Self Catherization: Issues and Problems
Posted , 44 users are following.
Self catherization (CIC) is a proven and tested method of emptying your bladder completely. And while most people find it an easy and painless procedure, understandably some have problems, especially in the beginning. This thread then deals with problems and issues people may encounter with CIC.
For those not self cathing, or for more general information on the topic, there is an ongoing thread here:
2 likes, 1488 replies
tom2017 jimjames
Posted
In April of 2015 I had the green Light Laser for enlarged prostate. The operation was a success but I was still retaining big time. It was discovered that I had another problem. My bladder was not squeezing the urine out. I was trained to self cath 4X per day. I never got used to it. My urologist said he'd like to try a drug called bethanachol. WHAT A GODSEND! I take this pill 3X per day and I have a young man's stream. (I'm 77)
I'll be on them from now on but so what? This doc gave me my life back.
frank74205 tom2017
Posted
Hi Tom, God bless you for this info.I'm 87 and i'm going to get GL also.
I have a concern about my bladder also.Did yot have complete urine retention before you had surgery? I have been self cathing 5 x a day for 2 months now. Did you have the urodynamics test before you had the green light surgery?
Thanks very much Tom for this info
jimjames tom2017
Posted
Tom, that's great. You hear a lot about smooth muscle relaxants like Tamusolin (flomax) but not much about bladder stimulants like bethanachol. From the little I've read, it seems indicated in cases like yours where the obstruction is gone. I assume this is for safety reasons to prevent high bladder pressures.
Do you know what your post void residuals are now that you're on it? Do you know the volumes of your voids? Assuming that the bethanachol has kept your bladder volumes down, it's possible that your bladder has been rehabilitated some in the same way that mine has been through self cathing. Have you tried to go off bethanachol to see if things are working better now?
Jim
tom2017 jimjames
Posted
I have not tried to see what would happen if I went "cold turkey" but I have noticed that when from time to time when I miss a pill or two I still go.
Perhaps I'll try quitting to see what happens. (Or DOESN'T happen.)
tom2017 frank74205
Posted
cartoonman tom2017
Posted
Tom, by "Not complete retention but getting there," do you mean your "output" has dropped, and you are having to pee more often or cath to empty? Please clarify!
tom2017 cartoonman
Posted
cartoonman tom2017
Posted
hank1953 tom2017
Posted
Do you have any side effects with bethanachol ?
Hank
tom2017 hank1953
Posted
No adverse reactions of any kind. As a matter of fact there was a bonus! Several years ago I had 12-13 inches of colon removed. Not cancer but diverticuliris. (The op is the same for both.) Whenever you are operated on "down there" there's a darn good chance you won't be "regiular" again. I developed chronic constipation. I'm OK because I have a damn good gastro man.
Anyway, I was talking to gastro man and told him that the urologist had put me on bethanichol. He said not to be surprised if the bethanichol helped with constipation also. He explained that just as bethanichol helped the bladder muscles it also helps the miscles responsible for intestinal motility.
hank1953 tom2017
Posted
Thanks Tom,
Great! I'll ask for it when I see my GP.
Hank
zdzislaw jimjames
Posted
jimjames zdzislaw
Posted
ZD,
You referring to bethanachol? I had never heard of it until Tom posted which is a little odd since so many of us have bladder issues. That said, based on what Tom said, and from what I've recently read, it deserves consideration. Definitely cross check this, but I believe it's not recommended if there is an obstruction such as a lot of us have from our prostate. The logic here I guess is that the bethanachol induced contractions could do damage if the urethra is obstructed. How much of an obstruction contraindicates its use I couldn't find. In Tom's case, he already had a TURP or similar so no obstruction just a stretched bladder.
I would definitely do run it by your doc and maybe do more research on it.
Jim
jimjames
Posted
I read a little more and it's definitely contraindicated if you have bladder outlet obstruction. It also seems controversial even if you don't have it. That said, if I for example a TURP like procedure to remove the obstruction, and I still had voiding problems do to lack of detrussor function, I would definitely look into it some more, as opposed to just getting an rx and and seeing what happens.
Jim
tom2017 jimjames
Posted
You're right about being sure you don't have an obstruction. I had just had surgery for enlarged prostate. My urine path was NOT obstructed! That's how they discovered that in addition to the enlarged prostate, which I DID have I also had a bladder that wasn't working and I self cathed for awhile until my urologist prescribed bethanichol and as they say, "the rest is history."
Tom
dennis47445 tom2017
Posted
Interesting. I was taking bethanachol, and it didn't help at all. Goes to show you, we are all different.