Self Catherization. An alternative to Turp, Greenlight, HoLEP...?
Posted , 82 users are following.
Since I posted a thread about self-catherization -- more formally called Clean Intermittent Catherization (CIC) -- there have been a few different discussions on the topic in various threads. I thought it might make sense to bring those discussions over to a dedicated thread. With that in mind, I will summarize and/or copy and paste some of what was said before into this thread for better continuity.
My story in a nutshell. 68 years old with BPH probably since my late 20’s. Watch n’Wait strategy with on-and-off trials of Tamsulosin (Flomax) with poor results. Symptoms were the normal retention issues resulting in frequent urination with incomplete emptying, urgency, and having to go to the bathroom at night in increasing frequencies. Near the end, two or three uti’s per year often accompanied by gross hematuria (bleeding).
Two years ago things got significantly worse and I couldn’t urinate on my own without physically pushing against my bladder (Crede Maneuver). That led to another trip to the urologist where ultrasound showed significant retention and hydronephrosis (water in the kidneys). I was told I needed an operation (this facility primarily did Turps) but first I had to rehabilitate my bladder because at the time it was too flaccid (stretched) for a good surgical outcome. I was given the choice of wearing a Foley Catheter for six weeks, or a program of self-catherization (CIC) in order to decompress the bladder. I chose CIC so I didn’t have to wear a Foley 24/7, and also because I felt it put me more in control.
Six weeks later my bladder was rehabilitated to the extent they could do a Turp, and the hydronephrosis was gone. After doing some research and a lot of thinking I decided to put off the Turp due to the potential of irreversible side effects, primarily retrograde ejaculation. Two years later, I am still doing CIC while waiting for newer procedures with better outcomes and fewer side effects.
I will detail my experiences with CIC in following posts -- but to summarize, once mastered, it’s a painless five minute procedure that allows you to empty your bladder completely any time you want. With CIC, I therefore have no retention issues, no urgency, and in most cases sleep 6-8 hours through the night without having to get up and go to the bathroom. No UTI’s in over 18 months. And because my bladder has been partially rehabilitated, I can urinate normally about 50% of the time without using the Crede maneuver. My IPSS Score (International Prostate Symptom Score) would be Zero (the best), albeit with a little mechanical assist.
As of now, nothing that I have read about the various current procedures has tempted me to have an operation. That could, or could not change, in the future, but the nice thing about CIC is that you can stop it any time you want with no repercussions. The caveat is that CIC should be done under the supervision of a doctor who will monitor your BPH as required. Similar to seeing a doctor on a regular basis during a Watch n’ Wait BPH strategy.
I know many of you here have already had operations like Turp, and in most cases people seem pleased with the outcomes. CIC certainly isn’t’ for everyone, and I can understand why someone does not want to carry around a urinary “tool box” with them. On the other hand, with practice, it’s not the traumatic and scary procedure some think. I can honestly say right now that for me it’s about as traumatic as brushing my teeth.
I’m offering my experiences and thoughts on CIC for any of those who haven’t yet made up their mind on an operation. It even can make sense for those of you who don’t need an operation yet, but want to increase their IPSS quality of life score. In fact, wish I had done CIC earlier while on Watchful Waiting. Didn’t realize how much BPH had been affecting me for most of my adult life until I was able to empty my bladder completely.
CIC doesn’t have to be a permanent solution, it could just part of a waiting strategy like I’m on, until better surgical operations are developed with better outcomes and fewer permanent side effects.
For any number of reasons, the majority of urologists don’t seem to offer CIC as an alternative to surgery. My current urologist doesn’t as far as I know, but he’s OK with what I’m doing because it works for me. So, either you have to find a urologist you can convince to go along, or go to some of the major teaching hospitals where CIC is probably more in use and better understood. That is where I was taught, albeit not very well, but that is another story.
Jim
19 likes, 2092 replies
john11426 jimjames
Posted
Regarding TURP and the like,
After viewing you tube videos of proceedures, what they look like in the colour monitor of the endoscope, I have the impression that the 180 watt greenlight laser surgery is even worse than a conventional TURP. It seems quite messy. TURP leaves a relatively clean and smooth surface, and it looks like the surgeon would have better control of the cutting accomplished by the wire loop. Although I've read that laser surgery causes less loss of blood due to the system for cauterization. I haven't yet seen a video of HoLEP surgery.
Although ubiquitously touted as the "gold standard" therapy for relief of LUTS due to BPH, I don't like the fact that TURP creates a cavity in the prostate almost like a second bladder. I think it might cause a kind of urinary incompetence (sporadic leaking) if the cavity remains full of urine after the bladder is voided. It is interesting that there are two sphincters in the male urethral tract, one at the base of the bladder and one at the base of the prostate. I think the worst effect of TURP and the like is that it usually results in sterility and sometimes in impotence as well. That may not be a problem for some but for most men, I think losing the ability to father a child is an undesireable side effect. I don't know what happens to the epithelial lining of the urethra in the prostate after a TURP. Does it grow back? If not, what are the consequences? I think it would be good to leave the epithelium intact. Some minimally invasive surgical proceedures may t do that, but I don't know what they are. So what is so golden about TURP?
I don't know for sure if TURP will mean less retention for me b/c if my bladder doesn't shrink down and the detrussor muscles don't work to empty my bladder, TURP may not make much of a difference. I like the idea of a trial period of CIC to see if the bladder can be completely rehabilitated first, b/c there is less risk. The TURP procedure also results in a small percentage of cases with incontinence (due to sphincter damage), in which case, I might be on catheterization for life.
I also like the idea of a biodegradable stent (e.g. Biofix) in combination with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor medication. The stent relieves LUTS long enough for the proscar or avodart to shrink the prostate. I don't know how much shrinkage one can expect with with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, and how much relief from LUTS this shrinkage will effect, but it might be worth a try.
A good review of minimally invasive devices for treating LUTS is Fouad Aoun, Quentin Marcelis and Thierry Roumeguère Res Rep Urol. 2015; 7: 125–136. Published online 2015 Aug 19 It includes Rezum.
I have a 24 hour cycle in the rate of urine production. I produce more urine at night than during the day. I think that may be due to the fact that I am taking in water during the day (eating and drinking) and not at night. It takes awhile to remove water from the system, i.e. there is a time lag between intake and output. I imbibe faster than my kidneys can process the blood. If I were using intermittent catheterization, I would have to get up several times in the night to catheterize my bladder b/c I produce at least 2 L of urine during that period. I would have to use an alarm clock or timer. Has anyone tried to keep an intermittent caheter in overnight while they sleep? Then I could use a drainage bag and I wouldn't have to get up so many times. For some reason even with the foley and night bag I still get up 2x each night to empty the bag.
Regarding CIC,
Can you feel both sphincters when inserting the catheter? I gather that the first one at the base of the bladder is the main hurdle. It coincides with a sharp change of direction in the urethra and with narrowing of the passage due to enlarged prostate. Is there any way to relax that sphincter and cause the catheter angle of approach to change? The nurse who comes to my house periodically told me that some people say that coude catheters hurt more than straight ones. Can anyone confirm this?
What about topical anaesthetic? Does anyone use it routinely?
I'm afraid if I tell the urologist I want to postpone TURP long enough to have a go a CIC he will try to discourage me. I don't have a lot of experience with it, but the health care system in Ontario seems rather restrictive to me. For one thing, some doctors nurses and midwives seem kind of terse and not interested in patient education. I get the feeling they are marching to the same drum (the public health insurance system that is run by the province). I have a feeling that in Ontario, your options for BPH are pretty limited, but I can't yet confirm it.
A therapy that promotes apoptosis of prostate cells, benign and malignant, would of course be ideal. (A urologist once told me he thinks BPH and prostate cancer is a continuum.) It's ironic that BPH is both a disease of old age and of sex. I don't think there is universal agreement about whether it is due to too much or too little sex, or just to changes in sex hormome balance due to aging. In other words, we don't know the mechanism that causes it.
rich90688 john11426
Posted
As for your nocturia problem, have you tried not eating or drinking between 6pm and 6am? If not, it's probably worth a try. It's worked for me. As far as TURP being the "gold standard", it's the gold standard for the docs and hospitals that receive your gold. For those who go under the knife, not so much.
jimjames john11426
Posted
Try my best to answer your questions.
Yes, you can feel both sphincters when inserting the catheter, but less and less as you learn to relax and as your body gets used to the process. After awhile, it becomes an automatic, painless kind of procedure like brushing your teeth. That said, in the beginning there can be issues depending on the person. In my case I had bleeding, false urgencies, some pain, and developed a UTI. Many others have it easier
As to relaxing the sphinter, again it comes with time. In the beginning CIC was very tense and stressful for me, so of course my sphincters were tight. Later, things loosed up .Now, I make a concerted effort to relax the whole area, along with slow breathing during the process, in a similar way you do yoga relaxatio exercises. I also read somewhere that the void process is 80% relaxation of the sphincter and only 20% pushing with the detrussor muscles. With me it's probably 90/10, as most of my concentration during a void is on relaxing the sphincter. As far as navigation goes, I start with the penis at straight up toward the sky, but as soon as the catheter gets to where it will go around the prostate, I drop the angle so the penis is parallel to the floor. I find this makes insertion easier, at least from the standing position, which is the only position I have ever used.
As to your question if coude catheters hurt, I have only used coudes so I can't give a comparison. You would really need to speak to someone who has used both, but most here seem to have only used one or the other. But as I said before, I don't have any pain during CIC, so my coude doesn't hurt. The purpose of the coude is to be able to navigate more easily around the enlarged prostate without snagging it and also to avoid sticking the urethra and creating a false passage. They also apparently help if you have any type of urethral abnormality.
In my opinion a topical anaesthetic is unecessary because there is no pain, however maybe that would have helped me the first couple of weeks. However, you have to be careful of what you use is water soluable and not something in a petroleum base like vaseline. Also, if you use a hydrophillic catheter like I do, the hydrophillic coating might not work as well if you have some sort of numbing gel inside. Probably not a problem with a more traditional catheter that requires the use of a lubricant gel.
If you think you want to give CIC a try, I would go for it and not worry about your doctor's reaction. If he resists, you can find another one hopefully although not sure how that works in Canada. There are also studies out there that suggest a six to twelve week trial of CIC prior to TURP will improve TURP outcomes. You might try that approach with him.
So let us know how things work out, or if you have any more questions.
Jim
jimjames
Posted
Jim
kenneth1955 john11426
Posted
michael72708 john11426
Posted
Thanks for the info about the Fouad Aoun article on LUTS and minimally invasive therapies. Really up to date. What intrigued me there was not the Rezum but the PEMF. It was not prominently featured but it got me to an animal and human studies using some of the footnotes and a couple of mentions in the main article. Seems like the Parsemus Foundation funds studies of minimlly invasive overlooked therapies and they funded one on Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on dogs prostates and it resulted in a 57% reduction in size with absolutely no side effects. There have been previously published human studies. This is a therapy used to mend bones and other current applications. I'm using CIC/SC while waiting for this type of really minimally invasive therapy.
rich90688
Posted
I read that both peppermint and spearmint leaves were effective anti androgens. A pound these dried leaves from Amazon cost me only slightly north of $14 each. A pound of mint leaves is a large quantity, so, even if the leaves didn't work, I figured they would make great tasting tea and that my cost would be next to nothing.
I cold brewed them, using a 1/4 cup of leaves to every quart of water. I leave them in the fridge for at least 12 hours. At first I drank the tea hot, using vanilla flavored non-dairy creamer. Great taste, and even a greater after taste. Now, I drink the mint teas cold with nothing added. I've grown to enjoy them.
Before I started drinking this mint tea, there was no way I could urinate after 8pm. My daytime urination was weak at best. Now I've got some serious streams during the daytime, and decent streams in the evening before going to bed. I sleep the night through, and no longer feel like I am sleeping on a urine filled bladder. It's great waking up in the morning after 6 to 8 hours sleep. It's been years since I've been able to do this consistently. I hope this is not an anomaly, because I seem to be getting better everyday.
I've made many other lifestyle changes, that I believe I wrote about in previous posts. I hope this info helps others who suffer from BPH urine retention.
jimjames rich90688
Posted
First, very happy that you found something that is working!
My understanding is that mint is a strong diuretic, which is probably what is helping you. In my case, I've found both coffee and beer to be helpful in regard to increasing the stream and better bladder emptying. Both are diuretics. And while many articles on bph advise against the two, I 've personally found them helpful and also found some articles in support of coffee. Lastly, years ago I was on high protein, low carb diet. Don't think it was Atkins, possibly the Zone diet. In any event, one thing I noticed was that my urine stream was very strong on the diet. Turns out that higher protein diets also have a diuretic effect.
I have also read that some suggest thiazide "water pills" Hydrochlorothiazide. These pills should probably be taken no later than early afternoon or you may end up with too much night time urination. They are also used for lowering blood pressure so should not be taken unless under medical guidance taking into consideration all your health needs.
Lots of things to experiment with if motivated.
But back to mint tea. One thing to note is that while mint is supposedly good for stomach upsets it can be a very strong trigger for reflux and GERD. So, if you have either of those two conditions, tread very cautiously with any type of mint, tea or otherwise.
Richard
rich90688 jimjames
Posted
After so many disappointments, I'm happily surprised that the mint tea is working. I can only hope that it continues to work as I continue to age. One other positive side effect is that I no longer have a pre-ejaculatory fluid retention problem after having sex.
jimjames rich90688
Posted
I understand that many report worseing symptons with coffee, but for me the opposite. The study I was talking about had to do with a group of post operative patients who were routinely catherized I think because of the anathesia used. What they found was that if they gave them a couple of cups of coffee, in most cases the urine started to flow without the catherzation, plus their urination threshold was lowered meaning their bladder didn't fill as much resulting in less retention. This seems to be similar to what I experience but it's really hard to draw generalizations from anecdotal experiences.
I wish I could try the Mint tea, but unfortuntely I do suffer from reflux/GERD if I'm not careful with my food, and the last time I had peppermint tea I paid for it in not a good way.
Can you expand a little on your last sentence. I assume you mean "post-ejaculatory" fluid retention and not "pre-ejaculatory"? Are you saying that after you ejaculate, you don't urinate for awhile?
jimjames
Posted
rich90688 jimjames
Posted
Sorry the mint won't work for you, and sorry the coffee won't work for me, because I like coffee (and love the caffeine for working out) even more than I like the mint.
rich90688 jimjames
Posted
tom_bob jimjames
Posted
but i want to ast a question to the group. to anyone that is or has taken TERAZOSIN, has anyone realized any nerve damage (diabetic neuropathy type) in the hands and/or feet? Please, if you have, respond here and let me know.
thank you so much,
tom bob
stebrunner jimjames
Posted
jimjames stebrunner
Posted
So I simply urinate into the measuring cup and write down how much came out. Let's call this volume "NV" for Natural Void.
Then I empty the cup and caterize into the same cup. Again, mark down how much came out. Let's call this volume "CV" for Catherized Volume.
In the beginning do this every time you urinate or self-catherize noting volume, date and time. If you want a complete diary, you can do the same thing for fluid intake.
In general, your CV should never be more than 400ml. If it is, then you should catherize more often. If your CV volume falls below 150 or so, then you should catherize less often.
A stricter forumula, however, is that the total volume (TV) your bladder holds at any one time (NV plus CV) should never exceed 400ml. That way you will insure that the bladder will start to decompress. So, in this case, if your TV is more than 400ml, then catherize more often to bring it down to 400ml or less.
Of course run all this by your doctor and nurse as they might want more modest goals initially given that you drained 7 liters which is more than I drained at any one time.
In any event, these logs will be helpful both to you and your doctors in terms of monitoring progress and making decisions moving forward as to frequency of self-catherization.
Jim