PMR under 50 years old?
Posted , 13 users are following.
Has anyone under the age of 50 been diagnosed with PMR?
1 like, 30 replies
Posted , 13 users are following.
Has anyone under the age of 50 been diagnosed with PMR?
1 like, 30 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
EileenH
Posted
I responded to pred just like you but was made to reduce to 10mg after 2 weeks which wasn't too bad - and then to 5mg 2 weeks later which wasn't good and was off altogether 2 weeks after that - and then it was all back and almost worse than at the start. The rheumy didn't think it was PMR, he wanted it to be psoriatric arthritis too. Mt GP agreed it sounded more like PMR and was happy to provide the pred - but I have not managed to reduce as easily since then as that very first time. It is recommended by top experts in the US that any reduction should not be more than 10% of the current dose so that would be 1.5mg at present - but most people do get away with 2.5mg at that level. I haven't looked recently - but something also tells me at the back of my mind that the Rheumatology Association guidelines suggest more than 2 weeks for that first 15mg dose and monthly reductions. It depends on the amount of inflammation - the more there is the longer it takes to get it all under control and if your blood levels are raised they may be useful to see how things are proceeding. It's such a shame to spoil the ship for a ha'peneth of tar :-)
all the best - do tell us how you get on!
Eileen
KfromUSA Kazz62
Posted
EileenH KfromUSA
Posted
It pays to be assertive, have all the background stuff to hand and seek a doctor who is willing to treat you as an equal in discussions about diagnosis and treatment.
For a lot of good, reliable info follow this link to a post with a whole load of links:
https://patient.info/forums/discuss/pmr-gca-and-other-website-addresses-35316
All new posts with links are moderated - this is an allowed link ;-)
Heyyady EileenH
Posted
EileenH Heyyady
Posted
There is a thread for contributor's stories - do please put yours there so I can find you easily ;-)
DougR Kazz62
Posted
EileenH DougR
Posted
"Packs" of pred - so popular in the US, are not the right way to manage PMR and repeated use of them leads to a yoyoing of the dose and in some ways the body seems to become resistant to their effect.
The massage effect may be because you have something called myofascial pain syndrome - cause by the same inflammatory substances as PMR but they are found localised in areas of the muscles rather than systemically as in PMR. Massage releases them into the circulation and they apparently cause a flare of PMR until they are washed out of the system. It is a common phenomenon in several complementaty therapies that do seem to have an effect, including massage and/or manual mobilisation of the trigger points and Bowen therapy which I and others have used successfully to deal with these "add-ons" to PMR.
In PMR you have to start with a higher dose to clear out the existing inflammation, about 15-20mg/day has been the suggested level although the most recent recommendations say up to 25mg, and then you reduce in small stages, not more than 10% of the current dose and preferably even smaller, to find the lowest dose that gives the same result as that starting dose did. Every day a new batch of the inflammatory substances are shed in the body - the daily dose is about neutralising their effect every day and not allowing inflammation to build up to a level where it causes symptoms again. But first you have to get it under control and empty the bucket.
DougR EileenH
Posted
I didn't realize that it can go into "check" for awhile. I just assumed my mornings were going to be hell the rest of my life. Right now I can barely pick up the weight of the creamer bottle for my coffee! Thanks again for the help.
EileenH DougR
Posted
DougR EileenH
Posted
carleah13 Kazz62
Posted
EileenH carleah13
Posted
You won't find many people of your age with a diagnosis of PMR - it is felt by almost all rheumatologists to be a disease for over 50s. We do have a few on the forums in their 40s but relatively few. I do know of people with GCA, a related illness, who have been in their 30s - that is one thing that can be proven in some patients, though not all so there can be no argument. There is no test that can confirm PMR at all, and the one for GCA is only positive in ablut half of patients.
Who has made this diagnosis carleah? If you have PMR symptoms then at your age it is far more likely to be something else - I'm not saying it isn't PMR, just that what we call PMR is the name given to the symptoms of an underlying disorder and there is a wide range of such things that must be eliminated before deciding it is the PMR we discuss here.
Apart from anything else, if there is a possibility of RA then the PMR is more likley to be associated with that than be the PMR we discuss here which is a vasculitis rather than an arthritis. Or, if it is a vasculitis you have - then there are several that are found in young people but which are managed in different ways. The PMR we all have only responds to corticosteroids - nothing else really helps - but others respond to other drugs which is a positive.
If your doctor REALLY thinks it is PMR - I would be asking for a second opinion. On the other hand - how is this doctor intending managing you?
dboza Kazz62
Posted
pamela19292 Kazz62
Posted
Hi - I see that there has not been a lot of activity on this page for the past year but I am hoping I will get some feedback. For the past 6 months I have had a moderately elevated CRP level and ESR, pain and stiffness in hips, feet, neck and sometimes elbows - some days it is hard for me to get down the stairs in the morning and I am frequently tired. I have been tested for Lyme, RA, Hashimotos, Lupus and Vascultis and menopause (all my ovarian function was tested). Thyroid has been tested several times. GP sent me to a rheumy. The rheumy he referred to retired. Found one through insurance who did a CBC, ANCA Panel and UA (all totally normal) and told me there was no rheumatological reason for my elevations and to get a chest, abdominal and pelvic CT to rule out malignancy and a pair of Birkenstocks. My ESR was in the 49-55 range (so not terribly elevated - CRP 9-10) (tested three times) and my CBC and UA was totally and completely normal. Anyhow, I just turned 46 and he told me I can't have PMR because I am not 50. My GP initially suspected PMR (found out after I shared my CT referral) and I am now seeking a consult at Johns Hopkins before I undergo the CT. Besides the notion of a screening for malignancy being scary - the CT seems sort of unnecessary at this point - given the fact that I show no other signs of malignancy at this point. It is very frustrating and I can't help but to think that the percentage chance of me having PMR, despite my age, is greater than the chance of having an underlying malignancy. I am just concerned I am going to have to deal with this for the next four years UGH! How much damage does the actual inflammation do to your body in the long term? I am not even sure Hopkins will see me - you have to send your records before you can get an appointment. GP said he is not comfortable diagnosing me because he does not see enough PMR cases. Sorry for the rambling - just wanted to share with people who may have been through this.
EileenH pamela19292
Posted
The guidelines say that over 50 is the point at which you should be considering PMR as a diagnosis - but there are doctors who still believe you have to be in your 70s to have PMR and GCA. But the "over 50" doesn't mean it doesn't happen in under 50s and there are several people on the forums who were either diagnosed in their 40s by experts or who were diagnosed in their 50s - long after the symptoms had appeared. I doubt whatever caused them changed magically on their 50th birthday! The same applies with GCA, the more serious associated disorder which can affect sight. There are documented proven cases in people as young as 37 and several in their 40s. If that happens - so can PMR.
Mine started at 51 - but wasn't recognised until I was nearly 57 and even then it was disputed by a rheumatologist despite a textbook response to 15mg pred where I was almost back to normal movement in 6 hours. Since then I have seen 3 different doctors where I now live who all agree it is the most likely diagnosis.
I'd had 5 years of unmanaged inflammation - has it done any damage? I don't know to be honest. I also have atrial fibrillation which the cardiologist believes is due to the underlying autoimmune disorder that causes the symptoms we call PMR. It is unlikely though that that would have been prevented had I been on pred sooner. Pred doesn't affect the underlying cause at all - it just manages the symptoms to allow a better quality of life in the meantime until the autoimmune part burns out and goes into remission, which it does within up to 4 to 6 years for 75% of patients.
The unmanaged inflammation - chronic, not acute - can cause damage to blood vessels although the increase in risk is greater for the patient who has GCA rather than "just" PMR and that damage could put you at increased risk of cardiovascular disease later. PMR isn't associated with an increased mortality - though of course that will have been assessed on diagnosed patients who will have been on pred.
I'm rather appalled at your rheumy's attitude - and it does confirm my opinion of US medicine. So there is no rheumatological reason - I hope he qualified that by saying "yet" or "that I can find". An ESR that is persistently around 50 is considerably elevated (normal should by any standard be well under 30 and preferably 20 at your age) and should be ringing alarm bells in a 46-year-old. Once, could be a cold. Twice, could be something else. Three times? No, that requires some thought.
I don't know - but I suspect if you were to get an appointment with JH, they too would do a CT. PMR is not the disease per se, it is the outward symptoms of an underlying disorder and there are a lot of options. Some are rheumatological but they also usually are accompanied by other symptoms and blood markers, some of which the rheumy has checked already (didn't seem a lot to me but hey-ho, I'm just a patient) and one of the underlying things can be malignancy which should be ruled out. So why not get the CT done in the meantime? I assue it will be paid for by your insurance under the circumstances? Many of us would have been happy to have been offered one - though a PET-CT or PET-MRI would be more useful in looking for possible PMR and they aren't offered routinely in the UK as they are so expensive.
In the UK a GP who was confident of their suspicion would be able to manage you - although the recommendation is to refer young patients just in case - and would try a moderate dose of pred. This doesn't seem to happen in the USA so you appear to be in the power of specialists who probably look down their noses at "just" PMR - it seems a common attitude.