REZUM--HAVE YOU HAD THIS DONE???????
Posted , 385 users are following.
I had a nice conversation today with the President of the "Urology Times". He was telling me that there is a "New Procedure" that has been approved called the "REZUM SYSTEM". The company that makes the system is called "NXThera, Inc". You can google them up and lots of stuff comes up. I called them for a referral and they gave me a Doctor in Minnepolis that has done it over 50 times now. I called his nurse and she said he would call me back and answer my questions on monday. As you guys probably know Doctors are not very good at returning calls but we'll see what happens. Iam not very good at explaining how the procedure works but basically they take the device and put it up the uretha and vaporize the prostate cells which kills them. It works with high pressure "steam" that at a certain degree will kill the prostate tissue. My question for you guys is there anybody out there that has had it done to them and how are you getting along and are there "side effects", etc etc?????
35 likes, 5645 replies
boyd93082 ChuckP
Posted
One good update deserves another.
I had my Rezum procedure in mid-September. Had Foley in for 4 days then had to self-cath in order to pee. This continued until December 8th (82 days). Then I started squeezing out some pee in drips and drabs, but no stream. This improved over the next week until I was able to get a very weak stream when sitting on the toilet--not enough to pee standing up, though. I still had to cath in order to void enough to sleep for any length of time. By December 16 (90 days from procedure) I felt I could void enough to stop using the cath. I get about 2-3 hours between needing to sit and pee. Still not enough stream to stand up. The procedure seems to have eliminated (for now, at least) my urinary retention issues, as after voiding without the cath, I have used the cath to test out what's left and it is always under 200 ml. So, I deem the process a success, though the very long period requiring self-cathing was both unexpected and inconvenient. Unlike some others who have reported, I found no pain whatsoever with either the procedure or the healing process. It was done with mild anesthesia. Overall, I'm a happy camper.
oldbuzzard boyd93082
Posted
JerseyUrology boyd93082
Posted
Wonderful your results are so positive.
We have treated many patients in similar situations as yours, and most have done great as well (Although it may take a few weeks for the results)
Happy holidays
JerseyUrology boyd93082
Posted
Wonderful to hear.
We have seen many patients in retention or near retention improve drastically after a few months.
Have a wonderful holiday
jimjames boyd93082
Posted
Congratulations on your recovery. Sounds like your urologist was correct when he preached patience because of the aggressive approach.
As long as you have been self cathing for several months, and assuming no major UTIs or complications, I would consider self cathing once a week or so to make sure your PVR holds at under 200ml. Should it start slipping, you might consider resuming the self cathing on a reasonable schedule for its bladder rehabilitation effects, especially if the bladder was very stretched going into Rezum. Alternatively, I would have PVR checked monthly for now at your urologists via bladder scanner. With the great strides you made, you want your progress to hold and/or continue.
Jim
JCL123 ChuckP
Posted
Hi guys happy New Year.
I had another cystscopoy done today at USC medical center. It has been 5 months since I had rezum performed. If you have been following along you know I have not had improvements with my urine flow since having Rezum. Today's cystscopoy showed that my prostate has not shrunk at all absolutely no reduction in size or appearance it was treated according to urologist. He now wants to do the bladder tests then discuss options for removing the prostate. I am very disappointed as you can imagine. I feel like another year of my life has been wasted by this whole Rezum process. From the first visit to today all for nothing...wait almost forgot I do still have RE after rezum so I did get something out it!
hank1953 JCL123
Posted
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
Sorry that it did not work did they tell you way. Don't think about having your prostate out there has to be a better way. Why not have the Urolift It will open you up with out cutting. And when they do the clips they can check the tube and un block it. Don't let him talk you into having anything removed Thank about it Good luck ken
JerseyUrology JCL123
Posted
I’m sorry you’re still having an issue
You may wish to get a second opinion.
If the prostate truly hasn’t changed at all, it leads me to think that perhaps the device wasn’t working
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
JCL123 JerseyUrology
Posted
The urologist that performed the Rezum said it could not be my prostate causing the weak flow - he even called the Rezum rep. and on speaker phone he said ya cant be the prostate must be his bladder so he put me on Toviaz which made it impossible to pee.
When I called his office to report this they said stop the Toviaz and start the Flomax again. The Flomax and Rapaflo did not help at all.
That is when I called NxThera and they recommended I go to a medical urology center at a hospital not an office urologist. They recommended I have more tests done to show why I was still having a problem, but they also said it wasnt going to be the prostate it was more linkely a urethra stricter.
I was seen by Dr. Wiegand at the USF Urology Tampa General Hospital. Dr. Wiegand said 1st he would need to do a rectal check and then a cystoscopy to see if my prostate himself and to see if I had some scaring.
I agreed to the scope and he immediately said yep your prostate is large and I see no evidence that you have Rezum or any other procedure performed - you look like I would expect a new patient with your complaint to look.
He has me scheduled for a video bladder dynamics test next month. He said if that test shows that my bladder is working good we can discuss option for prostate such a TURP etc
I am as anyone can imagine so disappointed. I have been dealing with this since I was 23- 47 now. How is it meds did not work? Rezum did nothing but cause RE and now I have this constant mild pain in my penis since Rezum.
I did not go back to the Rezum urologist because he in my opinion should have done 4 or more treatments on both sides on just 2. Considering I was suffering from this for over 20 year why not make sure to get it?
Now I must research TURP and all the other options for reducing prostate.
Advice?
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
Don't get a TURP. Don't consider a TURP - its an outdated procedure with a long recovery and when things go wrong, it can be horrible and permanent (incontinence/impotence).
There are other things, pending a full workup that you could consider. Believe it or not, if you have simple
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
Don't even consider a TURP. Its an outdated procedure with a long recovery, potential for devastating side effects (lifelong incontinence/impotence) and for simple BPH other things that are less invasive with much less risk could do the job. You've learned from experience that procedures can be botched. With Rezum, the consequences are minor, with TURP, a mistake or bad outcome can ruin the rest of your life.
If full diagnostics confirm that your prostate is the only (or an important one) issue, believe it or not, Rezum in a competent surgeon's hands is a good idea, even after the failure - either the machine wasn't working properly or the doc didn't know what he was doing, most likely. Urolift, PAE, FLA and even Greenlight are all less invasive with fewer side effects.
JCL123 oldbuzzard
Posted
hank1953 JCL123
Posted
From what I've read, Greenlight used to be good, until the last couple years. Read recent posts from Robert. He had very bad problems post Rezum. Turns out to be a bunch of stones. Hank
JerseyUrology JCL123
Posted
JCL123- Sorry to hear.
The Rezum could be repeated, but based on your experience, I don't think you would trust that.
Urolift may or may not be helpful.
The TURP is considered the "gold standard"; most younger urologists use one of the newer techniques to accomplish it, such as with the Plasmabutton or a laser; results are generally good assuming that obstruction is the issue.
Aquablation is "the latest" procedure offered, and appears to have excellent (early) results; would definitely ask your urologist to review all of these options with you.
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
It can be, but its a breeze compared to TURP. I don't know why Urologists (including Jersey Uro who is normally right on the money) insist on calling it the gold standard. So many other ways to accomplish similar results are available with much less risk and much shorter recovery times. TURP is a full blown surgery and it can be months before you're fully continent, assuming all else is good. Why would anyone recomend or do that as anything but a last resort is beyond me.
jimjames JCL123
Posted
Dr. Weingand seems on the right track. The others not so much to put it kindly. If the scope and video urodynamics points to the prostate as still being the problem, there are a number of less invasive options than TURP, including self catherization as part of a watch n' wait strategy till a better procedure comes along. If the problem isn't the prostate, then you can't expect good results from any prostate reduction procedure. I think it's good you left the urologist who did the procedure at this point. Don't go back. Even if it turns out that the problem isn't your prostate, he should have known that in advance by doing a proper workup including urodynamics.
Jim
JCL123 jimjames
Posted
jimjames
I have had at least 6 cystoscopies done over the past 20 some years. Dr. Wiegand was the only Urologist that did not hurt me at all. He had me in a special chair in a room just for this procedure. The office Urologist's I have seen all these years just used the lay down table in their exam rooms and wheeled in the scope.
Anyway I am not sure what I should do about the prostate problem. Dr. Wiegand named off a few things we could consider doing after all the testing are done. He was telling me this while I was trying to clean-up from the scope so I did not remember anything he said. I just remember saying to him is that what they call the gold standard procedure and he said yes. I do not and will not get a TURP after reading about it today.
I just cannot believe that with all the technology we have today their is not yet something safe with no side effects for dealing with this problem.
I was trying to do some research on procedures but there are so many options and opinions, and not all are available at all locations. It seems that most of whats out there is what the office urologist can just do as an in and out from his office procedure with no anesthesia. Again we are just cattle.
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
JCL. Don't let that doctor rush you into anything. If you do find out that it is your prostate. There is a lot you can look into. You can either do a Urolift which does the same as the other procedure without cutting your prostate out. It will make a tunnel and relax the bladder or like JIM said do CIC for a while when you need to. Try to do what the least side effect are for you. Take care Ken
JCL123 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
I agree with Kenneth. Any doc who only offers those two procedures needs to be replaced.
Both are outdated, are more invasive than necessary and include a more extensive side effect profile than the less invasive, usually as effective ones. Greenlight will leave you needing a diaper for at least a few weeks most likely, has a 50/50 chance of causing RE, requires anesthesia and can leave you incontinent. The skill of the surgeon impacts the outcome significantly, but the main point is that less invasive procedures with no anesthesia with almost no chance of causing any permanent problems are available that work as well as greenlight.
I'm not sure how bad your situation is currently - but if you you are in retention or having trouble functioning normally enough, I would self cath until I found a doc who could do Urolift or Rezum. If you're not that bad, just find a doc who lives in 2017.
JCL123 oldbuzzard
Posted
I have been doing some reading/research on TURP and Green light. I will not do the TURP there is not reason for me to when there is the Greenlight. I have heard both good and somewhat good and some bad and very bad things about all the procedures.
Keep in mind the new uro I have works in a hospital now an office in a strip mall. He is a professor of urology at the University of South Florida. He said there is not reason to do the less invasive procedures. He has great results and outcomes with Greenlight. He said when the other in office therapy doesnt work what else are you going to do.
It makes sense to me, but I am not looking forward to having anything done, not even trying Rezum again or a Urolift. I am already in pain from 1 Rezum that did not work. I just hope that whatever I do thigs do not get worse.
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
JCL I am so sorry that you had a problem with Rezum. They must have not did it right. But your doctor is very one side He sound like a car sale men. My procedures are the best so do mine I know better. You say you want something to last well . Turp and GL don't last forever either. There have been men on here that have to have repeat procedure. There was one man on here that had 2 Turps and 1 GL with in a year because of all the problem the first one caused. There are other urologist here in Florida that are not in a strip mall. Urolift is a very good procedure just like some of the others less evasive procedure. I had mine done 3 years ago. And it has been around for almost 7 years. If in a few years I have to have another couple clips put in so be it. I have no side effects at 62. And no man is going to tell me I need my prostate cut out to pee better. What ever procedure you pick is on you. Not any of us or the doctor. He's going to get paid no matter wait. And he will not have to deal with any side effect you get. I wish you luck in your pick. God help you make the right one for you Ken
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
I understand your conflicts here. You might want to get a second opinion - greenlight isn't permanent either and the recovery can be long and messy - even when it works well. But I get that you don't want to do Rezum again - I probably wouldn't either.
You can also consider that Interventional Radiologist option. They can do PAE (if you don't have an enlarged median lobe) or Focal Laser Ablation. It might be worth a consult there before committing to Greenlight. Last comment there - i think most men get good results from Greenlight when a skilled experienced doc does it. How many has yours done? The big concern, is that when things go wrong (admittedly rarely with an experienced surgeon) that horrible things can happen, which is not the case with the less invasive procedures.
Good luck!
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
It is very hard to make the right decision.on what to have done if anything. But you have to realize a doctor's can only tell you what they think will work for you. He really does not know if it will until he does the procedure but by then it may be to late then what. We are all different. You found that out the hard way. Rezum did not work for you and you said they do not know why. If your prostate is the problem. I think a UROLIFT will do the job. It will open you up without cutting the prostate. All the procedures do the same thing. Make a tunnel. We are all on here to try to help you. That is a very hard job. Being different we all have our own concern's for our life. Please get all the information you can before you do anything God Bless Ken
ken19524 JCL123
Posted
Your situation is a very difficult one. You are like most of the other guys on here; we do the research and we choose the path that we think is best for us individually. It must be extremely disappointing that the Rezum didn't work, and in fact, has caused new problems. I know that this isn't any consolation, but I found out today that over 17,000 Rezum procedures have been done to date. To me, that statistic alone says that the vast majority of Rezum procedures were successful, because we rarely hear about a failed one like yours. It also indicates that something was not done correctly by your Rezum surgeon. Possibly he didn't inject steam at the correct locations, for example. Because of the issues that you are having, you need to be very cautious about choosing the next step. In my mind, the best thing for you to do is to find a urologist who will look at a 3T MRI and help you decide the best course of action. My understanding is that this type of high resolution MRI will provide a detailed 3D view of the prostate, bladder, sphincters, etc. If you go with another procedure without knowing what your individual organs look like right now, the new procedure may or may not provide relief. You deserve to get it done right this time.
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
oldbuzzard JCL123
Posted
kenneth1955 oldbuzzard
Posted
Doctor's do make mistakes now what is he going to do to fix the problem. I would get another doctor I would not trust him and I would not want to be another one of his mistakes Good luck Ken
JCL123
Posted
I need to clear up something from a post a made yesterday, Cindy did not recommend that I get Rezum done for a second time. What she said was I "could do a second Rezum" in an attempt to remove more tissue as a treatment option. Just wanted to clear...
JCL123 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 JCL123
Posted
I am happy that your looking at it that way. Your taking control of your body. Your a young men. You should be having fun not doing research for your prostate. I trust my urologist but i do push him. If I don't fellow what he said's I keep asking question. I had a problem a few weeks ago. Went into the hospital for one problem and ended up with another. My bladder stopped. Had to be catheterize 7 times what a mess. I wanted to know why. Everything went back to normal. Was in the hospital 9 day. My doctor told me that he did not know if this will happen again so it would be a good Idea for me to learn how to do CIC. So he gave me some catheter. Try for a week. Was painful but after about 6 tries I got it in. All week was having pain in groin and having a little blood. Was told CIC does cause some bleeding. That I was aware of. But what happen to me a week later. Got up at 5AM to go to the bathroom. Stood them for a while nothing was coming out. I pushed all I got was dark blood and some clogs. I still felt that I had to go. It took me about 15 minutes but I finely got it going All blood again and then I felt something coming through the urethra. It was about 4 to 6 inches a clog or tissue. This was 2 weeks ago. After that stuff came out I started to pee pink. It took 2 days to get back to normal. My doctor will be doing a scope on me next Thursday. I'm sorry but to me that did not feel that was normal. I think I tore some of the tissue when I was pushing the catheter in. I have all way check myself after a bath and to me I don't feel the same on both sides of the base. The muscle around the base of the penis. I don't remember what that is called but we will see if all is ok. I like to make sure. At 62 I don't want any surprises Take care men and good luck in your search. Ken
hank1953 kenneth1955
Posted
Ken, sorry to hear about your problem. Yes, you are right. What happened to you is not normal. Hope the urologist will figure out what's wrong. Yes, it could be CIC. CIC does have its own risk, especially for beginners.
Also, I know you may not like to hear this but I wonder if your Urolift clips maybe causing problems. Hank
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Ken,
I think a scope is a good idea. It's not surprising you had issues with CIC, because if I remember correctly the doctors had similar issues inserting a Foley when you were at the hospital. That said, it's not unusual for some bleeding the first several weeks of CIC. Hopefully your doctor is well versed in CIC, so he can tell you what is normal and what isn't.
Jim
jimjames oldbuzzard
Posted
I hope that's the case, and I could be wrong, but my understanding is that the manufacturer doesn't have to report treatment failures and side effects that were not documented in the original studies. That's where anecdotal info like what we get here can be helpful, as well as a misdirected internal memo! But even if operator error, still a consideration given how new the procedure is and how new many of the doctors doing Rezum are to the procedure. I believe the "training" period is just a couple of hands-on hours.
Jim
kenneth1955 hank1953
Posted
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
Good morning Jim, Hank and the other guy's I consider friends that I have made over the last few years. I cannot wait till Thursday to see what is going on. I will be having a cystoscopy. I think my prostate got bigger or could be my kidney's. Over the last week I have been waking up in the morning to go to the bathroom. I have a lot of pain in my groin and the back pain is murder. Sitting or standing. When I got up this morning I tried to wait for a little while to make sure I went good. Will I sat down and it took a while to go. I still am going but there really is no force it just come out slowly still feeling like I have to go but nothing. My doctor order something for me but my pharmacy can't figure it out. They said they don't understand what is writing. I think it was for pain have to call at 10 to see if they have it yet. I know this is not something over night. I think what ever the problem is it has been building up to something. I think the hospital stay and that kidney infection started the whole thing. It seams like every week after that there was something else to add. What every it is I will deal with it. If it's kidney stones. I will have them taking care off. If it the prostate I am ready to have a few more clips put in. What ever it is I will deal. I just want the pain to go away. Well I hope you all have a good Sunday. I'm just going to take a Tylenol and go lay down. Thank you all Ken
JCL123 kenneth1955
Posted
I understand being in pain. I am still suffering myself over 5 months now. I wish there was a one size fits all fix for us guys. This forum has been some help knowing I am not alone.
hank1953 kenneth1955
Posted
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Ken,
I agree that this is probably just a continuation of whatever brought you to the hospital last time. Hopefully they will figure it out quickly and get you better. Sorry you have to go through all this. Taking a Tylenol and a rest sounds like a good plan.There is also something called "azo" that some have found helps with urinary tract pain, however I wouldn't take it without the doctor's approval, since by masking pain it can sometimes make diagnosis more difficult.
Jim
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
Thanks guy's. Jim I do know about that brand. I have to take my son to work at 1:30 he works at Walmart's. I have to check if they have the other stuff ready. In a way I do think it's stone been having a lot of back pain Had some removed about 14 years ago. They were the size of jaw brakers. I do have to worry about the defective kidney. It is about a 1/3 smaller then the other and it is sitting on the bladder and pelvic wall. I want this fixed has soon as possible Thanks again guy's Ken
davidaami kenneth1955
Posted
Don't hesitate to go to the emergency room or urgent care if you think they can do something for you.
kenneth1955 davidaami
Posted
Thank you David. If I have to I will. Was laying done still have pain front and back. It does help if I lay on my side. I think I'm going to take hot bath. No feeIing to go even with the discomfort. Went at 5 AM. Maybe the bath will help. We will see.. Ken
davidaami kenneth1955
Posted
So you haven't urinated in 6 and a half hours? That's a long time. Not sure if drinking water would help. If you do self-catheterize make sure to be scrupulously careful about sterile technique.
?Don't overdo it on Tylenol. Don't take any more than what the maximum is that you're allowed to take.
kenneth1955 davidaami
Posted
Yes that is right David. Just got out of the tub. Back still hurts but was able to pee a little when I got out. The only thing is I don't know if this has anything to do with anything but got very dizzy Had to hold until the wall so I would not fall.Boy getting old is the bits Thanks you Ken
davidaami kenneth1955
Posted
It's a big change in blood pressure when you're relaxed in a hot tub and your blood vessels are dilated, to suddenly getting up. When you get a chance while you are sitting or lying down, just take your blood pressure with your monitor.
kenneth1955 davidaami
Posted
davidaami kenneth1955
Posted
Ken if you're taking a blood thinner I have to wonder whether that's making you bleed more from the Rezum procedure compared to the average person.
kenneth1955 davidaami
Posted
Hey David. I did not have the Rezum procedure Sorry about that. I had a Urolift done 3 years ago. Was in the hospital for 9 day's just before Thanksgiving. Bladder stopped working. They found out I had a kidney infection and my bladder was inflamed. I was told to learn CIC It took me 5 try's which was pain full. The fifth time it went straight in. No problem. Had some bleeding a few weeks ago. One night before I went to bed saw some blood at the tip. Cleaned myself up and went to bed. Got up at 5 AM could not pee. After about 5 minutes I felt like I had to go. Nothing but blood came out. They had the feeling again but could not go. About 15 minutes later went all blood then I felt something coming through the urethra. It was about 4 to 6 inches of a clog or tissue I don't know.After that came out I started to pee pink and they it changed to a normal color. This week been having no blood but been having the pain in the groin and the back. I will see Thursday what is going on. Been sending the information to my Urologist. Sorry about the confusion Ken
hank1953 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 hank1953
Posted
kenneth1955 JerseyUrology
Posted
Good afternoon. Sorry to get off the subject . But I am trying to help one of the guys on here. He was put on Avodart. He has been on it for a long time. It did it's job the first year his prostate got smaller but after 4 years it went wild. The doctor did not tell him about the side affect. And he I guess did not look it up. He took the doctor word that it would help. He was told that he can never get off of it. His sex life was put in the box and mailed away. His there a drug he can take to counter act the Avodart and try to get back to some normal. Any information you can give me may help him Thank you. ken