Self Catherization. An alternative to Turp, Greenlight, HoLEP...?
Posted , 82 users are following.
Since I posted a thread about self-catherization -- more formally called Clean Intermittent Catherization (CIC) -- there have been a few different discussions on the topic in various threads. I thought it might make sense to bring those discussions over to a dedicated thread. With that in mind, I will summarize and/or copy and paste some of what was said before into this thread for better continuity.
My story in a nutshell. 68 years old with BPH probably since my late 20’s. Watch n’Wait strategy with on-and-off trials of Tamsulosin (Flomax) with poor results. Symptoms were the normal retention issues resulting in frequent urination with incomplete emptying, urgency, and having to go to the bathroom at night in increasing frequencies. Near the end, two or three uti’s per year often accompanied by gross hematuria (bleeding).
Two years ago things got significantly worse and I couldn’t urinate on my own without physically pushing against my bladder (Crede Maneuver). That led to another trip to the urologist where ultrasound showed significant retention and hydronephrosis (water in the kidneys). I was told I needed an operation (this facility primarily did Turps) but first I had to rehabilitate my bladder because at the time it was too flaccid (stretched) for a good surgical outcome. I was given the choice of wearing a Foley Catheter for six weeks, or a program of self-catherization (CIC) in order to decompress the bladder. I chose CIC so I didn’t have to wear a Foley 24/7, and also because I felt it put me more in control.
Six weeks later my bladder was rehabilitated to the extent they could do a Turp, and the hydronephrosis was gone. After doing some research and a lot of thinking I decided to put off the Turp due to the potential of irreversible side effects, primarily retrograde ejaculation. Two years later, I am still doing CIC while waiting for newer procedures with better outcomes and fewer side effects.
I will detail my experiences with CIC in following posts -- but to summarize, once mastered, it’s a painless five minute procedure that allows you to empty your bladder completely any time you want. With CIC, I therefore have no retention issues, no urgency, and in most cases sleep 6-8 hours through the night without having to get up and go to the bathroom. No UTI’s in over 18 months. And because my bladder has been partially rehabilitated, I can urinate normally about 50% of the time without using the Crede maneuver. My IPSS Score (International Prostate Symptom Score) would be Zero (the best), albeit with a little mechanical assist.
As of now, nothing that I have read about the various current procedures has tempted me to have an operation. That could, or could not change, in the future, but the nice thing about CIC is that you can stop it any time you want with no repercussions. The caveat is that CIC should be done under the supervision of a doctor who will monitor your BPH as required. Similar to seeing a doctor on a regular basis during a Watch n’ Wait BPH strategy.
I know many of you here have already had operations like Turp, and in most cases people seem pleased with the outcomes. CIC certainly isn’t’ for everyone, and I can understand why someone does not want to carry around a urinary “tool box” with them. On the other hand, with practice, it’s not the traumatic and scary procedure some think. I can honestly say right now that for me it’s about as traumatic as brushing my teeth.
I’m offering my experiences and thoughts on CIC for any of those who haven’t yet made up their mind on an operation. It even can make sense for those of you who don’t need an operation yet, but want to increase their IPSS quality of life score. In fact, wish I had done CIC earlier while on Watchful Waiting. Didn’t realize how much BPH had been affecting me for most of my adult life until I was able to empty my bladder completely.
CIC doesn’t have to be a permanent solution, it could just part of a waiting strategy like I’m on, until better surgical operations are developed with better outcomes and fewer permanent side effects.
For any number of reasons, the majority of urologists don’t seem to offer CIC as an alternative to surgery. My current urologist doesn’t as far as I know, but he’s OK with what I’m doing because it works for me. So, either you have to find a urologist you can convince to go along, or go to some of the major teaching hospitals where CIC is probably more in use and better understood. That is where I was taught, albeit not very well, but that is another story.
Jim
19 likes, 2092 replies
michael72708 jimjames
Posted
Can you explain how you did urethral wash. Did you do it the whole time or decide it was unnecessary in the end? I'm trying to prevent uti. I'm familiar with the colonization concept.
Thanks
jimjames michael72708
Posted
That said, not sure how scientific many of the testimonials are or if even the washes help. Actual scientific studies vary. As to bladder washes, I only did that a couple of times and decided probably not worth the bother and didn't like the potential risks, especially using anything stronger than sterile saline.
What I had done at times is more of a urethral wash with the intent of cleaning out any bacteria that might get pushed into the bladder by the catheter during the CIC process. I have used Microcyn full strength at times, sometimes diluted with sterile saline, and sometimes just sterile saline alone.
My technique uses a small squirt bottle which I fill with one of the above mentioned solutions. Then after prepping the meatus (and squirt bottle tip) with providone idodine swabs, I open the meatus a bit and gently squirt in the solution. Not sure how far in the fluid goes, but after a couple of squirts the fluid squirts back out. Then I cath as usual. You can probably use any number of squirt bottles but the one I ended up with was the 2 oz bottle for a product called Gly Oxide. So first I empty out the Gly Oxide, then thorougly rinsed and then put in the rinsing solution. The head of the GlyOxide bottle lifts off easily making it easy to fill up and the pointed end is not too big yet not too sharp.
Have no idea if this really helps with uti's or colonization, but I did have one run of over six months without any colonization. That said, many urologists don't think colonization is particularly bad unless it's symptomatic and that's when it's called a uti.
My method is top down but some of the folks at the SCI forum go "botto up" meaning they fashioned a device (part of a catheter) where the ffluid begins at the end of the canal rather than in the beginning. The idea here is that if you do it my way (squirt from the outside) you might end up pushing bacteria in.
Jim
jimjames michael72708
Posted
As I mentioned before, I was able to stay uncolonized for some time using the urethral wash but eventually I got colonized. At that point, since I was colonized, I skipped the urethral wash because just spraying into the urethra seems enough to keep me from getting a uti. Frankly it's a lot easier and quicker without the urethral wash and I really don't feel any difference colonized versus not colonized. I haven't had an actual UTI in over a year. Also, the urologists I've spoken to don't seem to have any issues with colonization. That said, if you ever walk into a clinic, or a GP's office, they might try and treat you with antibiotics because of colonization. Don't let them do that unless you speak to a well versed urologist first. The general rule that if you self catherize, you don't treat colonization which is sometimes referred to as an asymptomatic UTI.
If you scroll back an read the thread from the beginning, the different techniques I used should be covered in detail but feel free to ask any questions.
Jim
Carry-on_CMDR jimjames
Posted
I use an antibacterial wipe; for me, Wet Ones are very convenient as they come in individual packets for out-of-home use, as well as in canisters for more economical at-home use.
In four years of doing CIC's, I have NEVER had a bladder or urinary tract infection with this pre-CIC cleansing process.
It's a lot more cponvenient than any urethreal wash or similar proceduyre.
dennis47445 Carry-on_CMDR
Posted
Carry-on CMDR, May I ask,what is the brand that you use? I've been using hydrogen peroxide, and I am new to this.
dennis47445 jimjames
Posted
michael72708 jimjames
Posted
That Microcyn seems like really amazing stuff. Works on all kinds of things that are antibiotic resistant. Plus seems rather non toxic.
Which form have you been buying it in? I see it in a spray bottle as microcyn skin and wound care. Is tht exactly what you've been getting?I think I really want to start using it. The two pharamacies I went to do not carry it.
Thanks!
jimjames michael72708
Posted
Microcyn, Puracyn, and Vertericyn (labled for pets) used to be basically the same thing using what they called a patented Microcyn technology. Occulus, I believe was the manufacturer of Microcyn, and the others were owned and made by other companies using the Microcyn technology which they paid a fee to use. Then there was Vertericyn VF a stronger strength of Vetericyn.
All of the above were discussed in a very long thread in the Care Cure Community entitled Microcyn Bladder Treatment, an open letter to Dr. Young. It would probably take you a day or more to read the entire thread. They are also discussed elsewhere on the net. As of a couple of years ago, Veter
I have tried all of them at various times depending on cost and availability. Puracyn, for example can usually be found at any drug store. As of a couple of years ago, Vertericyn VF seemed to be the most popular due to price and the fact that some diluted it with sterile water to save even more money while some liked it at full strength.
Then apparently the manufacturers of Puracyn and Vetericyn didn't renew their contract with Occulus so they no longer use the patented Microcyn technology, however you can still buy them and the claims on the bottle are similar.
Now there is another product by Occulus called HydroCleanse, which is basically the old Vertericyn VF using the patented Microcyn technology. This seems to be the "go to" product now. And, if you're lucky, Occulus will still give out free samples of HydroCleanse for first time users. Occulus also still manufacturers Microcyn.
Lately, I have been using both an older Vetericyn VF (still has the Microcyn technology) and my free samples of HydroCleanse. I probably used some Puracyn at some point that may not have had the Microcyn technology.
Pretty straight forward huh LOL.
As to my personal use -- like most, I use the spray bottle, not the gel, although some have tried the gel as a lubricant. I did mention earlier, that I used Microcyn as a bladder rinse, but I no longer do that for various reasons.
Right now myself cath technique is very simple. Pull back the meatus slighly with my left hand and then spray a couple of times the tip of the penis and into the meatus with the HydroCleanse. The spray probably only penetrates an inch if that. There are two spray adjustments, I use the softest adjustment. Then I use the catheter and sometimes give an extra spray into the meatus when done.
Previously, I used either Providone Iodine swabs, but they are very messy compared to the spray and that is basically why I switched. That, and I can probably penetrate a half inch or so into the canal. I also at one point (discussed previously) used a squirt bottle and pushed the HydroCleanse all the way up the canal. I no longer do that primarily because it takes longer and also costs less this way. Also, since I haven't had any UTI's, it seem to work. That said, I am colonized (no symptons) but that is usually the case with self catherization and just to much of a PITA to prevent that.
Is Micocyn, Puracyn, HydroCleanse, etc, any more effective than sterile water? I don't know and a lot of people don't know. There are no published studies that I know of with self cathing and the anecdotal reports, while very positive, have to be taken cautiously, and I again wonder if some of the same results could have come from flushing out the system with sterile saline or sterile water. Again, no studies. Also, the company, Occulus, also seems to go about things in an unorthodox way and you can do some research on them if you want.
Still, I use HydroCleanse and probably will continue to, but if I ran out, probably might just go to the corner drugstore and buy some Puracyn. Or maybe not -- because somewhere in the back of my mind is all that Occulus promotion of their "patented technology". And I can be sucker for that kind of promotion like anyone else! Good luck.
Jim
I can't recommend or not recommend either HydroCleanse or the other products (Puracyn and Vetericyn) still on the market. I continue to use HydroCle
michael72708 jimjames
Posted
I'm really trying to prevent colonization because I hade a psa spike from 8 to 15 and am trying to determine if it's due to a UTI or something worse. Hard to do when you're cathing and reintroducing UTI's.Thanks for the help!
jimjames michael72708
Posted
As far as colonization is concerned, that's hard to avoid with self catherization. I had about a six month run of no colonization but at that point I was using the squirt bottle and probably using fluid within the 30 day period.
There is a difference between colonization and having an UTI. First, colonization is asymptomatic. You might (or might not) notice the urine a little cloudier than usual, but that is about it. If you use a urine dipstick (good idea) you will find that the leucocytes are positive but the nitrites are negative. It is possible to have a real UTI with positive leucocytes and negative nitrities, but in most cases it's just colonization, and especially if you're asymptomatic.
In the ideal world probably best to have no UTIs and no colonization, but most urologists don't think colonization is a big deal, and to do self catherization without colonization requires more work and a little luck. I just finally gave in and went the easy way. So right now, I have colonization but haven't had a UTI in over a year. I doubt very much if colonization would affect your PSA but you could look into it.
Jim
jimjames
Posted
Jim
Jim
dennis47445 jimjames
Posted
John-T jimjames
Posted
Very interesting subject on self-cath. I have an enlarge prostate and my urlologist wants to operate but that could take about 2 months of wait time, I was proposed the self-cath and not quite ready for it, I have been wearing a permanent catheter for 1 month now, not sure if keeping it for so long can help my streched bladder from too much retention to recuperate slowly or it would be best to self-cath. Before putting the catheter I was urinating but not emptying but after on week of wearing the catheter I was given a systoscopy and the urologist ask me to try to go pee and I couldn`t anymore even after a few hours and drinking about 4 water bottles so they put back the catheter, so I`m kind of wondering why now I can`t feel the urge to urinate. In any case I will try to mind myself to start the self-cath, if you have more tips for me send them my way, thanks a lot
John
jimjames John-T
Posted
Not a doctor and never had a Foley, but my guess is that it might take time to get your detrusor muscles back in motion after not using them for so long.
When offered a TURP operation, I was given a choice between a FOLEY or self catherization (CIC) to be able to more fully empty my bladder while waiting for the operation and also to help decompress my stretched bladder so it hopefully would regain some elasticity.
I choose CIC and have continued ever since, skipping the operation. You can read more about my experiences in the thread, but in your case I see no harm, and only upside in trying CIC. For one thing it definitely empty your bladder whenever you want to. For another it will use your detrusor muscles (should you choose) which hopefully will bring them back to life. As a big bonus you will be free of wearing a Foley 24/7. And, if CIC agrees with you, it will offer you an alternative to surgery without any sexual side effects such as retrograde ejaculation which is common with TURP and Green Light, to name two.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, I had a rough time with CIC for a few weeks, but once I got the hang it became virtually painless and routine. My only advice if you do this is to make sure your medical team will agressively treat any UTI's you might develop in the beginning. My team was reluctant and I got into trouble.
Also, the right catheter can make a difference. I , like several here, like the Coloplast Speedicath with its hydrophilic coating. Goes in real easy. They generally start you with size 14French, but after some practice you may be able to drop down to 12French which is thinner and more flexible. I use the one with the coude (curved) tip which is designed to go around the prostate without snagging it.
You may be one of the lucky ones who gets the hang of it right away, but if you're like me, be prepared for at least a couple of weeks of discomfort. At least for me, it certainly was worth putting up with it for a short period of time.
You can always get an operation down the road -- some interesting new procedures being developed like PAE for example -- but learning CIC will give you a non surgical alternative that just might be enough. It might even rehabilitate your bladder to the extent that at some point you may be able to stop CIC altogether, or at least cut down the frequency dramatically.
If posible, see a urologist well versed in CIC, but sometimes this is not possible. In any event, the procedure is not rocket science. Lots of advice here as well as videos on YouTube, mostly by the various manufacturers.
Hope things work out.
Jim
John-T jimjames
Posted
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly very well appreciated, great tips you are giving me, as of now I say 3 different urologist and they all want to operate, first one is with the old TURP method which I don't want, I say a laser green light expert and a laser holep expert and after reading a lot on these 3 methods and hearing best comments for the holep method, this would be my method of choice but with the reverse ejaculation side effect it makes me hesitate a little. I'm most likely will try the CIC and hope for the best, right now the size of my catheter is 12 fr, emergency stafff had hard time inserting the 14fr which caused me some bleeding and a lot of pain, so i would most likely try the 12fr, do you suggest the standing up method or it depends on the individual, I also say in the thread that you talk about the PVR to never have more than 300ml in the bladder but how does one know, should we keep a log at everything we drink and everything we urinate before doing the CIC. How about infections, is it better to wear plastic gloves.
Thanks Jim
jimjames John-T
Posted
It's somewhat counter intuitive but sometimes they actually go up in size when having difficulty navigating the prostate. Also, different catheters have different characteristics. The Coloplast Speedicath 12F, for example, is quite flexible and might kink if it meets resistance, so I'd probably go with 14F and hopefully it will go in easier because of its slippery coating. Also, the coude tip might help but you have to order them with the coude tip.
Gloves can be worn but probably not necessary. Most just wash their hands with soap and water. I do that sometimes but often just use hand sanitizer or nothing at all since with the technique I use my hands never touch the part of the catheter that goes inside. But starting out, soap and water and/or sanitizer should be OK.
The rule of thumb is that if more than 400ml comes out when you self cath, then increase the number of times you do it a day. If less than 150ml comes out, decrease the number of intervals. Another formula is not to have more than 400 ml in your bladder at any one time although I think the first formula (how much comes out) should be fine to start out with especially since you're not doing much in the way of natural voids.
It's easy to figure out. Just aim the catheter into a plastic receptacle or measuring cup and write down how many cc comes out. I kept a pretty complete log in the beginning which included date and time, the amount of natural void if any (always try to naturally void first), then how much came out with the catheter, and any other notes I might make such as if I changed the size catheter, any issues, etc. I don't log it any more but in the beginning it can help you come up with the right schedule. Most people start with 4-6 times a day, especially if you are not naturally voided at all. Then you can adjust based on how much comes out with the catheter.
I have only done it standing over the toilet (or a receptacle) but I've read it can be done sitting or lying down as well.
Not sure where you're locatd, but here in the states the catheter companies are pretty good with free samples so you can try different ones.
As to retrograde ejaculation, if you haven't experienced it, you can do a trial run by taking the drug Tamsulosin (Flomax). Tamsulosin causes retro in most people. It may not bother you at all but it does bother some people.
Jim
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
John-T jimjames
Posted
Thanks again for great advises, I'm trying to motivate myself to do the CIC and I'm almost ready mentally to try it, I've watched youtube videos on it to become more insensative to it, my only fear is not to be able to pass the point to the entrace of the bladder and of course some pain from the cath itself and maybe some bleeding. As for retrograde ejaculation I did experienced it 6 years ago when I had a blockage and was taking Flowmax (Tamsulosin) it felt weird and scary, so I know what to expect from that, seems that a lot of people here are against operation and are saying that I might still have problems urinating so it seems that the major problem is the bladder that is not doing is job or just too stretched from all the previous retention, in any case what I find strange is that before the catheter and systoscopy I was urinating fine but not emptying but now I can't even urinate when I tried after that day of the systoscopy. You're a great insipration to me Jim
thanks
John
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message, well urologist all of them want to operate, as mentioned before, methods proposed where : TURP, green light laser or Holep laser, after many reads seems that Holep is the best of the 3, right now I'm taking Flowmax (Tamsulosin), I'm also worried that even after the operation I still won't be able to urinate, which is strange because before all that episode that started about 1 month ago, I was urinating fine but felt nauseated so I went to the ER and my creatinine level was way high at 230 because of the retention in the bladder and blood pressure was way up over 180/100 so I was giving blood pressure medication. After wearing the cath for 5 days they did a systoscopy and afterward I went home no cath but could not urinate or did not even feel like urinating even after drinking 3 water bottles so I went back to the ER and had 750 ml in my bladder so again they put the catheter that I have now for 1 month and on a waiting list for holep operation which will only be in about 2 months. I appreciate your help
thanks
John
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
The nurse also had problems putting the catheter on so she used a 12FR and put a lot of gel first in the penis and then it went it much easier,
Good luck to you too
John
John-T jimjames
Posted
Do you think by putting more KY gel in the penis before CIC would help more to insert the cath with less resistance
thanks much appreciated
John
jimjames John-T
Posted
That said, I found the hydrophilic catheter to be better than those requiring lube. With the hydrophilic, you do not use lube because it already has a very slippery coating. My preferece is the hydrophilic Speedicath by Coloplast.
As to your concern about not being able to urinate at all, I really think it's a temporary thing, but of course, unless you self cath to get your detrusor muscles back in action, then you're doomed to a Foley for now.
Curious, how much retention and what kind of day to day symptons did you have before they put in the Foley?
Jim
jimjames John-T
Posted
Jim
John-T jimjames
Posted
So I hope I can do the CIC and start to heal and decide if I will do the surgery or not.
Thanks
John
jimjames John-T
Posted
Can't say and not qualified to dx what's going on with your kidneys from what you've said, but a standard ultrasound of the kidneys should give you and your doctor something to look at along with the blood tests.
If urine is backing up into the kidneys, as sometimes happens with retention, you might have what is called hydronephrosis, which is basically water in the kidneys where the urine reluxes backwards instead of just out. If they didn't run an ultrasound, I'm surprised, and would definitely ask for it.
In fact, the ultrasound just before I started CIC a few years back showed hydronephrosis (in both kidneys) and that is what prompted the urologist to recommend the TURP. The good news is that hydronephrosis usually clears within a week or two of fully emptying your bladder with CIC. So you really don't need an operation to protect your kidneys as I understand it, you just need to completely empty your bladder. And in fact, if you've been self cathing for a few weeks the ultrasound probably won't show it but a good test to get just to make sure. High blood pressure is also sometimes associated with retention, and again, if that is the case self cathing can take care of that a well as an operation.
This is not to say that you shouldn't have an operation, it's really a personal choice, but just to say that self cathing is an alternative. Either a long term alternative or a short term one. Unfortunately, most docs only present self cathing as a short term process prior to surgery, but many like myself are quite happy with it a an alternative to surgery.
Jim
michaelmike John-T
Posted
Read your post and wanted to say that CIC is a painless procedure, and a great solution to get your bladder voiding normally . Initially it may seem scary, but actually there is nothing difficult about it. My urologist wanted me to do it when I had a hydronephosis. He had 2 nurses train me. One said "mind over matter" to get my courage up and it turned out to be a great relief physiologically. If you can try the Coloplast Speedicath , it is the easiest catheter in my opinion. You might want to try the one with coude tip, oriented properly, if there is a little obstacle in passing the prostate. A foley Catheter is a much more burdensome approach, and prone to infection.
If you do start Self Cathing, you should do it with the supervision of a doctor , as you may get a UTI , which should be treated right away. I see you haven't posted in a while so you may be doing OK. Good luck.
John-T michaelmike
Posted
I'll keep you posted
Thanks
John
jimjames John-T
Posted
Jim
John-T jimjames
Posted
I just need to make myself come to term with the fear of CIC, not sure what I'm afraid of, most likely the fact that It will stuck when I try to push it in the bladder.
I'll keep you posted
Thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
jimjames John-T
Posted
Jim
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I`ll keep you posted on my next move, much appreciated Ken
John
John-T jimjames
Posted
All I know is that I can`t spend another 4 to 6 months wearing a full time catheter.
I`ll keep you posted
Thanks for your precious information
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I'm trying to call my present urologist secretary but no answer and voice mail is full, did leave her a message 3 days ago, never called me back that is just to show you how we are just a number here.
Thanks for your help
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Yes my present Urologist I finally got a hold of the secretaries and I have an appointment tusday to change my cath but I told them that I want time without the cath to see if I can urinate.
I'll keep you posted
Thanks
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the heads up, actually it went terrible, I met with the urologist because I wanted to touch base and see what was going on with the operation, he replied that he's the only one doing the HOLEP operation and he has 70 other patients waiting for an operation plus he said summer holidays are coming so it won't happen for the next 6 months if I'm lucky. He proposed CIC I said ok so I went with the nurse, she brought all the equipement to the washroom, she removed my cath and I started to bleed a lot, she them began to open the catheter package and started to introduct it all of a sudden a lot of blood came out so she ran to get the urologist, I began to feel ill and within 5 sec. I passed out and fell on the concrete floor from my chair and bang my head noze and teeth really bad, I woke up on the floor alone, sat back on my chair and the nurse came back in alone and freaked to see my bleeding and all equipment on the floor, anyways she took me to a bed cleaned me up, i rested a bit, then she told me that the urologist still want you to CIC, imagine that he did not even come to see me, I was still bleeding so I told the nurse that it's not an option and even her said that I was not a good candidate for CIC so she put back the catherer, don't know what to do anymore, I have another appointment with the other urologist for green light on the 7 th of July for a cystoscopy so that's where I am now, I began searching for natural methods and found few chinese sites that have potent herbs and regimen to cure this disease by remove heat toxins from prostate and restoring blood flow and shrinking the prostate so what else can I do at this point,
Hope you're doing ok
John
jimjames John-T
Posted
Sorry you had such a bad experience. Not sure how much of it was the sefl cathing as opposed to the bleeding pior (if I read your post correctly) when they removed the Foley.
I will say that I almost fainted the first time I self cathed while being assisted by the PA. I also had some bleeding and pain for at least the first couple of weeks along with urgency and a sensation of needing to urinate even when my bladder was full.
I was told all these symptons are normal for some people although most here seemed to have initially tolerated self cathing a lot better than I did.
I say hang in there and if you can get through the first three or four weeks things will get significantly better. I was in a really dark place the first few weeks of self catherization and reall thought my life was ruined for good. Very different from today when self cathing not only rehabilitated my bladder to the extent that I don't have to do it very often but when I do self cath it's about as traumatic as brushing my teeth and takes much less time.
So try and look beyond the bad part because in most cases the body does adjust remarkably well to self cathing and once it does you will wonder what all the fuss and worry was all about.
Jim
John-T jimjames
Posted
I'll keep you posted
Thanks for your encouragement
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message actually it was at 02:30 pm just came back, news are not so good or at least dissapointing for me. The urologist did a prostate/rectal ultrasound. I had a chance to talk briefly with him following the procedure, he told me that my prostate is 100gram and need to be operated, he says he will remove 80% of it, I also asked him about medication and he said that i would take a year to work, he also said that at first glance it doesn't seem to be any trace of cancer but that would be some analysis of tissues after the HOLEP procedure, I also have a tentative operation date of the 26 of July but no guarantee, so I seriously entertaining the thoughts of CIC but I still have this fear of inserting this 16 inches cath inside of me so I have to find a way to overcome this mental block. I had ordered from Coloplast some samples and funny enough I just received them as I arrive from the hospital . They are not lubricated and are 14fr, I find them very thin and flimsy so I sent an email to the company to ask if they could send me that model:
Speedicath hydrophilic lubricated straight tip, I ask for 16fr and 1 14fr just to see the difference, in any case not sure when or how but I have to be in front of again hospital staff to get a proper training.
So now I have another appointment tomorrow Tuesday at 09:00 am in systo dept. with the green light urologist so not sure if I want to go or if it will make any differences since I know now that my prostate is huge.
I'll keep you posted thanks
jimjames John-T
Posted
Jim
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Check out the literature on fluoroquinolone-associated Achilles tendon rupture. Cipro is a fluroqinolone. Personally, I had a bad case of achilles
tendonitis after several rounds of fluroquinolone's, including Cipro. Can't be positive it was the cause, but my doc started substituting non-fluroquinolone antibiotics moving forward.
Jim
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
I will post another tread today to go in details on my procedures.
I'll keep you posted
Thanks and God bless you
John
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted
John-T kenneth1955
Posted
Thanks for the message,
I understand what you mean, I told them the samething that I need to relax a while so I went downstairs at the hospital cafeteria and had a salad, an apple juice and later a coffee. I then tried again but couldn't, I ran the water, through some on me, I tried everything and it was blocked but I could feel my bladder getting fuller.
Later I went for a walk for about 30 minutes around the hospital, tried again many other times for a total of about 4 hours. I did ask for the CIC but the lady in charge was not available until the next day and also after that cystoscopy I was sore and caught an infection so it wasn't the time to try CIC, so now back with my cath and the medication that I'm taking combo of Tamsulosin and Avodart. I will re-schedule a CIC when I feel a little better.
Thanks for your moral support, I hope you're doing ok with your procedures
I'll keep you posted
Thanks Ken
John
kenneth1955 John-T
Posted