Surgical Consent
Posted , 5 users are following.
Afternoon all,
Has anyone else ever signed a surgical consent from prior to elective surgery to wakeup from the surgery to discover that the surgeon has "done something completly different". Not to save a life, stop excessive bleeding etc just because he "felt it was it was in best interest". No next of kin were consulted, in fact I was miles away from home at a specialist hospital on my own.
Longer hospital stay, longer recovery, bigger scar the list could go on.
If so, what actions did you take and what was the outcome?
Thank you
0 likes, 5 replies
craig84609 stephanie53613
Posted
nicola29615 stephanie53613
Posted
I have awoken from surgery to find what i had signed for hasnt been done
Pinoyboy stephanie53613
Posted
Marina_Dee stephanie53613
Posted
stephanie53613 Marina_Dee
Posted
Absolutely no mention for any alternatives,either in outpatients, anesthetist, ward staff. The same staff had even booked me in to the hospital hotel for the day after surgery as the consented op required a 24hr stay to enable another day to recover before travelling home Woke up to be told 'you are with us until tues' (7 days). I had packed for 24hr stay, I was on my own and remained so for 6 days. Apparently 'it was in my best interest' to me proves that it 'wasn't to save my life' 'prevent further damage' prevent further blood loss'. I thought I can't possibly be the only one this has happened to and was hoping for some real hard evidence/advice of what to do or outcome when hospitals don't answer but circumnavigate the all important question. Thank you.