Replace or inject
Posted , 13 users are following.
Hi all, my 92 year old mother in law has arthritis in the hip and has considered a replacement, however whilst the NHS say yes a private consultant says ...well...maybe or maybe try a cortisone injection.
Any body got any ideas on this?. Maybe somebody has had the same decision to make and has first hand experience and knowledge they can impart.
3 likes, 22 replies
SJCabes steve_1
Posted
I was unsure whether to go with the injection or replacement. My consultant suggested that I try the injection first to see whether it worked and for how long.
It did work but not for that long so as I was only 40 he thought it wasn't a long term solution.
I have since had a replacement. It's been hard going but 6 months down the line I am now seeing the benefits.
Good luck with your decision.
Sarah
bini31328 steve_1
Posted
linda38528 steve_1
Posted
But THR is a traumatic operation and recovery process and the use of anaesthetic used can have serious implication for elderly patients.. There are several factors to weigh, but my guess would be that health of your Mom and her sense of ideal activity levels would be key. I would be very reluctant to venture an opinion as you, your Mom and the docs involved are better placed to judge these.
Good on you for reaching out though ... it is good to into this type of situation with your eyes fully open.
Good luck and please let us know what you and your Mom decide ... it may well help us with future discussions as so many if us care for our parents s well. Bless you for being careful and supportive..
debbi1949 steve_1
Posted
Chris8968 steve_1
Posted
barb31596 steve_1
Posted
the fact that surgery was even suggested tells you a lot; but what would she have to lose if she tred an injection first. She might be pleasantly surprised by the outcome. That being said, I wish my 102 year old mother in law had had her knees replaced about 10 years ago when the injections did not help. She has had fabulous health all her life; but now walks with so much pain. I wsh you both well.
AnnieK steve_1
Posted
Any relief obtained from cortisone injections is always temporary. Some people don't even get any relief, for others it lasts only a short time. No more than 3 can be given in a year's time.
My father-in-law had a partial hip replacement at age 95 after he broke his femur, and he recovered quite well and was able to walk with a walker, which he had needed before the break anyway.
Does your MIL have an opinion about what should be done?
barb31596 AnnieK
Posted
AnnieK barb31596
Posted
barb31596 AnnieK
Posted
AnnieK barb31596
Posted
barb31596 AnnieK
Posted
Barb
AnnieK barb31596
Posted
barb31596 AnnieK
Posted
AnnieK barb31596
Posted
As far as pain, I usually take nothing for it, since I will be having surgery soon, and I just power through it. Sometimes it is just so awful that I take ibuprofen, which doesn't really help, or have a glass of wine! I get that you don't want to have to take pain meds to deal with your limp, since you have no real diagnosis and there is no end in sight for you.
Here's my story. At 3-months I still had a severe limp and could not balance on my surgical leg even for a second. My surgeon's PA kept telling me that I would be fine, that the X-rays were perfect, so nothing serious could be wrong. Of course, X-rays don't show soft-tissue damage. At almost 5 months post-op I still couldn't walk without pain and a limp, even after 22 out patient physical therapy sessions, so I made an appointment specifically to see the surgeon. He had me see a physiatrist in his medical group, who checked out my back (?) with MRI and x-ray, couldn't find anything wrong and kept wanting to shoot up my sacroiliac joint with cortisone. Tried it once, it did nothing for my pain and limp, so why do it again?
From a reply to my discussion here on Patient, I got the idea that perhaps it was a torn gluteus medius or minimus muscle/tendon, and my research confirmed this. Went back to the surgeon at 6 months out and said I thought that was my problem. He said no way, but agreed to the MRI that I requested even though he was sure it would show nothing. Sure enough when he gave me the results, the radiologist had found nothing, and surgeon couldn't see anything on the scans either. He recommended more PT and oral steroids. I have never gone back to him, since I knew something was wrong.
Went to new doctor in a different practice, one who does surgery to repair torn gluteals and has pioneered new surgical techniques for it, and we had another MRI done. The radiologist missed it, but the new surgeon saw the torn gluteal tendon on the scan! He sent me to another doc in his practice who does revisions to check me out for other problems, such as infection or prosthesis loosening. BOTH surgeons will operate on me soon, first to repair the tendons and second to explore the hip area to see what else might be wrong. I feel like I am the patient again, not being forced to be my own doctor and diagnostician.
I find serious fault with the ignorance of my original surgeon. He had told me that no way could those tendons tear badly, and certainly they would never need surgery, that surgery is never done on them. He was obviously completely wrong. It remains to be seen if I will have improvement or full recovery after this second surgery, but at least there is a chance of it. With my original surgeon, there was no chance.
barb31596 AnnieK
Posted