PSA Velocity over 4 months since UTI

Posted , 10 users are following.

I am 67, and been having PSA tests for the last 12 years. I have no symptoms what so ever with water works, other than a slow stream from birth defect with a uretra stricture. My PSA has always been averaging 2.4.

This year, before my annual blood test due, I got a bad UTI, shakes, shivers, temp 103, pain passing urine, vomiting, dull ache behind pubic bone...overal, not too pleasant. Went on antibiotics for two weeks, and most symptoms went, other than the dull ache behine pubic bone some times.. When all appeared to settle down, had my annual blood test. Ummm, PSA now 7.4. Antibiotics for another 2 weeks, retested 1 month later. PSA was 8.2. Doctor thought such a quick rising PSA was usually Prostatitus, so wait a few months and retest. New PSA last week(some 4 months after first high reading) was now 12.

So, some thing not too right. I arranged for a T3 mpMRI last night and see my general doctor next week. Can't get to a Urologist for 2 months, so I had a look my self at the hundreds of MRI pics after the scan, but no idea what is good or bad, so will have to wait unti I can see my general doctor. He said he can't read the pics either, but the radioligist is the bees knees at reading them, so, have to rely on his notes with the doctors set of pics. When I eventually see the Urologist in October, hopefully, we can sort out what is wrong.

Geoff

0 likes, 115 replies

115 Replies

Prev Next
  • Posted

    I also will see urologist Oct 4 for follow up. I just finished 30-day Cipro antibiotics. My PSA below also spiked from 1.77 in June 2015 to 6.96 in Aug 2016.

    I read that such spike is usually infection or PCa. BPH increases PSA too but usually not steep. If my PSA does not come down Oct 4 I will ask for 3T MRI first. Here in Calif USA there are only few well know prostate Radiologist and one of them works 5 minutes from my home. His name is Dr. Roberth Princenthal. They say MRI reading is very dependent on the Radiologist experience. And even with MRI, there is 10-15% chance that cancer will be missed. For my situation, i hope it is infection either UTI or prostatis. I will update Oct 4.

    My PSA results

    04/2013 - 1.69

    06/2014 - 1.43

    06/2015 - 1.77

    08/2016 - 6.96

    10/2016 - ???

    -david

    • Posted

      Hi David, Because i could not get into seeing a urologist for 2 months, I arranged for a mpMRI on a T3 machine, so that at least i could see if I had a obvious PCa. Reading was conducted by chief radiologist who specialises in PCa MRI. The result was nothing evident other than a typical onset of BPH and an overal PIRAD2 score. Also no mass etc in my bladder. For 12 years average of 2.4, then after a UTI, my annual PSA spiked to 7.4, then month later 8.2 then 4 weeks later, 12, then 6 weeks later(now) 13. So, the PSA is still climbing. Hopefully, a visit with the urologist may sort out how to determine the cause of the PSA rise. Maybe the BPH that is developing in my prostate is the cause. Prostate is not too large at 37cc, hence why I have no other symptoms other than PSA rise.

      Geoff

    • Posted

      Antibiotics would rule out infection.

      Have you undergone any STD checks?

      Regardless of the above results, with such PSA readings, I would urge you undergo a MRI to be reported on by a radiologist experienced in prostate imaging.

      Many urologists would ask you to undergo a biopsy without a MRI beforehand, but I feel that the MRI beforehand can only improve the biopsy's outcome.

    • Posted

      UPDATE:

      After finished 30-day Cipro anti-biotics, i had a followup with my Uro today Oct 4. My PSA dropped to 4.00 from 6.96. My Uro thinks it is likely an infection that caused initial PSA spike. So my PSA was 1.77 then 6.96 and now 4.00. See below. Although the drop is

      good news, I don't feel i'm out of the woods yet. I read some men have their PSA goes

      down after antibiotics then only to see PSA elevate again in 3 or 6 or 12 months. So i will see my Uro again in 3 months. Also my free PSA is 18% which means there is still a 20% chance can can be found which is a concern.

      My PSA results

      04/2013 - 1.69

      06/2014 - 1.43

      06/2015 - 1.77

      08/2016 - 6.96

      10/2016 - 4.00 (free PSA is 18%)

    • Posted

      UPDATE

      My Uro also said that my PSA can

      still come down even lower if the infection begins to settle down and resolves.

      I forgot to add that I also asked for 3T MRI and my Uro agreed that it is a good idea. So i'm going to have a 3T MRI done soon.

    • Posted

      Hi David,

      Get the 3T mpMRI as soon as possible. Cost me $500, but well worth the information and a marker going forward. The images and report will indicate to you what the Prostate is doing and if there are any issues that warrant further examination. I see my urologist tomorrow to try and track down my PSA spike now that the MRI said BPH only and maybe the cause??

      Geoff 

    • Posted

      Thanks David, Will do. Considereing the "good" MRI result I have, I do not expect too much bad news; hopefully a remedy for my vertical PSA(now 13).

      A reminder from the good doctor just appeared on my computer 2 seconds ago.

      Geoff 

    • Posted

      I agree with Geoff.

      You must have a MRI ideally 3t which will be reported on by an expert in probate imaging. And soon.

      My reason is simple. Your PSA from 0/15 to 10/16 more than doubled. That is a very good reason to have the MRI ASAP. 

      Don't wait for the next MRI three months away.

    • Posted

      Usually the report is sent to the specialist who referred you for the MRI. Ask for a copy of ten report to be sent to your family doctor as getting a copy form the latter will be easier and quicker than from the urologist.

      Of course the best thing is to get a copy sent to you directly.

    • Posted

      In Australia, we have to get our general doctor to write a letter of 'referal' to a specialist Urologist. Who in turn, if we request it, will refer us to a radiologist for the MRI. The report from the radiologist goes to the Urologist and the general doctor(both have access to the MRI images online). Me, as the patient, (when I pay the fees) get given a DVD with the images at the time of the MRI. The report is usually prepared 1 or 2 days later when the radiologist specialist in prostate MRI images is available. I went to see my general doctor a few days later for my report, as he always gives me copies of my reports and pathology results for my files. We can not get the report sent to us directly by the radiologist.  

      Geoff

  • Posted

    Eventually got to see the urologist today. He thought while the MRI said no reportable PCa, it may still be starting, hence the PSA rise, but no reportable resions. He also thought as the PSA spike was so steep and has gone from 2.4 to 13 in 6 months, coupled with a UTI just before the spike, most probable will be a prostate infection.  Had the dreaded DRE. Slightly enlarged, firm with no lumps or painful areas. So, I had two choices:

    1. Take cipro for 6 weeks, hope it is a bacterial infection and then have the PSA test again to see if any reduction from 13. If so, all well and good. If the PSA does not reduce but remain or climb still, need to consider another plan of action. eg, is it non bacterial or ??

    2. Have a biopsy, but as no lesions, a bit of a stab in the dark.

    As the MRI reported no lesions, I would not agree to the biopsy. So, I agreed to the cipro for 6 weeks. I read many people on Cipro had no side effects and others, it affected them terribly. Anyway, tomorrow, I will start the cipro and let you know how it goes.

    Geoff

    • Posted

      Geoff,

      Trying a course of Cipro can be a good thing to resolve any UTI bacteria lurking around. I agree the steep PSA spike in such a short duration is not likely to be PCa. I just finished 4 weeks of Cipro. Side effects were minimal. The first few days i had some very bad achings on my left testicle but achings went away in a week or so. I think maybe because the Cipro was working and killing off the bacteria. Other side effects is fatigue and tinnitus but not too bad that didn't really interfere with my daily routine. Trying the Cipro will definitely rule out any infection to see if your PSA comes down. Then you know that the PSA spike is most likely connected to the infection. You should Google Dr. William J. Catalona, a very known research Urologist, he has very good info on his site on rapid rising PSAs and causes. He did mention that any PSA increase of +2 ng/ml PSA is likely to be inflammation rather than PCa and suggests trying a round of Cipro to resolve.

      -david

    • Posted

      Thanks David, I will check out Dr. William Catalona site. In "my" opinion, as the mpMRI said no reportable lesions, then I am not too happy about blind biopsy plan if the PSA does not retreat. The infection could be non bacterial? In any case, if cipro does not work, then I need to research how we determine what is wrong with my prostate to cause the rise in PSA and treat PCa as a last resort. As no lesions reported, then what ever is there, if anything, it must be small. If the prostate was similar to gall bladder, it would be out.

      Geoff

    • Posted

      My other half was diagnosed wit prostate cancer. Gleason 3+3 nothing showed up at all on MRI. Also know a chap with it. Nothing showed on MRI. He went for prostate removal and it had spread to his seminal vesicles AND his bladder. Yet nothing on MRI.
    • Posted

      Yes, Alfred, this is a concern. While the MRI indicates no reportable lesions, maybe the PCa is sitting local some how and not clustered sufficient for the MRI to pick it up!

      Anyway, will try the cipro for 6 weeks. If still no change, we will have to be a lot more aggressive and see if we can target a biopsy. As my increase in PSA has been 10+ over a 6 month period, this is likely to be too much too quick for PCa !!

      Geoff 

    • Posted

      I understand you are in Australia. Me too.

      Is the urologist you are seeing for a possible infection of the prostate, experienced enough that you would be happy for him to operate on you?

      Did you have the MRI in a facility that specialises in prostrate imaging?

       

    • Posted

      Hi Barney, The reason it took me 2 months to get an appointment to see the urologist was because he is considered one of the best in Brisbane. On my appointment day/time, he was running 90 minutes late, as he spends most of his time in surgery or at other hospitals, so difficult to get him. And yes, I would trust him as my surgeon. He and two other 'experts' recently ran a Master class for other urologists and radiologists. His 'pedegree'....

      "Peter Swindle is a urologist who specialises solely in prostate cancer. His expertise lies in robotic prostatectomy and he has a special interest in MRI of the prostate. He trained in Queensland and subsequently completed a Masters of Surgery at the University of Sydney on magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Peter then undertook a 2 year subspecialty Fellowship at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York focusing on prostate cancer and undertook two years research on MRI of the prostate. He also completed an American

      Brachytherapy Fellowship at the Seattle Prostate Institute". etc etc

      The MRI facility I used carries out this procedure for most of the urologists and there are only two of the radiologists out of 51 in the practise that are used by my urologist, and the chief radiologist for the practise, being one of the two, provided my report.

      That said, my urologist said the MRI still misses some cancers, due to the nature of the lesion. Often the low score gleeson 2-4 are not found due to them looking like BPH tissue. These of course tend to be the slow indolent cancers that have yet to form into a tumor.

      Geoff

    • Posted

      Dr Peter Swindle's CV looks good. But I can't see how many surgeries of what type he has performed. Specifically, how many were robot assisted radical prostatectomies?

      Assuming that is what you are after if you need surgery.

      You need to find this out. The more surgeries of the type that you will require which  he has performed, the better the likely outcome for you. My point was that once you find the surgeon you trust, it is he who should perform the biopsy and any surgery following the biopsy. Most surgeons will not want to operate using someone else's biopsy result.

      Where does Swindle operates? I understand that Brisbane's Wesley Hospital has a good name for prostate treatment.

    • Posted

      Hi Barney, He does not specifically list how many of each kind of surgery he has carried out. When I asked him, he said several hundred...He works out of the Wesley, Mater Private and Greenslopes.

      He was eager to carry out a biopsy on me asap due to the high PSA. But, he also thought it maybe an infection and try the Cipro for 6 weeks. His view was the MRI did not find anything substancial, so, if there is any PCa, it will probably be low grade. Anyway, we shall see in 8 weeks time when I see him again, after getting another PSA/Urine test.

      Geoff

    • Posted

      I hear you. My point was that most urologists offer an array of treatments: robot assisted radical prostatectomy

      open prostatectomy

      brachytherapy

      brachy & radiation 

      wtc

      You should find the urologist that has a lot of experience in the treatment you are after. My urologist for instance when I asked how many robot assists surgeries he has performed, told me he has done  I believe 800.

      I agree with you to test if you have an infection.if not then you can seek treatment. As the MRI doesnt indicate high grade carcinoma, you may well have an infection or a low grade cancer. both are relatively good news.

    • Posted

      He has the usual stable of procedures;

      robotic prostatectomy

      open prostatectomy

      brachytherapy high and low dose

      brachy and radiation

      turp

      green light

      mri(runs master classes)

      mri guided biopsy

      If and when I get to needing some intervention, then I will be really reviewing his experience in detail. It is one thing having lots of experience in a procedure, it is another knowing which procedure gives the best outcome for a given set of circumstances.

      If I do have a low grade PCa, then the BIG question will be...what next.

      With all the problems with intervention, if possible, watchfull waiting maybe the best option. eg, until the mri indicates a lesion that requres some action...wait.

      Geoff

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.