Use Of a Catheter To Stretch Urethra In BPH
Posted , 13 users are following.
I am 65 with a minor to moderate case of BPH. Urinating is difficult at times but not impossible (yet). I discovered somewhat by accident that using a larger diameter catheter greatly helps in relieving my symptoms for a day or two. It seems to "stretch" me or something. Is this an advisable thing to do or is it actually a bad idea? Anybody have any thoughts on this?
1 like, 15 replies
barrie62598 fred43679
Posted
Interesting idea. My BPH was treated with medications for 9 years concluding in disaster. Following my radical prostatectomy a blockage resulted in several months of self-catheterising. During this time I was told I should expect to need to continue this practice for life as apparently most with bladder neck or urethra stricters have to. Like everything to do with prostates there are side effects and other issues to consider. In Australia it seems we are over a decade behind with BPH treatment. My many contacts since my PCa have only ever heard of medication or TURP. It seems everybody else is way past that in options. You may want to check them all out but your idea seems OK if that's the way you want to go. Keep us informed. Barrie
hank1953 fred43679
Posted
Fred, I have been catherizating for over a year now and I also noticed that "stretching" effect after using larger size, but it's not as much as you called it "great". Some people on this forum used catheters as dialators for their strictures. I think you can go as high as you are comfortable with, without irritation or bleeding. Hank
pluff_mud fred43679
Posted
I use 18 Fr latex and 16 Fr plastic catheters. These are considered fairly large by folks in the forum. I don't notice any benefit from the stretching that you experience. I have been self cathing for over 4 months, and I have not had a natural void since I started. Prior to that, I was retaining over a liter and a half of urine in my bladder with small natural voids.
jimjames fred43679
Posted
Hi Fred,
Prior to using a larger diameter catheter, what FR size were you using and how often? Then what size did you move up to? You should empty the same regardless of catheter size, so I assume the "symptons" you are talking about are something else?
Jim
keith42667 fred43679
Posted
I've wondered about this sort of in passing. Sometimes when inserting one could get the notion that the passage may be easier to navigate; but then I'll do it the next time and it will be different. You're saying that if you use a larger size just one time it releives symptoms? If I could pee normally for three days by using a FR16 one time I do it for sure.
brian34488 fred43679
Posted
jimjames brian34488
Posted
@Brian: why bother with a life of catheters and the more one pushes to pee the more one destroys the bladder and in turn the kidneys
-------------------------------------
It's the opposite. Self catherization (CIC) makes "pushing" unnecessary plus empties the bladder completely therefore protecting and potentially even healing both bladder and kidneys.
I'm happy you have chosen FLA but keep in mind that it's an experimental procedure with no published trial data and less than ten anecdotal accounts here with what I would term mixed results plus it is generally not covered by insurance and therefore could be 20-30K out of pocket. Personally, I think the procedure is promising but folks here, especially the new ones, should get both sides of the picture.
Jim
hank1953 brian34488
Posted
Supertractorman fred43679
Posted
fred43679
Posted
Many, many thanks for your responses! I wasn’t sure if anybody would respond but this was great!
I was in my mid to late 50s when I first began having issues. It was becoming difficult for me to completely void my bladder. The problem was particularly bad at night for some reason. It seemed like staying active during the day kept me “loosened up” or something. But if I awoke during the night with a strong urge to urinate, sheesh! I could spend 10 minutes in the bathroom!
Concerned that I might have cancer I decided to see a urologist. You can imagine my relief when my PSA turned out to be almost zero !
But I still had a problem. He basically gave me two options. Drugs or surgery. They could do a “roto-rooter” on me – one day’s stay in the hospital. I chose the drugs. He put me on “Avodart” and “Flomax”. I have to admit that it really helped. After six months my urinating was pretty much back to normal. But after nine months, I suddenly developed some bad “vitreous eye floaters”.
I asked my urologist if the floaters could come from the Avodart. He basically laughed at me. “There’s no way that Avodart will give you eye floaters”. Oh yeah? I told him to “Google” it. There are pages and pages on the internet where prostate patients have complained about floaters after being on this drug. So, I stopped taking it but continue to take the Flomax. I have also discovered – entirely back accident – that a zinc supplement helps.
That brings me to the catheters. A few years ago my neighbor got BPH so bad that he wasn’t able to urinate at all and had to go to the E.R. They put him on an “indwelling” catheter which, for some unknown reason, came back out again after a couple of weeks. Was he ever surprised! He said “I can pee as well now as I could when I was 18!”
That is what gave me the idea. So, I went to the hardware store and got some 3/8” surgeon’s tubing, thoroughly rinsed it inside and out with hydrogen peroxide, and inserted it into my bladder for a few hours. Oh my! It worked! I encountered NO difficulty urinating for a day or two afterwards. Trouble was, in spite of my best efforts with the peroxide, it was still kinda “dirty” and I got a urinary tract infection. No good.
Now recently I have discovered that it is possible to buy catheters online that are 100% sterile. I have been trying “Foley” indwelling catheters that are 30fr. I like the Foley type ‘cause I think the material is less irritating than the raw latex intermittent catheters. However, I just tape ‘em to stay in. I have never tried to inflate the balloon. Not sure I’d want to try and do that. This treatment does seem to help. But, sadly, I am probably only succeeding in postponing the inevitable. One of these fine days I will probably have to get my prostate removed. After all, my dad had to. Ah, yes, growing old is so much fun, eh?
Regards,
Fred
jimjames fred43679
Posted
Hi Fred,
Not saying that a very larger catheter (30F) might not have a temporary "stent effect" which may last for awhile, but the scenario you describe with your friend may have a different interpretation. Instead urination being enhanced by the catheter widening the urethra or compressing the prostate, it could have just given the bladder some rest and decompression which made it function better when the catheter was removed. Studies have shown this.
As to using a 30F Foley, I'm all for experimentation, but this isn't something I would advise anyone to do. Have you tried catheters specifically designed for self catherization? They are usually 14F although you could go up to 16F if you wanted. I think they would be a lot more comfortable than taping a Foley to your leg and if you follow proper protocols self cathing will protect your bladder and kidneys completely. But even if your big bore Foley worked better in terms of follow up natural voids, not sure this is the best route for most.
As a suggestion, try the Coloplast Speedicath in size FR14 for starters.
Jim
barrie62598 fred43679
Posted
My 5ARI drug prescribed March 2013 to March 2014 contained the active ingredients Dutasteride and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride (Flomaxtra). Dutasteride manipulates testosterone, altering prostate cell structure to mostly reduce prostate size. I was told side effects could include headaches and dizziness as well as affect sexual stimulation and ejaculation.
When diagnosed with 3+4=7 PCa in 2016 and RP in November of that year I did my own research on 5ARI drugs. I soon wished I had done this in 2013. First the REDUCE trial raised suspicions. My pre-diagnosis Urologist said it was only Finasteride that was suspected and only for serious cancer “NOT YOURS”. Mine was serious enough for me by then. I eventually learned that the supplier of my 5ARI had itself reported 5 suspect PCa events to our Health Department (TGA). They are legally bound to report “serious” adverse events but are allowed to de-identify them. They are even allowed to omit “age” and “other medications” despite provision for these details. Gleason Score, which is critically important is also allowed to be omitted making the Drug Company’s nominated submission date the only distinguishing fact. These reports could be about anyone. They could be the tip of an iceberg.
The one thing 5ARI trials proved was that a significant number of men prescribed these drugs would progress to PCa would. This was proved true in both drug and placebo groups. My 5ARI is on our government’s Benefits Scheme and would have hundreds of thousands of users. Everyone tells me 5 or 6 in that many is a good “risks vs benefits” outcome. I just can’t see how they can isolate their 5 from the thousands of other Dutasteride CANCERS. Such a method would have to also isolate those men or prostates that will not benefit with a size reduction and possibly get an adverse cell manipulation.
Australia’s Commonwealth Ombudsman says only adverse effects detected in pre-release trials are eligible for consumer’s knowledge on information leaflets issued with drugs. Subsequent serious suspected adversities though requiring reporting do not need to be included. Urologists therefore, similar to “eye floaters” do not need to mention them to patients. Bit of a joke.
Avodart’s internet description is below and your combination appears to be similar to mine. So many names for the same drug to spread the adverse reactions. Results of a four-year study show that men who took dutasteride (Avodart), a drug commonly prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), were less likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer. However, men taking dutasteride who did develop prostate cancer were more likely to have more deadly tumors—those with a high Gleason score—than men who took a placebo.
Barrie
hank1953 fred43679
Posted
alan86734 fred43679
Posted
Hi, Fred. We have been searching for you everywhere!!! Do you want to continue participating in the "Using Catheter to Stretch Urethra"? If so, please log in. You've collected a significant fan club curious about your Fr-30 catheter. How on earth did you get it in?
Warm regards, alan86734.
oldbuzzard fred43679
Posted
The net of this is that it probably means that one of the procedures for BPH would probably help. I went into retention once, got stuck on a foley for three days and for a day, peed better than I had in years. My doc told me that meant a procedure would probably help.
If you decide to pursue it (you may not feel the need yet, depending on how much of a bother you think it is) the less invasive ones are Urolift, Rezum, PAE and FLA (which was mentioned on this thread). All have a low side effect profile and are in office procedures that can be done with minimal or no sedation. The last two are done by interventional radiologists, so your urologist won't mention them. If you have an enlarged median lobe, urolift and PAE are not indicated.
IF you decide to pursue this, get a full workup - urodynamics testing and prostate size via scope at least. If your doctor recommends TURP, Holep or Greenlight laser, find another doctor. They are all more invasive, require anesthesia, have much worse side effects and are pretty much outdated, particularly as a first option.
This is purely elective in your case, so if your quality of life is fine, there is no need to do anything right now, if you would prefer to avoid any procedure.