TUVP experience and question
Posted , 9 users are following.
First I'm a 67 year old that has has an enlarged prostate for many years. Started taking Flo-max 4 years ago but lately it's not working.
I'll skip ahead and say it's been 16 days since my TUVP surgery and not doing well at all. I was sent home 4 hours after surgery with a cath that never felt good. Went back to ER 8 hours later when it stopped up from blood clots and had it flushed out. My biggest problem now is the burning and bladder spasms. When I say bad I mean passing out bad. I try to pee but the pain gets so intense I have to get up and the flow stops. This goes on 4 or 5 times an hour till my bladder is partially empty.
Went back to ER today and they found I now have a bacterial infection. They gave my Phenazopyridine for the burning, Cephalexin for the infection and Tramadol for the pain.
Anybody else have problems like this? Is it normal or should I find a new doc?
0 likes, 18 replies
emil54651 joe5749
Posted
joe5749 emil54651
Posted
kenneth1955 joe5749
Posted
kenneth1955
Posted
Joe I forgot to ask. Did your doctor offer you any other procedure or is TUVP and TURP the only ones he does. My urologist call's the TURP procedure the last resort.....Ken
joe5749 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth - Since we only have 1 urologist within 100 miles and he said he only does TURP or TUVP's I didn't have much choice. He said the TUVP has less blood clots and faster recovery time sothat's what he offered me . . .
kenneth1955 joe5749
Posted
Joe I would have went some were else. The other direction. Not to have one of them procedure. I feel sorry that you were so limited. You most likely did not need the last resort procedure. I hope you get better because if you don't your going to need another doctor. Because your is out of date. Ken
Supertractorman joe5749
Posted
Don't know of TUVP, but had TURP 2 years ago, and still have E/D and Incontinence although that is a lot better now. The other problem is they now want to do another as it has all grown back so back to square one. The only thing I will agree to now is total removal as TURP is waste of time, and apparently your Prostate grows no matter your age, just wish some other things would grow !.
j12080 joe5749
Posted
FLA is done by an Interventional Radiologist, Uros are not trained and skilled in this solution and the Urologist want to try to keep in quite. It is FDA approved but insurance companies will not pay for it so it is costly to the patient. But all i wanted was the results. This procedure was developed out of a cancer treatment that when done, they notice a dramatic improvement in BPH. It is a good solution. I was the first last year on December 19th as far as I can tell. It has been a year and I spoke last night with Mike Skier as he was the second or third guy. His results were also very good. We have about 20 men now that have had this done. The long term jury is out but it is very logical why it will continue. One clinical trial is being done currently and that helps some with the cost.
I am sorry about your pain but it should also improve and get better for you. I only hope that I can reach others so they will know about their options as Kenneth said they are several to consider. But there are many reasons I feel FLA is by far the best. Mainly no sexual side effects and very focused controlled tissue removal. We all should have a choice.
Good Luck Joe it will improve it just takes time.
emil54651 j12080
Posted
some insurance carriers pay for FLA. I had it approved, but chose to get treated by an urologist who did an excellent job. He warned me of potential side effects, namely retrograde ejaculation. The result is forward ejaculation, much better than before. Urination is good and literally no pain. Now, will it last? God knows, but then nothing is ever granted neither. I believe every person is different and every specialist has a different hand. Besides that, I think there is a lot of good luck and good chance which help in the outcome.
joe5749 j12080
Posted
j12080 emil54651
Posted
j12080 joe5749
Posted
FLA is done by an Interventional Radiologist, Uros are not trained and skilled in this solution and the Urologist want to try to keep in quite. It is FDA approved but insurance companies will not pay for it so it is costly to the patient. But all i wanted was the results. This procedure was developed out of a cancer treatment that when done, they notice a dramatic improvement in BPH. It is a good solution. I was the first last year on December 19th as far as I can tell. It has been a year and I spoke last night with Mike Skier as he was the second or third guy. His results were also very good. We have about 20 men now that have had this done. The long term jury is out but it is very logical why it will continue. One clinical trial is being done currently and that helps some with the cost.
I am sorry about your pain but it should also improve and get better for you. I only hope that I can reach others so they will know about their options as Kenneth said they are several to consider. But there are many reasons I feel FLA is by far the best. Mainly no sexual side effects and very focused controlled tissue removal. We all should have a choice.
Good Luck Joe it will improve it just takes time.
Bayliner joe5749
Posted
emil54651 Bayliner
Posted
joe5749 Bayliner
Posted
Hi Bayliner - yep, doing all that and because of the meds and blood clots all I do now is walk and sleep. I'm sure it will get better just a matter of time and care . . .