Should I wait for Zeiss LARA in the US or get Symfony?
Posted , 28 users are following.
Should I wait for Zeiss LARA in the US or get Symfony?
LARA promises 0.5D more range and lesser night time issues with the SMP. Anyone has any ideas on this.
0 likes, 279 replies
soks
Posted
Is there even a single patient review available?
derek40125 soks
Posted
I'm really interested in the first reviews too as I'm hoping this will be out and well liked when it's time for my second eye. However, in general, patient reviews of IOL's seem to be very hard to find. We might need someone who comes on this (or a similar site) in advance of the surgery in order to actually write a review after they are done.
Do a search on "Restor 2.5D Review" and you'll see what I mean, you basically just find my posts, journals and paid studies. Yet, this is for an IOL that ranked just behind Symfony (23% to 22%) in terms of premium IOL's being implanted in the US (by surgeon preference in the 1/2018 Review of Ophthalmology).
There must be thousands of this IOL being implanted yet practically no patient reviews, just paid studies and journal articles plus a handful of complaints.
I think that Symfony, being a new design, has gotten more attention but I'm worried that we won't get nearly as much feedback about the next EDOF design unless it's people complaining about problems. I suspect that the main reason for the overall death of reviews is the average age of cataract patients puts them into the pre-internet era and they just don't think about reviewing something like an IOL unless they've encountered some serious issues.
soks derek40125
Posted
what is LARA doing? Giving more near vision? Giving sharper vision? Reducing the brightness of concentric circles? By how much?
soks
Posted
Sue.An soks
Posted
I do know some lenses we will never get for a variety of reasons.
soks
Posted
Everything they calim for LARA, Zeiss also has had for atLISA (SMP, better contrast etc.). Are there rings with LISA?
derek40125 soks
Posted
Soks, I have a multifocal IOL (Restor 2.5D), and the small halo I see around point sources of light is sometimes a single diffuse round ring and other times I can see 3 or 4 distinct, individual rings. They aren't always round, if a light source has a rectangular distribution, I can see multiple rectangular rings. However, the individual rings are spaced very close together and the overall diameter of the halo is pretty small.
The AT LISA is a tri-focal so you should be able to see two separate halos of different diameters with a gap in between, so you'd see the actual in-focus light source in the center, then a gap, then a halo, another gap, then the second halo.
Sue.An soks
Posted
I don’t think there is more contrast sensitivity with a trifocals as it is splitting light among 3 focal points. Also article states halos and glare worse with multifocal and trifocals vs EDOF lenses. There may not be rings but I think glare and starburst (think all night time issues lumped as halos in these articles) but they could be worse than rings. I remember early weeks with Symfony that I found that worse to deal with than the concentric rings.
Sue.An derek40125
Posted
soks derek40125
Posted
derek40125 Sue.An
Posted
The small halo (which often seems to be composed of individual rings) is the only night artifact I have. Although, I will note that the light source itself sometimes isn't perfectly defined either (a bit of a blob) and I think this is glare. It's mostly with LED and HID headlights and I see a very similar effect through my other eye too (the difference being the added halo from the out of focus near point).
derek40125 soks
Posted
I think "bifocal" would be closer but they don't use that term because people associate the term bifocal with the split focus glasses and the IOL's work nothing like that.
There are currently several multifocals with two focus points and a few designs with three focus points, "trifocal" (AT LISA). These would both be considered multifocals but I don't think that any tri-focal is available in the US at the moment. These IOL's create two or three distinct images on the retina and your brain sorts out the "correct" image. Under certain conditions, the overlapping out of focus images can create halos or other artifacts.
The EDOF designs, like Symfony work differently and do not create two separate images on the retina.
at201 soks
Posted
jantje32476 soks
Posted
Hi soks, it may be worthwhile to read the feedback from nancy528 who had Technis Symfony lens implant(s). Discussion bears the title "Complications from YAG capsulotomy?". Her Pb was not with Symfony's halo / starburts / rings around street lights. Rather with
her surgeon promptly carried out a YAG the very next day after her lens implantation.
nancy528 > veepee (2017-06)
The YAG was not done for the starbursts or halo effect. I do see starbursts around bright street lights but I kind of think they are cool! I know, that sounds weird but they don't bother me and may subside as my brain adjusts to them, at least that is,what I heard,
nancy528 > Susie91820 (2017-06)
Susie and Veepee,
what type of lens do you each have that caused such terrible halos?
i have Tecnis Symfony and do not have such an issue. I have not done my second eye yet but it is supposed to be a technis mult focal to give me more near vision correction.
soks
Posted
jantje32476 soks
Posted
"reichert com" (hqs in NY) (European Service Center in Munich Germany)
with distributors in: France, Germany, UK and other EU countries
supplier of: Ocular Response Analyzer® G3
Random example: Dr Damien Gatinel (Paris Fr) (gatinel com), mentions ORA, IOL Master, Zeiss in his papers, but does not state what machine(s) he leases.