PMR vs. sero-negative RA
Posted , 8 users are following.
I had posted earlier about this group's experience with Plaquenil. During that same discussion with my Rheumatologist, he wondered aloud whether I might have sero-negative RA rather than PMR. I'm not sure I understand the differences between the 2, other than that PMR will (hopefully) burn itself out. It's almost 4 years and I'm still waiting!
0 likes, 3 replies
EileenH SectionedThrice
Posted
A lot of them start to wonder that when the patient still has symptoms after more than 2 years as they have this idea PMR only lasts 2 years! Rather than the median of 5.9 years that is the case.
RA is an arthritis - and it eventually affects the joints. PMR is a vasculitis and DOESN'T damage the joints. In the early stages they CAN appear very similar - and there are other inflammatory arthritides which can present with a polymyalgia. There are no real definitive clues either way - although the anti-CCP blood test being positive is much more likely in RA than in PMR. Rheumatoid factor is very neither/nor - healthy people can be positive, people with RA negative. The answer comes when joint damage is obvious on imaging - and the hope of early use of DMARDs is to avoid that. The trouble tends to be that PMR can be accompanied by synovitis - making joints painful but it is different.
I think they do often get confused - and I also suspect that the patients who do well with DMARDs (plaquenil, methotrexate, leflunomide) possibly didn't have PMR but LORA (late onset RA).
ClaireJG EileenH
Posted
I think this is one of the most comprehensive and helpful accounts of the differences between the two conditions that I've heard. Thank you Eileen!
r.d.s26296 ClaireJG
Posted
Eileen is such a helpful person. Bless her 👏