Statin side effects BMJ
Posted , 5 users are following.
Brilliant letter by Dr Briffa http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3306/rr/698720
1 like, 6 replies
Posted , 5 users are following.
Brilliant letter by Dr Briffa http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3306/rr/698720
1 like, 6 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
duncanheenan sonya10
Posted
PaWiSu sonya10
Posted
sonya10 PaWiSu
Posted
I personally wouldn't go near a statin after suffering terrible side effects, also after lots of research I've come to realise we need cholesterol and the whole lowering cholesterol to prevent heart disease is a big fat lie.
fingers crossed you remain side effect free :-)
PaWiSu sonya10
Posted
Thanks for your response. I tend to agree about statins and cholesterol and I read many articles that question the hysteria about cholesterol. I tell my mother that, at 82, it's a bit late to worry about and not worth the siade effects. As I have type 2 diabetes and fatty liver I am heavily pressurised to take the statins but am keeping verything under review. I take part in experiments and trials for diabetes and, about to start a new one; becuase of this I had a complete medical examination and full blood profile by the researchers; I had been feeling really exhausted and the blood profile found my Haemoglobin level to be very low; as I had never had problems with this before I wonder if it is another side effect of restarting the statins; on referal to my GP I am now on iron sulphate to try to bring it back up. I have always tried to avoid any form of medications because I think you can get on a slippery slope of ever more tablets each one trying to treat side-effects from a previous one.
brian03294 sonya10
Posted
Personally I think statins will prove to be the biggest and most damaging medical scandal in history. Even bigger than the Vioxx scandal that killed over 60 000 people and cost Merck $4.85 billion in damages and an additional $950 million to end a US government investigation of the drug’s marketing practices plus an additional $23 million last year.
Big pharma influences are leaning on the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the researchers that published a damning report on statins to get it withdrawn. (possibly threatening to do a “Wakefield” type stitch up on them).
The trouble with the modern allopathic medical system is that it is more interested in turning off the smoke alarms than putting out the fires. (a pill to mask every ill, instead of prescribing a healthy diet and life style {not the currently suggested high carb / sugar and low fat one though} )
sonya10 brian03294
Posted