SLT procedure next week for Glaucoma
Posted , 7 users are following.
Hi everyone, i have glaucoma with some blindness in my right eye, which appears to be getting worse. My eye pressures are about 22 left eye and 24 right eye. My consultant has suggested an SLT procedure as the first course of action. I agreed but since reading some horror stories about this procedure am scared witless. Could anyone tell me of their experiences please? Thanking you in anticipation
1 like, 17 replies
Dancer64 Mati1066
Posted
Mati1066 Dancer64
Posted
Dancer64 Mati1066
Posted
Mati1066 Dancer64
Posted
Alcantara Mati1066
Posted
I had it ages ago, my pressures were round about 28! They told me it would take about 1 1/2 hours, and that was worrying. But what actually hapenned was nowhere near as bad. They put drops in the eye, (completely painless) and then cleared off without a word leaving me in the waiting room. After about an hour, they came and took me to the laser room. Squirted some jelly in eye (painless). and then put something like a jeweller's eyeglass in eye with upper and lower lids over the edge of it, so I couldn't blink even if I wanted to. They then sat me in front of laser machine, and I could see the end of the laser gun quite clearly. They then said they would try one shot, to see how it felt. It was the very slightest stinging sensation, nowhere near painful. They asked if I was happy for them to continue, and I said yes. They then put 25 more laser shots in, over about 20 seconds, and then told me to sit back for about ten seconds. That was follwed by 25 more, and a rest, then another 25, and then the last 25 - 100 in total. They then pulled the contact lens out, and all I could see was a grey blur, (caused by the jelly). This began to clear within seconds, and sight was back to normal before a minute had gone by. They told me to go away, and come back in an hour. They didn't even cover the eye up. I wandered about feeling quite normal. When I returned, they checked the pressure, said it was OK, and let me go home. The procedure itself took less than 5 minutes. I always felt that they should have told me this, rather than saying it would take 1 1/2 hours and not mentioning the fact that most of that time was waiting from the drops to work!. Apparently, SLT does not damage the eye, or puncture it, like other procedures do. It must have been about 9 years ago now, and still have perfect sight in that eye. (I am 73). Maybe someone else will give their experiences with it!
Mati1066 Alcantara
Posted
Hi Alcantara, thank you very much for this step by step account of your experience. It has put my mind at rest. You read such horror stories and while I know there is no guarantee of this procedure working my consultant said there were no side effects. When you read some people's experiences it's enough to freak you out completely. So thank you very much for replying with that account of what exactly happens
iqbal_45667 Alcantara
Posted
Mati1066 iqbal_45667
Posted
iqbal_45667 Mati1066
Posted
lester90053 Mati1066
Posted
Mati1066 lester90053
Posted
Hi Lester, thank you for your comment, so is there any point to the procedure? I knew it wouldn't help me regain my lost sight but was told I wouldn't need medication afterwards. Is this incorrect?
Alcantara Mati1066
Posted
As Lester said, it is not permanent. I also had to carry on with drops after it. But one thing I did notice, the vision gradually improved considerably. It was always OK close-up, but a bit fuzzy at long distance without glasses. For years now, (since the SLT) it has been crystal clear at long distance without glasses, but I still need reading glasses for perfect focus. They assure me that it wasn't the SLT that caused the improvement of long-distance focus, but I am just grateful that it did. I suppose everyone is different, but as for the procedure itself, it is nothing to worry about! At my last visual fields test a few days ago, the field of vision in both eyes was excellent.
Mati1066 Alcantara
Posted
Thank you, it is most confusing as to why they have suggested the SLT as my consultant said after the procedure I wouldn't need drops, yet most of the things I have read indicate that is not the case. Thank you for reassuring me that the procedure isn t as horrendous as some people have indicated.
bevten Mati1066
Posted
When I left hosital after the first procedure my pressure had dropped to 14 from 22 pre op. Strangely, when I left after second procedure pressure was 26 up from 21 pre op.
Neither SLP procedures were successful, various drops have only reduced readings by 3 points, all with horrendous side effects. It will be interesting to see what hospital next suggests as my readings were 24/29 yesterday at my field test. I am fortunately past the extreme anxiety about all this (helped hugely by a mindfulness course).
Mati1066 bevten
Posted
Hi, thank you for putting my mind at rest about the SLT procedure. I am sorry it didn't work for you though. I wonder why with your second eye procedure your pressure was raised. I think mindfulness would probably do me good as I am dreadfully fearful about glaucoma. Good luck with your next hospital appointment.
bevten Mati1066
Posted
Good luck too.
Mindfulness does help deal with the immediate and helps put 'things behind doors' until needed, which in turn frees up more mind space/energy. (it did for me anyway).
I would suggest taking sunglasses when you go just in case you are sensitive to light too. The procedure does have a reasonable success rate, hopefully it will work for you X
Take care
hash bevten
Posted