UROLIFT COST ???

Posted , 13 users are following.

I am 58 and have been on Tamsulosin and Finasteride for a year with all negative side effects, during last month. I declined TURP last week and The good new is I'm now candidate for Urolift.....but..... from my pocket.

Does any body know de procedure COST for 2 or 4 implants ?

WHERE IN USA ?

Thanks a lot for yours answers.

0 likes, 85 replies

85 Replies

Prev Next
  • Posted

    Has anyone heard of 3D Prostatitis Treatment? It is done only in China. (That scares me). But sometimes unconventional treatments (by European/ Western standards) such as acupuncture have proven over time to have merit. I can not put the website address on or it will get edited but if you search "3D Prostatitis Treatment" it will bring it up. The procedure is performed by two physicians. One is Dr. Song. I don't recall the other.
    • Posted

      Just read the artical on it.  It is very interestiing but I don't thik it will ever come to the US.  Unless Dr Song give permission.  It take around 30 days of the needles into the prostate.  They should be able to do that here. Who knows in time  Ken 
    • Posted

      Well, if I could get confirmation from people who have actually had the procedure (other than just the testimonials on their website) I would consider going to China. According to their website, a lot of their customers travel to China for this treatment. However, you would think if it was legitimate that we would all know about it by now. But like I said, if I could get confirmation that it really worked, I'd be checking airline ticket prices.
    • Posted

      Hi ES,

      It seems very interesting. Let me check it. I never has ear about 3d Prostatitis Treatment. 

      Take Care

      Thank you very mutch for your info.

      Vic

    • Posted

      Yes I know.  It did not say anything about any patient.  Take care  Ken
    • Posted

      Go to the testimonials (I'm still reading through them). Some are quite amazing. Especially page 2. They are from men from several different countries, many are from men from the US.
  • Posted

    My urologist suggested Urolift after two surgeries to take out bladder stones.  I was assured by him, and by their practice's finance department that my Blue Cross, Medicare, and Supplemental Mutual of Omaha would cover it.  Turns out that none of them did.  I got a bill for $18,000.00 for the surgery.  Of course I can't pay so they have the special Urolift lawyers appealing.  No word on how that went.  Feel sandbagged.  So be certain your insurance coverage will cover it up front.

    Love the results, though slow.  Had six thingies put in...they have to pull out and reload each time then go back in so lots of blood for a few days but no biggie to this Marine.  Never took any of the pain meds.  Big thing was more time to sleep at night...was up every hour or less before...began getting two, then three hours of sleep after a few weeks of healing.  Now, nine month later I have gotten as much as 6 1/2 hours of continuous sleep and commonly get over four hours and its getting better.  Worth it for certain if you have the financial part covered.  I'm in Arizona USA.  Was on Floxmax and with it gone had to add to my BP meds a bit.  Great joy is ejaculations like a teenager again.

    • Posted

      Maybe it is diffent in other city.  I'm in florida and I have wellcare.  All I paid was $200 for the surgery center.  Take care and enjoy  Ken 
    • Posted

      Hi River,

      A great line, your last one. Thanks for comment. Vic

       

    • Posted

      I waited for my Urolift until all regions of Social Security had agreed to cover the procedure.  BC/BS may be in the process of covering Urolift.  Stick with pushing them to cover it; it's NOT "experimental!"
  • Posted

    Vic, I have a long history with tamsulosin (Flomax). I started Flomax around 2005+\-2 years. I requested it from my primary as I was almost completely obstructed despite normal psa readings.  Flomax worked within hours of taking the first dose and I was hooked. It made my gerd worse, gave me retro, and interfered with my ability to run to my VO2max. That last symptom bothered me the most. And to top all else off the stuff made me dizzy at times. But I remained on it as it allowed me to pee for many years. Then about 6 months ago I experienced almost complete obstruction despite Flomax after Mt. Biking, then again after running, and then again after sex. I asked my primary about UroLift (UL) and he poopooed it but I found a urologist in Asheville NC where I live that he knew, they talked, and I was home free until the pre screen tests revealed a small 3rd lobe. I told my urologist I was aware that a Urologist in Australia was pinning the 3rd lobe out of the way and having great success so why could he not do that? My urologist's response was negative. He did tell me I had a 75% chance of success with UL. Also I learned that although he had received training in UL he had yet to install UL in a single patient by himself. So I took a leap of faith and told him I will be his first patient but he has to deal with my 3rd lobe and he did. He brought in a UL rep, an experienced UL physician and together they installed the device in me in 20 minutes. No cath was installed on my release. I had no pain at any time post op. Day 2, I was able to pee with effort a little weak stream but on day 3 post op only dribbles. That worried me as it was now the week end. I did not want to go to the ER to be cathed.  I began to pee in a measuring cup each voiding effort which were coming every 5-15 minutes intensely.  I learned that my frequent dribbles were totaling up to 200 ml per hour which was sufficient as I learned by talking on the phone to my primary. By the end of day 3 post op I had a weak but sustained stream and by the end of week 1 I stopped Flomax and have not taken the medication sense. At 10 days post op I had sex and ejaculation was associated with a brief sharp pain but otherwise normal. Thereafter that pain went away. No problems with erections as that never was an issue with me. As noted in a previous post by me on this thread, today my urine stream is incredible and I enjoy complete and forceful bladder evacuation, something I never thought I would ever e perience again. Moreover my swollen, but otherwise normal healthy prostate remains totally intact. I know that the prostate might grow more over the years and It may at some point begin to obstruct. My options should that occur are to undergo an additional UL implant installed, and if that fails I would then consider PAE. I have been told that I could get a PAE without removing the UL implant. But that is the future and now is now and I am an extremely satisfied customer.
    • Posted

      Hi Bill,

      Thanks a lot again. Another light for me.

      Hope you will be fine as well as today. Vic

  • Posted

    Vic,

     I haven’t heard of any negative sexual side effect from PAE.

    For most sex is improved.

    In my case I was able to stop the drugs which was a big improvement.

    I had this procedure done in January an now I feel I am completely cured without any negative effects. I am very surprised how well this worked.

    Again, read over others experiences with this procedure in the PAE forum.

    I had the PAE at the Vascular Institute of Virginia by Dr. Sandeep Bagla.

    • Posted

      Hi John,

      Thanks for comment. If I can confident with you, PAE scares me. Talking about arteries !!! ...but beeing seruios, the recover period for PAE it is not practical for my as well as the possible negative consequences. I have to travel and prevent any bad result ...for any procedure. Thanks John, appreciate your comments.

  • Posted

    Anybody else wonder why we always read the same exact phrase 'Turp is the gold standard...'   in articles and research papers?  Its not a very clinical term, more like a sales pitch.

    Gold standard seems to imply that the discussion is over.  The winner has been selected.  That everyone loves it.   

    Anybody else feel like we're being sold TURP?

     

    • Posted

      AMEN, brother, AMEN!  I would ask, "Is there anyone out there who was NOT told that TURP is the GOld Standard?!!!!!"    

      And another question:  was ANYONE out there, upon learning the nature of their problem from their urologist, told, "Well, TURP is the most common procedure, but there are other options.  Let me tell you about them, and why you might want to consider them over the TURP...."  ????    

      I sure wasn't... I refused the TURP, went off hunting, and by the time I had found the Urolift a year later, and had scheduled (with another urologist), my guy had also learned about Urolift, and was studying how to do it...

    • Posted

      I saw a poster on the wall of my urologist's office explaining the TURP and saying that it was "the gold standard ". The poster was supplied by the company that sells the device needed to do the TURP. What a coincidence! That's where the phrase comes from. Don't forget that urologists make money from the TURP, and probably from the company selling the equipment (sponsored trips to conferences on the TURP etc. ). Remember that no urologist makes money on the PAE because they don't do them. The PAE is done by an interventional radiologist., and most urologists haven't even heard about the Urolift, much less been trained in doing it.
    • Posted

      Hi Guys,

      Cartoon, Jjjj and Neal.

      In the middle of my BPH pain, you makes me drop a big laugh.

      Hope this smile is one of the bests part of surgery choise !!!

      Thanks a lot.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.