UK/US Vit D Facts
Posted , 8 users are following.
Our Australian friend made these new comments on Vit D3.
The US uses a different measurement scale.
In the US the measure is ng/ml ie nanograms per millilitre.
In the UK and most other countries is nmol/Litre.
The reason for the difference is that nmol/Litre is a "proper" chemical measure for labs in that it takes into account the molecular weight the molecule "25 hydroxy vitaminD"
As pointed out the conversion factor is approx 2.5
So 50nmol/L = 20ng/ml
AS you say UK and many other countries deem 50nmol/L to be sufficient. They do this for two reasons:
1. the "statistical normal level" of serum vitaminD is around 50nmol/L
2. the IOM (US:institute of medicine) says it is 20ng/ml (50nmol/L)
Is this right or is it wrong? what is an "optimal" level for health and disease prevention.
We know that Africans who are without upper body clothing average out at about 45ng/ml (112nmol/L)
We know that there are no known adverse events up to dosage of 20,000iu
We know that 5000iu daily pushes most peoples levels up to about 40ng/ml (100nmol/L)
We know that to get that from sun exposure would require around 20mins full body exposure in summer sun daily. Or around 30mins of upper body exposure daily.
These figures tell us that the average person gets no where near this sort of dosage (from the sun). Should they? History says that people get less sun exposure because of three things:
occupation
cold
fear (of getting cancer or wrinkled skin)
So we can assume that the "statistically normal" person is getting too little vitamin D from the sun. So the IOM is wrong, UK is wrong.
In addtion when a "normal" survey is done measuring people's vitamin D level it will include some people with disease that is not disclosed or even diagnosed. This will lower the average for the following resons:
We know that when a person has an infection or an inflammatory disease or cancer their levels decrease. No one knows why but it could be that it is being converted to the active form far faster to help deal with the disease. We do not measure the active form, we measure the precursor floating around in the blood.
So if you have an inflammatory based illness then the IOM 's figure does not apply at all.
Both the Endocrinological Society and the Vitamin D council recommend 4000iu to 5000iu respectively.
Again to get this sort of dosage from the sun just ain't gonna happen in the average person. So supplementation is advisable for EVERYONE and definitely for the sick.
3 likes, 30 replies
hanny32508 joy47826
Posted
TedHutchinson joy47826
Posted
The point we all should be aware of is that below 100nmol/l the amounts of vitamin D3 in tissue cells is not measurable only when 215(OH)D get above 100nmol/l are measurable and at 50ng/ml 125nmol/l they are significant in nearly everyone.
Not surprisingly we find that Vitamin D3 is best able to resolve inflammation when 25(OH)D is 50ng/ml 125nmol/l or above.
We should also point out that the process of conversion of vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol) > CALCIDIOL(circulating form) >CALCITRIOL(active hormonal form) requires the presence of magnesium. Most people don't get the RDA for magnesium and that, like the RDA for Vitamin D is set too low. The omage 3 DHA also helps resolve inflammation so making sure you are getting sufficient Vitamin d (35 iu per pound weight) adequate magnesium and OMEGA 3 DHA should help any condition involving chronic inflammation.
The graph below plots Vitamin D3 in tissue at different 25(OH)D levels. as Joy has said x by 2.5 to change ng/ml to nmol/l
joy47826 TedHutchinson
Posted
joy47826
Posted
My homocysteine has been going up in recent years and I know NOW it's because I slacked off on Omega 3's....so I'm faithful for the last year.... And will continue to be faithful....
My integrative MD believes homeocysteine is more critical than the cholesterol scare (myth)..... for heart health....plus a good book The Heart Revolution was an eye opener on this.
suzanne00 joy47826
Posted
denise76179 joy47826
Posted
joy47826 suzanne00
Posted
You've got that great NW salmon, I buy it when it's affordable and only wild. I'm due, maybe I'll go get some today at my market.
joy47826 denise76179
Posted
denise76179 joy47826
Posted
TedHutchinson suzanne00
Posted
Oral Vitamin B12 supplementation has been proved as if not better than using injections.
The most effective form of Vitamin B12 is a combination of the two active co-enzyme forms, methylcobalamin and adenosylcobalamin.