Red Yeast Rice...Anyone?

I'd suggest part of your problem amy be dealing with a Naturopath. There is scant evidence for any of their treatments being much other than the worst form of charlatanism and quackery, it's up there with crystal healing and homeopathy. 

Homeopathy has been around since 1796. Hardly the beginning of time.

Placebo has been shown time and again to perform at least as well as homeopathy.

I'd also look at the mortality rates and average life expectancy in 1796 (that being when you've identified as the beginning of time) and  those today. https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2003/01/this-wonderful-lengthening-of-lifespan/ 

"In 1796, life expectancy hovered around 24 years. A hundred years later it doubled to 48. In our modern world of air conditioners, hand washing and booster shots, you have a good chance of living 63 years, which is the world average. However, for those fortunate enough to live in a first-world country, lifespan jumps considerably."

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2014to2016

UK average for a child born today is 81.6 years. 

That is not achieved with a bit of water that once had an arnica root near it.

I'm sure your Naturopath has helped you in many ways, mostly in feeling wanted and appreciated for the money you give her. If you want someone to validate your concerns and talk about your feelings I can think of no one better. If you want to be treated for being unwell I'd rather go down the peer reviewed science method if it's all the same to you.

Vague references to "Big Pharma" are no better than conspiracy theories about moon landing fakery, Pharmaceuticals are regulated, tested and reviewed. As newer and better medicines are developed so older ones get replaced, so called "natural remedies" are not subject to the same regulation or checking and should not be afforded any respect in the treatment of illness.

Hope this helps.

Oh Tani, where to start. We may need to find a new word to describe how wrong you are in so many ways.

You seem unaware of what form of charlatanism and quackery you are espousing, it’s not Homoeopathy that’s for sure. Homeopathy was invented in 1796 by Samuel Hahnemann, a German Physician and freemason. It is based on a process of diluting substances in ever diminishing concentrations to the point where none of the original compound can exist in the dilute mix. 1796, as I’m sure you are aware was well after biblical times. Homeopathy is certainly not mentioned in the bible or contemporary records. Whatever snake oil you are using it is not Homeopathy.

I hate to be the one to bring you this news but the Bible is not a scientifically accurate record, Adam and Eve did not exist and even the Pope has accepted that the Big Bang Theory and Evolution are not incompatible with Christian faith. If you are trying to argue Biblical “facts” as your healthcare basis then I’m afraid we won’t be discussing this any further as to even debate the issue suggests there is some legitimacy to your position, which there isn’t.

You can sneer all you like at the scientific method but it provides a verifiable and repeatable process whereas your “make some herbal tea and believe in an invisible friend” method doesn’t.

Don’t bother trying to argue, you are wrong to beyond the point of delusion and your ideas are naïve at best and dangerous at worst. I don’t really mind if you poison yourself but when you start saying stuff like “no statin is a good choice” you stray into areas of endangering others because some other simpleton may believe you.