Tulsa Procedure and FLA for BPH
Posted , 9 users are following.
Hello everyone,
Haven't been around for a bit taking care of non prostate health issues and just read something about the Tulsa Procedure. Sounds a little like the FLA procedure Dr's Sperling and Karamanian were doing and in fact, I think the Sperling Center is going to be offering Tulsa soon, so maybe the same thing?
Anyone here have it yet? How does it differ or not differ from Dr. K's procedure? Is it covered by insurance?
Also, has Dr. K. finally published his study data? Any longer term reports here on how well FLA patients are doing? And lastly, anything else new and interesting treatment/procedure wise in the last year or so?
For those that remember me, I've been treating my bph with self catherization (CIC) for some time now. Still am. I started with almost complete retention holding over a liter of urine to CIC six times a day. Over the course of time my bladder started rehabbing to the point where I was able to stop CIC altogether with a normal PVR. Today, I cath anywhere from zero to six times a day depending on a number of variables. My PVR with normal voids is usually under 100ml which is about what you can expect from a surgery. Still happy with it but always thinking ahead so I came across the TULSA.
Thanks for any help.
PS signing into the site is now harder than getting into Fort Knox. Wish my bank
had such security lol What's with that lol
Jim
1 like, 34 replies
uncklefester jimjames
Edited
**Application for Fexapotide Triflutate Rejected by FDA **
Due to censors on this forum you'll need to google this to get the details
jimjames uncklefester
Posted
Thanks. Disappointing news. Hopefully they will come back with another application soon.
Jim
tonyd64 jimjames
Posted
Hey Jim -
Just registered to the board, but found it and read it thoroughly when I first had a traumatic event in Oct 2020. I am 64 and in otherwise good health, but suffered BPH for many years. Took Flomax for years never sure it did any good.
Finally had my PCP send me to his Urologist for a checkup. Went to pee before entering the office, and when I got there they asked for a urine sample... duoh. So I squeezed out what I could, then went in and the nurse did a bladder scan. I think she said s**t or Jeezus, and her eyes lit up. I said what's the matter, and she said your bladder is at 99% capacity.
The doc came in, and immediately said we have to catheter you.... he took out 2.5 liters.
After this traumatic event, and learning I was now entering the world of CIC, I found this site and took comfort in the many helpful posts, including yours.
I am now an old pro at CIC. I stumbled upon Cure Ultra M14C 14FR pre-lubed catheters, and couldn't be happier with them.
I lost about 8 pounds (of mostly urine), now have a flat belly, sleep through the night, no incontinence, never have to run to the bathroom, sex life is good... CIC has been all positive.
BUT - I keep wondering if I want to do this the rest of my life, or try a surgery/procedure at some point. Just don't know what to do. The Urologist is pushing a bi-polar TURP, and says he does them all the time with great results. But then I read some of the war stories here, and don't want to deal with all the potential side effects and issues... so hard to decide what if anything to do.
The doc says that based on my large median lobe, I would not be eligible for other treatments.
Now that I am registered on this board, would like to more actively post and learn more.
Your comments always welcome.
jimjames
Edited
Your story is a lot like mine except 8 years ago. CIC turned my life around without any of the risks associated with procedures and surgeries. After awhile it became as routine and painless as brushing my teeth.
Like yourself, I also have explored other options. For awhile I took Daily Cialis which helped reduce my cath frequency some, but then I started getting side effects from it so stopped.
I also at one time was able to rehab my bladder enough to the point where I stopped CIC for months. Now, I cath sometimes and sometimes don't. Depends on the volume in my bladder.
I have looked at all the options. So far nothing has jumped out at me. I think it all comes down to what you're looking for. If you're just looking for an alternative to CIC there are any number of procedures including the TURP you mention.
For me, preserving my ejaculation is a deal breaker, at least for now. So that doesn't leave too many options unless you want to roll the dice. Some procedures have more of an incidence of retro than others, but they all seem to have at least 10%. I think the TURP you are talking about has about 100% retro. Not for me, now.
I started this thread because I heard about Tulsa. But from what I understand, Tulsa also has a high incidence of retro. Another procedure mentioned here is FLA.
It's only done by a few doctors and the results are mixed. Durability is a question. Data is relatively sparse. Retro seems to be about 10% which is similar to Rezum.
Your criteria may be different. Many men don't care about retro at all. If that's the case, you should take your time and look into all the options.
You say your doc said your large median lobe limits you to just one procedure. Not sure if that is true or not. I believe HOLEP works for larger median lobes and maybe some of the other less invasive procedures as well, but not sure.
Like I said, I'm like you except 8 years ago. And like yourself, open to options other than CIC where I will be less dependent on a catheter but so far haven't found anything that calls to me.
But who knows. Maybe something new will come along that better meets my criteria. Or maybe, as my age advances, I will start to lose the dexterity required for CIC. If that started to happen, I would re-evaluate my criteria, go for one of the current procedures and swap being more independent for a chance of retro.
Can't tell you what to do. I would like to say you're relatively young and something really great should coming down the pike in the next 5-10 years. But that's what I thought 8 years ago and still haven't seen it. But I have my criteria and perhaps a bit picky. Meanwhile it's CIC which has served me well to this point.
Jim
tonyd64 jimjames
Edited
Thanks Jim. Your thoughts reflect what I feel right now.
One thing that spurred my interest in considering other options was the cost of my catheters.
I am still working, and my company used to offer an HMO. I paid nothing for my catheters for a year and a half. Then they got rid of the HMO option starting in 2022, and under PPO, the catheters are costing me about $3,500 a year due to deductibles. Ouch.
I turn 65 in October, but since I am still working I am using private insurance. What do catheters cost under Medicare with a BCBS supplemental policy?
Anyway, I think you and others mentioned "Sperling" a few times.
I did find this doc, so he must be who you are talking about. I am intrigued by this FLA procedure, and he even mentions having a large median lobe as an issue that this treatment specializes in. He also goes in through the rectum, not urethra (if I'm not mistaken).
I'm in Chicago, but would be open to flying to NJ or FL to do this if my insurance would cover. Or maybe there are docs in Chicago that perform this same procedure. Thoughts on this?
jimjames tonyd64
Posted
Conventional medicare with a supplemental pays 100% for up to 200 catheters a month. Alternatively, you could try a non-hydrophilic and re-use them. For example, some can get by with just one or two red rubber catheters a week, washed and dried between uses.
Sperling is one of the few docs that do FLA but the doc that most used here is Dr. Ara Karamanian out of Texas. Results seem mixed with durability a question and about 10% retro. That said, some here have had a very good experience. Maybe you can look over the old posts and track some of his patients down. My understanding is that FLA will not be covered by insurance and is at least 20K.
Jim
tonyd64 jimjames
Posted
Thanks Jim.
keith42667 jimjames
Edited
Hello y'all. I've also been infrequently visiting this site. Glad to see there is still some support here and great to see Jim.
I'm still doing catheters. Probably use 3 - 5 per day. I've been blessed by not having much trouble with UTIs. I think part of it is that I have used the drop in method for a long time now. I hang the catheter on my cabinet over the toilet, use my left hand to raise penis to correct position and widen the opening a little and insert the end of the catheter. I have to be careful to lower penis all the way hanging before pusing catheter all the way in. I have gotten some blood by not doing this carefully. Thankfully, my urethra has so far always recovered. I still like the fact that I am completely voiding.
I haven't done a log for awhile. I know I should drink more water and less black coffee but I'm not having any real problems. No doubt that my bladder now has more feeling and I am definitely using that feeling of needing to pee more than watching the clock as I had to do in the beginning. The only thing that kind of worries me is that at this point, I can't get out a drop before cathing. A couple of years ago I could usually get out just a small amount first. This could be because I am regularly totally emptying so when I get urgent calls to pee, there really isn't all that much in my bladder. Sometimes my urgent feelings still go away for a time but usually come back. Sometimes there's close to 500 ml I think but haven't actually measured. More often is probably around 300 to 350 ml.
I've been doing this for around 5 years I think. The Urologist I was seeing has recently retired. My PSA numbers are too high but they aren't increasing and my general MD doesn't seem worried about it but is keeping an eye on me. Actually, he is my doctor's former PA who I guess is now a doctor. Anyway, he's the one that gave me my annual medicare exam.
hank1953 keith42667
Posted
Hi Keith, what type of catheters are you using? Hank
keith42667 hank1953
Posted
Hey Hank. Yes, I'm still here.
I've settled on Cure hydrophilic. The size F12 seems to work for me better. The package has the little sticky thing on the back so I can take off the paper and stick it to the wall so as to use my right hand to get it & insert it.
It has a water packet that has to be broken and a sheeth that one uses to handle the catheter. They were less expensive than the other brand I was using. Even though I'm on medicare I'm aware of costs; but these just work better for me.
hank1953 keith42667
Posted
Hey Keith ! I am using cheap plain Cure catheter with separate liquid lube, but I am familiar with the hydrophilic version. How much is your copay with Medicare? Hank
keith42667 hank1953
Posted
The reorder number on it is HM14. I'm using a 14FR. I was remembering 12 but no they are 14. I'm not sure what my copay is but its covered by my medigap insurance. I know that they cost less than the speedicath; significantly less and I like them better. No quite so stiff.
hank1953 keith42667
Posted
The Speedicath gave me so much problems in my earlier years because they are too stiff. Size 14 Cure is more like it because you employ the dive bomb technique. Size 12 would be a challenge for soft catheters like Cure, even though I use size 12 at times. Hank
keith42667 hank1953
Posted
Exactly. I was able to go up to a 14 because they aren't as stiff. I remember one of the old posters (I think it was Cartoon Man) who made fun of someone because they said they used a larger one because it took less time. But that was one of my motivations. I'm glad that I tried a few different ones because I think this one works well for me and it's less money requested from Medicare. Cure also states that they use no natural rubber ( which I gather is bad) and there is some thing they say it is free of. Also "polished eyelets". I like this because the speedicath would often pull on my bladder. I don't notice it so much with the Cure one I'm using.
I didn't intend to use catheters for this long. I think it's been around 5 years. I remember reading JimJames and he was about 3 years along when I started reading him. He said that he was doing this "on/off" method where he would try to go for hours without cathing. At three years I was not able to go very long and I can't get much out even today. In fact, I think my retention without cathing is worse than ever. I've tried 5M. of Cialis more than once and I didn't like the side effects, but mostly I was feeling like I had to pee all day. I don't think I was producing any more urine than before I was taking the tadafil but I just felt the need all the time. Very unpleasant. Hve you ever had this effect or have you tried drugs at all?
hank1953 keith42667
Edited
I tried Cialis before but stopped after few days because it didn't help the urination, only the erection. It did not give me any side effects.
I still have some natural void, but I might have some help from Doxazosin, which is an alpha blocker. I didn't stop it after starting cathing because I also use it to lower blood pressure. Hank