Symfony lens comparison to naked eye
Posted , 15 users are following.
As a brief background, I have a Symfony lens implanted in my right (dominant) eye and my God given eyeball on the left side. I'm trying to decide between having another Symfony lens implanted or a standard lens implanted in the other (left) eye, or go for a complete lens exchange. It has been 4-1/2 months since my first eye was worked on.
A couple of nights ago, I was in a theater watching an animated film (Ethel & Ernest, which was great). As I was watching the movie, I would occasionally alternately cover one eye and then the other, to see if I could notice any difference in what I was seeing from one eye to the other. I was very surprised to find out that my original eye produced noticeably richer colors and more detail than the Symfony eye. In fact, some of the fine black line work could be seen with my original eye, but wasn't there at all with the Symfony eye. I found this kind of disturbing. (Also, my original eye was seeing sharper than the Symfony eye). My question is: Is the loss of richness and color a by-product of the Symfony lens or could that be what my natural eye would be seeing even if I didn't have an implant? Also, if it is a by-product of the Symfony lens ... if I went for a lens exchange (to a standard lens), could I expect to see the richness and detail come back again (or is it lost forever)? Thank you.
0 likes, 64 replies
pg128 rpk0925
Posted
I think there are a couple of factors here, and as someone that went for monofocal IOLs for the best sharpness I can give the alternative thoughts on lens choice.
I think the richness of colors in your natural lens s most likely due to the yellowing of your natural lens with age. I work in color sensitive work and now I have IOls instead of my 50+ natural lenses colors as so much whiter but for some that may seem less rich (like cooler white bulbs vs warm color ones). I like the less colorful but more natural view I now have, but that's mostly because I know what it most realistic. For example many people buy overly saturated color TVs as they look so good even though the colors are false.
Symfony lenses cannot provide the level of sharpness that monofocal IOLs can, but then can give a good result over a wider focal range. This is one of the reasons I went with monofocals after years of various multifocal contacts where the compromise is obvious. However I still wonder if I made the right choice as I have great sharpness but only over a very narrow range. I often wear multifocal contact lenses over the top to solve this but then I am back to the same compromise, although I can choose day by day.
In summary there are no perfect IOLs and we choose our compromise. If you are otherwise happy with vision from your Symfony IOL then that's good enough and that's something I am not with my monofocals at the moment as they didn't hit target which is less critical with Symfony.
Sue.An pg128
Posted
I had no idea about impact of aging on colours- thank you for providing that insight.
susan44499 rpk0925
Posted
michael74313 susan44499
Posted
derek40125 susan44499
Posted
My other eye is still pretty good and colors look exactly the same between my two eyes so I think that is the most important thing.
vlad873 michael74313
Posted
vasily48550 rpk0925
Posted
This may also have something to do with watching the movie in a dark theater. In the darkness, the eye dilates and you get less depth of focus. The simulation of the USAF target image presented in paper "Laboratory evaluation of the optical properties of two extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses" shows that the quality of vision with Symfony IOL depends on the aperture and is the best when the aperture is smaller. However, this effect is the worst when defocus is 0.5-1.0D and is not substantial when defocus is 0, which is distance vision if the lens are set for distance. In either case, it is interesting if you can see a similar difference in the daylight.