Self Catherization. An alternative to Turp, Greenlight, HoLEP...?
Posted , 82 users are following.
Since I posted a thread about self-catherization -- more formally called Clean Intermittent Catherization (CIC) -- there have been a few different discussions on the topic in various threads. I thought it might make sense to bring those discussions over to a dedicated thread. With that in mind, I will summarize and/or copy and paste some of what was said before into this thread for better continuity.
My story in a nutshell. 68 years old with BPH probably since my late 20’s. Watch n’Wait strategy with on-and-off trials of Tamsulosin (Flomax) with poor results. Symptoms were the normal retention issues resulting in frequent urination with incomplete emptying, urgency, and having to go to the bathroom at night in increasing frequencies. Near the end, two or three uti’s per year often accompanied by gross hematuria (bleeding).
Two years ago things got significantly worse and I couldn’t urinate on my own without physically pushing against my bladder (Crede Maneuver). That led to another trip to the urologist where ultrasound showed significant retention and hydronephrosis (water in the kidneys). I was told I needed an operation (this facility primarily did Turps) but first I had to rehabilitate my bladder because at the time it was too flaccid (stretched) for a good surgical outcome. I was given the choice of wearing a Foley Catheter for six weeks, or a program of self-catherization (CIC) in order to decompress the bladder. I chose CIC so I didn’t have to wear a Foley 24/7, and also because I felt it put me more in control.
Six weeks later my bladder was rehabilitated to the extent they could do a Turp, and the hydronephrosis was gone. After doing some research and a lot of thinking I decided to put off the Turp due to the potential of irreversible side effects, primarily retrograde ejaculation. Two years later, I am still doing CIC while waiting for newer procedures with better outcomes and fewer side effects.
I will detail my experiences with CIC in following posts -- but to summarize, once mastered, it’s a painless five minute procedure that allows you to empty your bladder completely any time you want. With CIC, I therefore have no retention issues, no urgency, and in most cases sleep 6-8 hours through the night without having to get up and go to the bathroom. No UTI’s in over 18 months. And because my bladder has been partially rehabilitated, I can urinate normally about 50% of the time without using the Crede maneuver. My IPSS Score (International Prostate Symptom Score) would be Zero (the best), albeit with a little mechanical assist.
As of now, nothing that I have read about the various current procedures has tempted me to have an operation. That could, or could not change, in the future, but the nice thing about CIC is that you can stop it any time you want with no repercussions. The caveat is that CIC should be done under the supervision of a doctor who will monitor your BPH as required. Similar to seeing a doctor on a regular basis during a Watch n’ Wait BPH strategy.
I know many of you here have already had operations like Turp, and in most cases people seem pleased with the outcomes. CIC certainly isn’t’ for everyone, and I can understand why someone does not want to carry around a urinary “tool box” with them. On the other hand, with practice, it’s not the traumatic and scary procedure some think. I can honestly say right now that for me it’s about as traumatic as brushing my teeth.
I’m offering my experiences and thoughts on CIC for any of those who haven’t yet made up their mind on an operation. It even can make sense for those of you who don’t need an operation yet, but want to increase their IPSS quality of life score. In fact, wish I had done CIC earlier while on Watchful Waiting. Didn’t realize how much BPH had been affecting me for most of my adult life until I was able to empty my bladder completely.
CIC doesn’t have to be a permanent solution, it could just part of a waiting strategy like I’m on, until better surgical operations are developed with better outcomes and fewer permanent side effects.
For any number of reasons, the majority of urologists don’t seem to offer CIC as an alternative to surgery. My current urologist doesn’t as far as I know, but he’s OK with what I’m doing because it works for me. So, either you have to find a urologist you can convince to go along, or go to some of the major teaching hospitals where CIC is probably more in use and better understood. That is where I was taught, albeit not very well, but that is another story.
Jim
19 likes, 2092 replies
frank74205 jimjames
Posted
Wow, Great news Jim James, At 87 with BPH I iwas thinking of Uro Lift--If i quailfy?
Have you thought about this procedure?I read where it's not like Turp> There is no cutting away the prostate. I also have been thinking about sel-cath. I have a foley catheter in 4 months now.Do you know if waiting to long will make the bladder worse?
i like what you say about self cath.
dennis47445 frank74205
Posted
Frank, my wife's friend's dad, self-caths every four hours. He is 87 years old and as far as I know, has no problem self-cathing. He is a little wobbley standing, and is not in the best physical shape, but manages to self-cath on his own.
kenneth1955 dennis47445
Posted
johnclen kenneth1955
Posted
John
jimjames frank74205
Posted
Hi Frank,
I have given thought to Urolift, PAE and other less invasive procedures, but at this point self cathing is working so well that I'm comfortable to stay where I am.
4 months is a long time to have a foley in. In your shoes I would seriously consider self cathing or at least a suprapubic. Either would be preferable to your current situation.
As to "waiting too long", if what you mean is will delaying an operation too long be harmful to your bladder -- the answer is "no" as long as you are emptying it fully daily which is what self cathing does.
Jim
jimjames frank74205
Posted
Jim
Howard31850 jimjames
Posted
I seem to maintain a pvr of about 250ml by self-cathing twice a day. Do you think this is ok or do I need to cath more to keep the residual as close to zero as possible? I am comfortable during the day but do get up twice during the night to pee even though I restrict fluids after 7 pm.
Thanks for all your help.
Neil
jimjames Howard31850
Posted
Hi Neil,
Since PVR is only part of the story, I'm assuming your total bladder volume (Natural urination plus PVR) is pretty much always under 400ml, which I believe you previously said it is.
First, if you haven't already done it, I would make sure your pvr is only 250ml a day (and total volume under 400ml) by randomly cathing off schedule now and then and checking the math.
If that checks out then a pvr of 250ml falls within accepted guidelines for your twice a day schedule. That said, if you want to further experiment, you could throw in another one or two cath's a day and see if there is any overall improvement in your natural voids, bladder tone, etc. You don't have to do this every day, just maybe for a few days, then go back to your regular schedule, etc. Reasonable experimentation isn't a bad thing because it can give you real feedback that schedules sometimes can't. Unfortunately doc's hardly ever ask us to experiment for a number of reasons including their underestimation of a patient's ability to meaningful participate and impact their own treatment.
I experimented quite a bit with cath schedules, etc, including random checking just for the purpose, of well, random checking, to make sure that what I thought was in my bladder was actually what was in my bladder. And again, my significant improvements, where PVRs are often under 50ml, and where I can sometimes go for days/weeks without self cathing at all, did not happen until the second year, so don't necessarily expect day to day improvements. Patience is important.
Jim
frank74205 jimjames
Posted
thanks for all the info!!
frank74205 jimjames
Posted
thanks ,Jim
Howard31850 jimjames
Posted
Thanks Jim - we are all very fortunate to have you guide us. I for one cannot get any answers from my uro on these problems.
I do average about 200ml free peeing before I self cath and take out another 250 or so. I'll try your suggestions and see what I discover.
Some days I don't self cath at all and still find when I self-cath the next day after missing a day that my pvr is still close to 250ml. If I did not self cath at all but always had a resiual of 250ml after free peeing do you think that would be a problem over time if the residual stayed at that value and did not increase?
Thanks again.
Neil
jimjames frank74205
Posted
Hi Frank,
Getting used to self cathing really varies with the individual. From what I've read elsewhere, and with some of the stories related here -- many people adapt very quickly. Personally, I had a very difficult first couple of weeks, compounded by a urinary tract infection -- perhaps two -- that was not treated adequately by my medical team. A few months later, with my urinary tract infection behind me, things became a lot more manageable. Today, when I do have to self cath, which is not anymore even on a daily basis, it's about like brushing my teeth in terms of inconvenience, just takes a little less time.
Besides the initial physical trauma, I also experienced a significant mental trauma feeling like my life as I knew it was over, now having to use tubes to go to the bathroom. I feel absolutely none of this now but looking back to the beginning it was very real and frightening. So, if anyone feels this way, just to let you know that the feeling will pass and at some point in the future you will wonder what the big deal about self cathing was all about.
As to frequency, initially it is determined probably by your urologist based on the amount of retention you have. Six times per day is a figure many start out with who have significant retention. Later, you fine tune it by doing a void log which notes the amount of natural urination and what comes out of the catheter. The rule of thumb is that if more than 400ml comes out of the catheter, you increase the frequency. If less than 100ml comes out, you decrease the frequency. I fine tuned it more later on based on other factors such as the combined volume in my bladder at any one time which includes not only the catherized volume but any natural void as well.
Jim
jimjames Howard31850
Posted
Neil,
I was probably carrying around 400-600ml of urine in my bladder for years before I developed hydronephrosis (urine backing up into my kidneys) and my bladder got to the point where for all practical purposes it stopped functioning. So that's when I started self cathing, pretty much at the last possible moment.
So, sounds like you're a lot better off now then I was years before I started self cathing, so sure you could probably stop self cathing altogether and maybe get by for years as long as you monitored your kidney function (blood tests and imaging) and didn't develop too many UTI's. Just keep in mind that things with the prostate bladder tend to get worse over time if you leave everything alone.
Have you done the I-PSS score test? If not, you really should. I believe I started a thread on it. If your score isn't too bad, and again if your kidney function tests and UTI frequency are OK, then I don't see why you can't back off from self cathing to one degree or another. On the other hand, if your score is not so good, then self cathing could help. And certainly, if you start getting too many UTI's or have any issues with your kidneys, then you really don't have a choice but to self cath, do a procedure, or try some of the drugs and live with their side effects.
Jim
jimjames
Posted
Like to add that I wish I had started self cathing years before I did. I remember even in my 30's and 40's getting up during a movie two or three times to go to the bathroom. I had UTI's yearly, sometimes more. Up three or four times every night to go to the bathroom. Developed a large diverticulum (pouch) in my bladder because it was under so much pressure.
Today, even when I don't cath, I can easily sit through a three hour movie without a bathroom break and wake up only once a night to go to the bathroom. Have had only one symptomatic UTI in the last 18 months or so and even that one probably could have been avoided had I not become careless one evening with my cathing technique.
Jim
frank74205 jimjames
Posted
Hi Jim. You have given great info,my urologist says why do you want to self cath? Let us try to help you get out of retention>When i first was caterized i had 873 ml this was in June--second void july 660 ml August780 ml Sept i don't have. I'm still taking dustasteride ,and flomax,
Do you think their could be a chance the medicine could work, get me out of rentention?With foley catheter after a nights rest,in the morning my out put is around 2000.ml What does PVR MEAN?
THANKS VERY MUCH JIM FOR ALL THIS INFO!!
Uro,wanted to do a Turp> at almost 87 years old with all the bad news i'm reading on this forum ,it doesn't sound to good.
jimjames frank74205
Posted
Hi Frank,
PVR stands for post void residual. It's the amount of urine left in your bladder after you do a natural void. For a healthy young male it should be close to zero or at least under 50ml. For an older adult 100ml is often considered acceptable. Above 100ml doctors often start monitoring the situation and often begin to prescribe drugs like flomax to empty the bladder more completely. PVR can be easily measured in a urologists office with a portable bladder scanning device. If can also be measured via a catheter but that's really not necessary or adviseable, unless the person is already on a catheter program.
In your case, what you're talking about isn't retention, but what sounds like a 24-hour urine output? If so, 2000ml sounds normal. I assume you had a retention problem prior to being put on a Foley.
Jim
Howard31850 jimjames
Posted
I guess I have conflicting information about my BPH. My IPSS score is 30 which it was 9 weeks ago before my PAE. But my recent creatinine blood test was very good and I have never had a UTI! But my prostate is 300gm though no median lobe or diverticula from a recent cystoscopy last June. I have been on alfuzosin and dutasteride for over 10 years with all the usual bad side effects. I had hoped I could get offf them after the PAE but not so. My PVR seems to be pretty steady at around 250ml after peeing 200 ml or so. I should self-cath more I know as I am waging a losing battle over time (I am 67). I bet my IPSS score would really come down if I did more self-caths now that I think of it that way as well as reversing the inevitable decline of bladder function over time. I could probably get off those awful drugs too. That is a lot of gain for a little more cathing! Thanks as always - you really help us all think it through. Neil
jimjames Howard31850
Posted
An I-PSS score of 30 is severe, so it's obvious that you had to do something. What I don't understand is why you are still on alfuzosin and dutasteride? If it were me, and I didn't like the side effects, I would stop both drugs and take up any slack by increasing the frequency of self cathing. As I understand it, the purpose of those drugs is to cut down your PVR by one mechanism or another. Self cathing can do the same thing without their specfic side effects.
So, yeah, get off those drugs, and tailor your self cath schedule so you still have acceptable bladder volumes. If that means going from 2 times a day to four (or even six) so be it. At some point it might come back down to two or even less like it did with me. But in any event, it's your body and you have to weigh the pro's and con's of cathing more rather than taking drugs with you don't like.
BTW I just did my I-PSS score and it was 7-9 which is mild to boderline moderate. If it wasn't for the "weak stream" question -- which I really think is more of a diagnostic question than a quality of life question -- I would be a 3 or 5 which is like a 15 year old! Prior to CIC I was 30 plus, "severe".
Jim
Jim
Howard31850 jimjames
Posted
frank74205 jimjames
Posted
Hi Jim, Yes , I have a retention problem. Ond day i found this mass on my stomach,no pain,went to a Uro and they did a ultra sound. I was caterized .700 ml came out. I am greatful to you for all the info on CIC. My URO.never mentioned it ,i was put on a foley catheter and had PVR every month,also kept me on Avordat and flomax. It's been 5 monrhs ,still have complete rentention. Does selcath 7 times a day,seem normal?
Thanks,for all this info.
kenneth1955 frank74205
Posted
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Kenneth and Frank,
Frank, are you sure you described Ken's situation correctly. Ken isn't able to urinate naturally at all which suggests his bladder IS atonic for now. Cathing 6 times a day is normal in this situation, as are the void amounts Kenneth noted. Unless I'm missing something, asking for a medicine that allows you "not to go alot" makes no sense.
Jim
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
Jim I'm peeing fine. I asked my urologist for Frank. He said that is normal to be doing CIC 7 times a day. He never told me a med. He F told me to tell Frank to talk to his urologist because he think his going to much Ken
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Ken,
Sorry, got things backwards so let me try again
Frank said he has "complete urinary retention" which I assume means he isn't having any natural voids and is therefore relying solely on self cathing to empty his bladder. It also suggests an atonic bladder for now.
Asssuming this, a self cath schedule of around 6x/day is normal. Therefore I don't understand why your urologist thinks Frank is "going" too much or needs to take meds to go less.
Hope this makes more sense.
Jim
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
jimjames kenneth1955
Posted
Hi Ken,
I was a little thrown off about the "medication" part but sounds like we're all on the same page now. Thanks for your help and patience.
Jim
kenneth1955 jimjames
Posted
Howard31850 jimjames
Posted
HI Jim,
During the day my cathing is pretty good: NVs about 150ml and CVs about 250ml. Just before bed at around midnight I get the same numbers.
Lately I've been sleeping through the night (helped by tylenol) but when I get up at 6am I cannot NV and my CV is around 650ml. The rest of the day is ok ( 4 times total per 24 hours).
Should I get up in the middle of the night and cath to keep this large number down? Problem then is it is hard to get back to sleep but I worry I could be damaging my bladder with these large volumes. They are fairly consistent every morning.
Thanks. Hope you are doing well.
Neil
jimjames Howard31850
Posted
650 is not too bad if it's just once. That said, under 400 is ideal because over that it is stretched some, so you have to weigh the benefits of keeping it under 400 against a full night's sleep.
Is that regular Tylenol or Tylenol PM? Regular Tylenol could cause retention but Tylenol PM (contains an antihistamine) could cause even more retention. That might be why you get no NV when you wake up, or it just could be that you can't NV because your bladder is so full. Have you ever been able to do a NV with 650ml in your bladder when not using Tylenol?
If you do decide to get up at night to void, you could experiment just doing a quick NV (no cathing) into a urinal by your bed which should be less awakening than cathing. Then you would check things in the morning to see if you're under 400 and go from there.
Jim