Prolia injections - osteoporosis
Posted , 18 users are following.
I was just at the Dr to discuss my latest CRP results (better than expected!) and she asked me if I'd had my bi-annual Prolia injection (I have). when I got back to work I thought I'd do a bit of digging and I found a couple of things that make me wonder if Prolia may have contributed to my PMR developing. Just my imagination but is there a coincidence? Anyone else had Prolia injections?
Check this out:
Prolia was approved in 2010 for the treatment of osteoporosis and for preventing new bone fractures especially in postmenopausal women. This new drug modifies the regulatory control of the immune system over bone remodeling. Its cutting-edge design is matched by the ease of its twice-a-year administration. But Prolia is far from the wonder drug it is being promoted as. By modifying the immune system, it impairs general immune response. And curiously, Prolia can kill off the bones of the jaw and cause hip bone fractures.......
The lack of long-term safety studies for Prolia makes it highly dangerous. Reading the product’s safety information on the manufacturer’s website is particularly depressing. Amgen lists a number of horrifying adverse effects of Prolia.
One can only wonder what other side effects are there if the manufacturer admits to such profound damages.
The severity of the identified side effects of this drug makes it even worse than bisphosphonates. And only time will tell what new side effects will emerge in a decade when independent safety studies are published.
Most of the side effects of Prolia are caused by its negative influence on bone remodeling and its interference with the roles of RANKL in the immune system.
RANKL, for example, is required by T helper cells. By inhibiting such immune cells, Prolia increases the chances of infections, hypersensitivity reactions and autoimmune diseases.
Even the FDA raised concerns about the effect of Prolia on important immune cells and cytokines. But then, the regulatory body approved the drug a year later.
While the disruption of the immune system is terrible, the effect of Prolia on bone remodeling is simply unforgivable. Even Amgen admits on the product page that Prolia can cause thigh bone fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw bone.
7 likes, 44 replies
tina-uk_cwall FlipDover_Aust
Posted
i definitely believe, although I have no evidence, that our environment, lifestyles etc play apart in whether we develop these conditions. I think that our gene makeup plays a part in all of this too.
i read an article about the children of a Manchester (I think it was Manchester) slum area in the 1940's that used to play with all the asbestos dust that would settle in the corners of their streets from the asbestos works next door. I couldn't believe the photos, the children played asbestos balls with it very much like children play snow balls. Now these children were breathing in unbelievable amounts of this most dangerous substance yet only some of the children or indeed occupants of the surrounding area went on to develop asbestosis? Why? Could it all be down to their genes? Some peoples body's are able to accept degrees of substances yet others can't? I just don't know. But take preds, luckily for me I have suffered few side effects (what it's doing to my insides Lord alone only knows) whilst others of you suffer terribly from the side effects of the drug.
i also think that here must be lots of drugs that interfere with the workings of our immune system and if we as individuals have the propensity to be affected by that, then a chain of complications then sets in that we may not suffer the consequences of for many years to come, maybe because our bodies fight it off, and fight it off until it cannot fight it any more then bang!!!
now you know of this information what do you think you'll do now regarding these injections/drug? Regards, christina
arwen1972 FlipDover_Aust
Posted
FlipDover_Aust arwen1972
Posted
rapha FlipDover_Aust
Posted
bronwyn97278 FlipDover_Aust
Posted
judytal bronwyn97278
Posted
my Dr just offered me Cymbalta , She said she has given it to her other PT's who have PMR for energy !! I said NO ... Not another pill!
Oregonjohn-UK judytal
Posted
'The British Medicines Consortium has advised (Sept 2006) that duloxetine (Cymbalta) should be restricted for use by specialist when other treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain are unsuitable or inadequate'
judytal Oregonjohn-UK
Posted
Oregonjohn-UK FlipDover_Aust
Posted
Oregonjohn-UK FlipDover_Aust
Posted
From NICE - NICE recommends denosumab as a possible treatment for preventing bone fractures in some postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (see below).
Who can have denosumab?
If you have not had a bone fracture caused by osteoporosis, you should be able to have denosumab if:
your doctor thinks you are at risk of having a fracture (see below) and
you can’t take alendronate and either risedronate or etidronate.
If you have already had a fracture, you should be able to have denosumab if you can’t take alendronate and either risedronate or etidronate.
You can ask your doctor to explain if denosumab is appropriate for you.
Who is at risk?
To see if you are at risk of fracture, your doctor takes into account your age, your bone density, whether your parents had hip fractures, whether you have rheumatoid arthritis and how much alcohol you drink a day. You might need to have a bone scan (known as DXA) to measure your bone density.
Why has NICE said this?NICE looks at how well treatments work, and also at how well they work in relation to how much they cost the NHS. NICE recommended denosumab for certain
FlipDover_Aust Oregonjohn-UK
Posted
eddylynn36538 Oregonjohn-UK
Posted
EileenH FlipDover_Aust
Posted
In the UK Prolia is at the end of the list - because it is very expensive and you start with No1, alendronic acid, which is cheapest and as you fail each of them for whatever reason you move up to the next.
The marketing for AA was outstanding - bisphosphonates had been used in Pagets disease for 40 odd years and AA was the first to be launched as Fosomax for general use: "Never have a patient dying of a hip fracture again" sort of message. Doctors (being rather naive people) swallowed it hook, line and sinker and the company made a fortune on the back of it. But it hadn't been used for mass numbers before and that is when the real rate of side effects is found.
This is a bit OTT - just like the marketing - but there should be concerns about the blanket use of these things "just in case" which is what happens now. That's why I say "Dexascan first", then you can discuss the situation.
I'm not the only person to have been on pred for a few years and have no loss of bone density. There is no REAL proof that taking this stuff (any of it) prevents hip fractures - there is no REAL correlation between low bone density and fractures. People with normal bone density have fractures, people with low density don't have fractures.
However - Nefret on here has been on Prolia for a couple of years and had no problems at all. Some people have been on AA with no problems. It's like everything else - maybe it was the final straw that broke the camel's back.
As for using Cymbalta for "energy" - well that's a new one on me!!!!!
Juno-Irl-Dub EileenH
Posted
Juno-Irl-Dub FlipDover_Aust
Posted
Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
EileenH Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
That is the basis of most of our complaints. Many GPs and some rheumies hand out bisphosphonates alongside your first prescription of pred or very soon after. No fractures, no dexascan showing reduced bone density, they have been told by the drug reps it will prevent osteoporosis developing and pred can accelerate the development of OP. And it is assumed that anyone over about 60 has osteoporosis - it seems they can see through skin and bone! Some doctors get very aggressive when patients disagree and ask for evidence of their need. That is what we on the support groups say: IF you need them, fine, it is probably worth the risks and that is what use of any drug involves, the benefits must outweigh the risks. However - indiscriminate use "just in case" is not acceptable and now the FDA and others are beginning to catch up on the bad aspects but many doctors have not yet got the idea.
Juno-Irl-Dub EileenH
Posted
lizthib Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
Juno-Irl-Dub lizthib
Posted
Re. what you should do - I'd contact my rheumatologist or doc. straight away, tell him about the side-effects and question him about how long you can expect to have these to continue. And tell him your decision not to continue taking it. Like yourself, I've read also that this med. clears the body in 6 months so hopefully you'll start to feel a lot better in the near future.
Kind thoughts, J
eddylynn36538 lizthib
Posted
Not wanting to wait another 6 months I asked the pharmacist if i needed to pay for the Prolia ($400) and he said not if I didn't take it out of pharmacy, so I quit. My doctor didn't say much except the bad news is that is stays in your system. I have an appointment with my rheumyat the end of month, so see what I get told then. I also have fibromyalgia but I am not in pain anywhere just this d----fatigue!!.,
You have so many other problems to deal with, you shouldn't have been stuck with this one too. So sorry.
Juno-Irl-Dub eddylynn36538
Posted
Kind regards, J
FlipDover_Aust lizthib
Posted
I didn't need it either, my Dexa scan, done 3 years AFTER my GP insisted I have the shots, showed that my bone density is well above average. So far in fact that the Drs couldn't believe it. At 52 I have the bones of a 20 year old! good news indeed. !
Surprisingly, I don't have the shots any more!
eddylynn36538 Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
EileenH eddylynn36538
Posted
You have those readings after 11 years of pred - the received wisdom is tha the majority of bone density loss is in the first 6 months or less of pred usage, probably because the dose is at its highest. There is considerable dispute about the link between low bone density and fracture risk - people with normal bone density have fractures, people with low bone density often don't. There are a load of other measures to take to reduce the risk of falling - which is the greatest risk factor. Now it IS possible that simply being on pred is a risk factor - for separate reasons, but there is no real evidence I know of that increasing your bone density would change that.
I might consider something if my bone density fell - but my biggest reservation about any of the stuff that is given annually or 6-monthly is that its half life must be such that it has an effect on the body for longer if there is a problem. So far, after 4 years on pred there was no change in bone density, I'm sticking with that.
I do hope it works its way out of your system
jennifer_45307 Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
Yes it's good to know it clears in six months.