Swollen foot...what should I do?
Posted , 3 users are following.
Greetings fellow sciatica sufferers I have had sciatica for the past 4 years since suffering a prolapsed disc at work. Since then I have had 2 further acute episodes, the last one 2 months ago. An MRI last November showed 2 prolapsed discs (L2/3 and L3/4) and 1 bulging (L4/5). I suspect that my latest episode may have been L4/5 prolapsing. I have had pain and weakness in my lower back and right leg to varying degrees since the beginning, but now also have a swollen foot, pins and needles and burning sensation. I have been to A&E and checked out ok for DVT, kidney problem or infection, and am on a waiting list to see the Orthopaedic team. I have used Naproxen and Cocodamol on and off for years (not necessarily to good effect), but they have now given me Lyrica. I'm loathe to start taking it due to possible side effects. To be honest the pain has subsided again to a manageable level, but the swelling and burning sensation worry me. I've been fit and active all my life (now 50) and until 4 years ago never needed to go to the doctor for anything. But in the last 4 years I've made several trips to the GP and A&E, and don't seem to be getting anywhere very fast! I would really welcome advice from anyone who has experienced similar symptoms...my main concern is whether I may now have permanent nerve damage.
0 likes, 15 replies
melissa91009 rachel61632
Posted
melissa91009
Posted
rachel61632 melissa91009
Posted
melissa91009 rachel61632
Posted
melissa91009
Posted
melissa91009
Posted
rachel61632 melissa91009
Posted
Lennie3 rachel61632
Posted
The only way to know for sure what is wrong is to get another MRI scan but the docs never seem too keen to offer it. Must be expensive but then so is paying sick benefit and a lifetime of pain relief drugs.
rachel61632 Lennie3
Posted
The burning sensation is weird, for me it's like having sunburn...but if I try and wear anything (like shoes!) that touches the upper side of my foot it feels as though I've been stung by a jellyfish! I think I have some numbness too...I can still feel stuff, but it feels as though it's a bit further away(?) but I'm not sure if it's the swelling that's causing that.
You're exactly right about the cost of long term sickness and drugs in comparison to sorting problems out. I suppose in part they weigh up the risks of surgery. Also, from the statistics I've found online, it seems as though some long term outcomes are not that different whether you have surgery or not? This makes me suspect that the holders of the purse strings may feel that spending on treatments is not a worthwhile investment, seen as a paper exercise...of course for the folk suffering from the symptoms it is a more pressing matter!
And long term use of painkillers brings its own health risks...I try and have periods off of the drugs to give my liver and kidneys a break...but you can only put up with so much...I birthed 3 children many years ago and I can safely say that this pain, when it gets hold of you, is as fierce as the most intense labour contraction but ultimately worse because of its unrelenting nature.
Well I wish you luck Lennie...I have had temporary relief from sessions with an Osteopath, and you can get an NHS referral for that (if you're in the UK)...but after 10 years I dare say you have tried a few things already!
Lennie3 rachel61632
Posted
rachel61632 Lennie3
Posted
melissa91009 rachel61632
Posted
rachel61632 melissa91009
Posted
After my experiences over the last couple of days I have decided to arrange healthcare in a neighbouring country, and see how that differs. This will take a while to arrange (and entail communication problems), but it doesn't seem as though the problem is going to go away any time soon so is probably worth doing.
I turned down the injections after looking at the evidence base and speaking to a couple of doctors. While research shows that they can help with pain more than half of the time, they can also cause iatrogenic problems such as decreasing bone density in menopausal women (me!), and as an invasive procedure obviously carry risk of infection etc. Personally I don't want to undergo any such invasive procedures unless they are going to at least try to fix the problem...and both my parents had osteoporosis in their later years, so I am already likely to have issues with bone density.
I think you're right Melissa, the next step should be more investigations...I have several new symptoms since the last one was done, but am being made to feel as though I am wasting their time. I find it laughable that much of the literature advises surgery to be considered if sciatica doesn't resolve within 6 weeks...4 years down the line I appear to be back at square one...it's like the film Groundhog Day! But I now realise that there are many folk out there (like yourself and Lennie) who have been given the same brush off for a lot longer than I have! It really is good to be in touch with other people who understand what you're going through
melissa91009 rachel61632
Posted
rachel61632 melissa91009
Posted