Thoracic AA 7.3cms: Bristol Royal Infirmary

Posted , 4 users are following.

I have been diagnosed with a 7.3cms Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA). I am going into the Bristol Royal Infirmary (BRI) in the near future for CT scans and to discuss my options. I beleive they want to operate within three weeks.

What I know so far is that a non-invasive technique is out of the question because the neck of the ameurysm is too narrow to allow the collapsed stent to pass through. So it's open heart surgery.

The suggested consultant is Mr. Cha Rajakaruna. My minimal research so far does not put his medical outcome as high as some other surgeons but then it's hard to judge. Personal recommendation may be a better guide.

Has anyone had any experience of this surgeon?

Thanks for your time.

0 likes, 8 replies


8 Replies

  • Posted

    Hi I just wanted to say good luck and if you dont mind asking how old are you?. I had a completely different abdominal non related operation last year and i also researched my appointed surgeon and got all worried and confused about the surgeon i had been given and then a different one operated on the actual day! So do ask if he will actually do the op. Also for my op there were 2 surgeons in the op theatre doing the op, Im not sure if that is normal nhs practice , so there may be more than one surgeon in there when they operate. x
    Report Reply
    • Posted

      Hi Mim66,

      To answer your question, I'm 67 years old.

      I believe that for most complex, open operations there is more than one surgeon in the theatre, a multi-disciplne team in fact. One might be a specialist in one particlar aspect of the procedure, another in a different aspect. However the most important and tricky part of the operation I would expect to be performed by the lead surgeon who should have the most experience and appropriate skills for that task.

      I am asking about Mr. Cha Rajakaruna specifically because for me I need to understand, as far as my non-medical background will allow, as much as possible about my condition and the operation. To do this I need to develop a good rapport with the surgeon and be able to ask any question and know that he/she will take the time and make the effort to ensure that I understand to my satisfaction. Not all doctors like that. I nearly walked out on a consultant surgeon once because he really was not forthcoming and didn't want to answer the more difficult questions.

      Report Reply
  • Posted

    Hi I found this information about your surgeon- says 96% success rate sounds ok. See link

    Report Reply
    • Posted

      Thanks for that.

      I guess 96% is reassuring but it still means that of the 462 cases (2013 to 2016) 18 were unsuccesssful ... whatever unsuccesssful means!

      It's a sobering thought that with aortic aneurysms there is not much scope for getting it nearly right, either the repair works or you die!

      Report Reply
  • Posted

    No, but the non invasive technique sounds wonderful.  You should do very well
    Report Reply
    • Posted

      Hi Suzanne,

      Since I last posted I have had a further CT scan at the BRI and I now have an appointment with the consultant for the 28th September which seems to be a long time hence to me. Especially as I was given to believe that I’d be operated on quite quickly.

      Yes, the non-invasive technique does seem like best approach, however … I have been told that the “neck of the aneurysm” is too narrow to let the collapsed stent through and so this technique is not an option.

      Frankly I either don’t understand that or I don’t believe that.

      If the rest of the aorta, the healthy bit, is of nominal size then the collapsed stent should be able to get through to the enlarged bit i.e. the aneurysm. If it’s collapsed surely the stent should be smaller in diameter than a normal aorta otherwise no one would be able to have a stent fitted! … what would be the point of a producing a stent that couldn’t travel up a nominally sized aorta!

      The only interpretation I can put on this is that my aorta narrows as it approaches the aneurysm which seems unlikely to me.

      The other thing that occurs to me is that the aneurysm is in the region of the ascending aorta as it comes out from the aortic valve rather than below the descending aorta. I can see that potentially might be a more complex procedure since there are three major arteries branching out to other parts of the body at that point.

      I guess these are is just some of the many questions I need to ask the consultant. My main worry is, just how urgent is the situation? I have seen it stated that if the aorta is over 6cms then it’s time to consider a repair. Well mine is 7.3cms but they don’t seem in too much of a hurry to get me on the slab.

      Meanwhile my partner is following me around expecting me to drop at any minute … I’m exaggerating but it would freak me out if I were to take her seriously. She’s just understandably concerned, bless her.

      Anyway, thanks for your interest Suzanne.

      Regards, Phil.

      Report Reply
    • Posted

      Hi Dan,

      Yes I have had surgery since last I posted to this thread.

      To cut a long story short; since the BRI seemed so slow at responding, given I was told this was quite an acute situation, I did a bit of research into the best hospitals/surgeons in the UK to deal with Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (i.e. TAA and not AAA) and found the BRI did not seem to be amongst them. The ones I came up with are The Royal Brompton, Papworth and the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (LHCH).

      Well I’ve been to the Brompton before in 1995 to have the remains of a cancerous tumour removed from between my lungs but the Quality Care Commission (CQC) gives them a rating of “Requires Improvement” so I ruled them out. The LHCH however have a rating of “Outstanding” with the CQC and they also have a team that specialises in TAAs.

      I suppose I should mention at this stage that it is part of the NHS constitution that one has the right to choose where and by whom one is treated, so I did. I asked my GP to refer me to the lead surgeon for TAAs at the LHCH which is Mr. Mark Field.

      Mr Field was very quick off the mark and after a consultation said we should operate as soon as we could and certainly before Christmas 2018. He also said that I didn’t have a thoracic aortic aneurysm per se but I did in fact have a pseudo thoracic aortic aneurysm. This turns out to be where the aneurysm has already burst but by some mechanism the rupture is contained by surrounding tissue, in this case the scar tissue from the cancerous tumour that they removed in 1995. So, I’m one of the few people who can say that cancer saved my life!

      Mr Field operated on me on the 5th of November 2018. I had my aortic root completely replaced with a Dacron tube and an integral mechanical aortic valve and a portion of my hemi-arch was replaced with a Dacron tube as well. It was very major surgery and I was in the operating theatre for just over 12 hours.

      I am now well on my way to full recovery and about to start cardiac-rehab. Mr Field tells me that I won’t feel like the old “me” again until the spring, so maybe March/April will see me returning to a full active life……. I’m not saying there have not been any challenges along the way and I’m sure there will be a few more yet but I’m still here and kicking!!!



      Report Reply

Join this discussion or start a new one?

New discussion Reply

Report as inappropriate

Thanks for your help!

We want the forums to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the forums are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the forums is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.

newnav-down newnav-up