Posted , 8 users are following.
I subscribe to a service called Practice Update by Elsevier. They just reported the following quote of part of the article.
Investigators found similar reductions in the IPSS among men undergoing aquablation and TURP in the overall sample; however, among men with prostate volume greater than 50 g, improvement associated with aquablation exceeded that of TURP. Interestingly, the risk of anejaculation was much lower among men undergoing aquablation than TURP (2% vs 41%).
Anejaculation means no ejaculation.
0 likes, 9 replies