Also you have to appreciate that no-one on here was present at the assessment so we don’t know how well it went in order to give an informed opinion.
craigzeth anthony97723
Posted
The breathlessness is generally caused by having to put more energy into walking. Because I have no balance it takes a lot more energy and concentration to walk, even with the walking stick.
anthony97723 craigzeth
Posted
What claimants fail to understand is the assessor is allowed to make an opinion based on the 'balance of probabilities' this is why some of their decisions can seem so heartless and wrong.
That is why I tend to look at it from their perspective. If they have evidence either medical or self assessment they will form their opinion on what they observe at the assessment.
If when asked to walk you became breathless then the balance of probabilities would swing in your favor (or should do!)
If there was no breathlessness then the assessor will decide on the balance of probabilities that you fail the 50% rule (i.e. that the breathlessness affects you more than 50% of the time one of the qualifying criteria.)
Therefore it is very important that the breathlessness was present at the assessment. Of course assessors do get their opinions wrong but that means going down the appeal route and you having to prove why the assessor is wrong. Without direct medical evidence that can be problematic.
If that happens I would stress the ‘dizziness’ angle as that can be very debilitating and I can speak with experience of that.
craigzeth anthony97723
Posted
anthony97723 craigzeth
Posted
However, based on my experience (& others I have spoken to) they sought of drop subtle hints when they state they don't want you to perform a task. Basically the assessor is accepting your disability. That is usually a very good sign.
craigzeth anthony97723
Posted
gettingonmypip anthony97723
Posted
gettingonmypip craigzeth
Posted
craigzeth gettingonmypip
Posted
craigzeth
Posted
anthony97723 craigzeth
Posted
gettingonmypip craigzeth
Posted
craigzeth gettingonmypip
Posted