Posted , 16 users are following.
Hi Guys,
I would welcome insights from anyone who has had surgery for enlarged prostate (100 +)... trying to decide on taking prostate shrinking drugs or a surgical option.
cheers
joe
0 likes, 19 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
barney34567 Snapperjoe
Posted
As someone who has has surgery for prostate cancer and not the benign issue you have, I highly recommend you explore every avenue other than surgery before you decide on it (in case you do).
Snapperjoe barney34567
Posted
Thank you for your considered reply Barney. It is helpful. I am just trying to evaluate surgical options and the use of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors. Trying to decide if I should take the meds first and see how it goes with side effects or just pay and have surgery.
Cheers
Joe
michael55618 Snapperjoe
Edited
I tried Flomax for 6 months and had some modest benefits. When I came in for a 6-month visit, the nurse practitioner found that the fluid retained in my bladder had increased. She doubled the dose of Flomax and added Finasteride to shrink my prostate. I did not see any improvement from the additional drugs. I cannot say for sure what caused it, but my libido dropped sharply during this period.
I would say that trying drugs is worth a shot, but I would have a very candid conversation with your doctor about side effects.
This past June the fluid retained in my bladder after urination had increased to more than 500 ml after urination despite taking both Flomax and Finasteride. While my prostate was not as big as yours (70 grams), my urologist said it was big for my age (55 at the time). He said surgery for me was a matter of when, not if. Long story short I had Aquablation three weeks ago and am very glad I did.
Snapperjoe
Posted
Michael,
Thank you for your detailed reply. Aquablation was one of my preferred treatment options so your experience is encouraging. I hope you continue to make progress.
cheers
Joe
mike19110 Snapperjoe
Edited
I formerly had BPH with a 118 gram prostate. I took an alpha blocker, Alfuzosin, for about a year and it provided modest benefit at best as, in part, I had a obstructive medium lobe protruding well into my bladder. I never tried Finasteride or any other 5-alpha reductase inhibitor as I had concerns about the side effects. I had a very effective and safe Aquablation procedure in January 2022. I now have a very good urinary stream and have no long-term sexual nor incontinence complications as a result of the procedure.
macindian mike19110
Posted
@mike19110 How many weeks did you take to recover from the procedure? Are the first 2 weeks really painful as I had read on the net?
mike19110 macindian
Edited
Each guy is different. I fortunately had a very easy, 2-3 week recovery with very little pain, bladder spasms, bleeding, etc.
macindian mike19110
Posted
My urodoc is insisting that since my prostate is about 40 gms, I should go in for Urolift and avoid any procedure that shaves off tissue ie. aquablation.
compiler mike19110
Posted
Do you still have some symptoms or no symptoms at all after Aquablation procedure?
mike19110 compiler
Posted
No symptoms
mike19110 macindian
Posted
I strongly considered Urolift back in 2020 with a local Uro who specializes in the procedure. In the end, we decided that I was not a good candidate for the Urolift procedure due to the size (~118 gr) and shape (non-mobile medium lobe significantly protruding into my bladder) of my prostate. I also wanted a more durable / definitive procedure that what I probably would have gotten with a Urolift procedure.
mike81026 Snapperjoe
Posted
I had a 140 CC prostate. Had a HoLEP procedure, you can read my report by clicking on my name. Took 4 months to truly, fully be better than normal. Glad I did it.
john80986 Snapperjoe
Posted
Hi all
Bit late to the party but here's my experience...
I had a 175gms enlarged prostate and opted for combined laser/TURP My older brother had the same procedure at the Nuffield in Chichester 3 years ago with excellent results.
I wasn't quite so lucky as my consultant uses the Priory in B'ham which was awful! Hence my recovery was much longer...as in well over 6 months. But now I have good flow, no problems so very happy. If you have a very large prostate, it seems an excellent solution.
michael31017 Snapperjoe
Posted
Not sure how large my prostate originally was, but I had 172g of tissue removed after 3 TURPs and have mostly normal function now almost 2 years after the surgery. My cousin took a different approach with his similarly-large prostate. He had a robot-assisted partial prostatectomy which removed a lot of tissue and required rebuilding the "prostatic channel"/urethra. He said it was a tough recovery.
I took drugs until they didn't work. I may have waited too long since my bladder muscle seems to be weakened after too many years of the bladder trying to push urine out through a tiny channel.
compiler michael31017
Posted
What symptoms do you still have after the TURP?
michael31017 compiler
Posted
The only thing I have to monitor is constipation. For some reason, if I get constipated, I notice that the bowel pushes on the prostate and makes it harder to completely empty my bladder. I have a visit to my gastroenterologist coming up to learn more. I heard from someone online that toxins can leach from the bowel and inflame the prostate, which sounds sort of hard to believe.
Also, I was told to avoid seasick medicines since they can impact the bladder's ability to empty. Otherwise, it all works!