Very high PSA
Posted , 33 users are following.
My fiance, almost 70, has had excellent health his entire life...never hospitalized, no sutgery..just never ill. He has been athletic and is still strong and energetic. He has had restricted urine flow for past year, but no pain. His gp ordered Psa and when it was still 137, referred him to urologist and diagnosed him with BPH. Physician assistant did DRE and noted one spot and set him up for biopsy. He and I researched thoroughly and there is so much conflicting information on internet. He decided to cancel biopsy and scheduled his appointment with more experienced dr in group. Before that appointment he had another PSA and it dropped to 107. He had changed his diet in that interim.When we went to Dr appt we were prepared with so many questions. We just got even more confused and distraught. Dr did another DRE and found prostate only somewhat enlarged and found one or two unusual spots. He admitted he had never seen such a high PSA. Of course the dr wants to do a biopsy, which is scheduled for later this month. He told us that he likely had stage 3 or 4 cancer and purpose of biopsy was to determine what kind of cancer. He admitted he would certainly recommend removing prostate and then radiation and/or chemotherapy. We begged him to order the tests like ultrasound and or bone scan and blood tests to determine if cancer had metasticized without undergoing the risks of biopsy, especially at his age. He refused.
Can anyone give us ideas as to what might cause the high PSA other than cancer. These are our concerns. It appears that just about every 70 year old has cancer cells in prostate as the prostate seems to be vulnerable to chronic health issues, maybe due to proximity to colon (he has been extremely constipated for same year as restricted urine). Other than urine flow issues he is very healthy. We have heard that cadmium is directly related to prostate issues but dr is not interested in etiology of issues. Also, he has had clow Testosterone for two decades, together with extreme loss of hair on legs, and chronic ED, and sometimes blood in ejaculate. We have learned that low Testosterone leads to prostate issues but Drs don't seem to pay any attention to it...but to us, the signs and symptoms are possibly related to some problem that is causing the unusual PSA. We just don't want to fall headlong into a prostate cancer treatment if the real cause is something like a glandular or brain driven hormonal slump that drives up PSA.
Does anyone have experience with these outrageous psa numbers, How can we get dr to order tests to determine spread of any prostate cancer without risks of invasive surgery.
1 like, 37 replies
carl05115 jj1003
Posted
With that said, my best to your fiance......and to you. Carl
carl05115 jj1003
Posted
It never ceases to amaze me how little physicians seem to understand about PSA. And just to keep you interested in what I am writing, my PSA is just over 100. And for what it is worth, I have not had any treatment for cancer nor do I anticipate having teatment. In my country prostate cancer is wildly overtreated. An important thing for you to read in its entirety would be The US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendations on Prostate Cancer.
Back in 1995, at the age of 50 my doctor recommended that I be given a routine PSA test (the first mistake). It came back a 10 so he then ordered a biopsy. A blind biopsy came back negative and a follow-up biopsy two years later also came back negative (at that point my prostate had been stuck a total of 16 times with a needle that tracked feces into my prostate and tracked prostate cancer cells out of the capsule the prostate lives in.....a conceptually flawed methodology if I ever heard of one). I am certain that I had prostate cancer 20 years ago, it just wasn't found with the biopsy needles. In 2005 with a PSA approaching 26 I went for a color doppler guided biopsy and watched as they stuck needles in hot-spots (blood engorged areas in my prostate). Two of eight needles came back positive for adenocarcinoma (cancer). Gleason was rated a 3 + 4 (you should also look up grade creep, a phenomenon that is the result of a vigorous malpractice industry in my country). My urologist recommended a prostatectomy but could only justify his recommendation by telling me "people get a prostate diagnosis and get scared and want it out." Scared didn't seem like a very good justification for a surgery that would dramatically alter my life, so I refused, met with a much older urologist who quietly confided that he wouldn't have my cancer treated if it were him. He explained that my cancer is slow growing Gleason 3, diploid, and a very long PSA doubling time (approximately five years). The latter is a very important concept to wrap your mind around. A slow-growing cancer doubles in two or more years, fast growing in less than two years. But what that means is it would double from 2 to 4 in the first two year period but it would double from 64 to 128 in the sixth two year period. While the latter looks scary, it is the same slow doubling time.
What I don't know about your husband is what his PSA doubling time is. The high number could mean that he's had a slow-growing, non life threatening prostate cancer for a very long time (like me). Also, it would appear that your fiance's PSA is very erratic. That can be caused by such simple things as an infection, sexual activity including masturbation, injury, etc.
With regard to testosterone, there are also many misunderstandings. First, prostate cancer is extremely rare in young men who have very high testosterone typically. The incidence of prostate cancer predictably goes up as men age and their testosterone levels predictably decline. There is a belief that prostate cancer feeds on testosterone and that is to a degree true. So, in order for it to live as it is it needs a daily dose or feeding. When you go on hormone blocking, the cancer gets activated and often mutates into androgen (testosterone) independent cancer, a much more virulent, aggressive and potentially life threatening version of prostate cancer.
Like your fiance, cancer wants to live. When you tease it, abuse it, or otherwise taunt it then it mutates and eventually metastasizes in order to continue to live. While it is true that if you have a very aggressive cancer (hard to define)......maybe Gleason 8, more likely Gleason 9 or 10; haploid vs diploid, rapid PSA doubling time; and you're less than 65 you might consider treatment otherwise, read the US Preventative Services Task Force Recommendations on Prostate Cancer.....it will open your eyes!
Finally, prostate cancer is considered the "old man's disease." At 70 years old your fiance has a 50 50 chance of having prostate cancer. Clearly, far and away most men die of something else. The modal age of death from prostate cancer in the US is 82 and a graph of age at death shows a skew to older age. A 65 year old man in the US has a life expectancy of 18 years.
I am taking my chances with prostate cancer and avoiding treatment. I have no symptoms and am enjoying life.
But ultimately it is between you and your fiance to make the call. I wish you the very best, Carl
craig84609 jj1003
Posted
hirdesh48371 jj1003
Posted
He is diabetes patient.
andre22955 jj1003
Posted
HI
I am 81 PSA 48.
I had a T2 type scan then Template Guided Prostate Biopsies with general anaesthesia.
I was told that there was no cancer and that the high PSA was probably caused by having an enlarged prostate.
I would strongly recommend this procedure to anyone who has prostae problems and can afford K£4
philip02001 jj1003
Posted
tom86211 philip02001
Posted
Philip,
Very sorry to hear about the ordeal you are going through. One thing that really caught my attention was your statement "..but is this better than surgery chemo or radiation treatments."
Like you, I had increasing PSA, two biopsies, but positive results from the biopsies for low risk prostate cancer (Gleason 6). My conclusion was that all of this testing and sampling and anxiety WAS a form of treatment, that never had any resolution.
So, after several years of reasearch and interviewing many top doctors, I decided to move forward with treatment. I decided on HDR - High Dose Brachytherapy.
I went in for two painless and easy treatment sessions spaced two weeks apart. The only side effect was prostate swelling after the second treatment. I had to wear a catheter for 5 weeks until the swelling subsided.
My PSA is now down to 0.2 and holding. My prostate continues to shrink and it's getting easier to urinate. Treatment was performed in Sept. of 2014.
There will never be another biopsy. The anxiety is gone. I have stopped spending half my waking life reading about prostate issues.
I have two more friends who had the robotic surgery, and the side effects are not good - ED and incontinence. I am just fine in both departments.
My very best to you,
Tom
tom86211 philip02001
Posted
Philip,
" is this better than surgery chemo or radiation treatments.like to hear your comments..". Went through the routine - rising PSA, biopsies, testing every 3 months etc. Very stressful. Finally, decided to have my prostate cancer treated. Interviewed many doctors. Decided to go with HDR - high dose brachytherapy. HIFU was not available for me and Proton Beam was not available in my area.
Two treatments, no pain, very easy. Did get some prostate swelling after second treatment so had to have a catheter for a 5 weeks until swelling went down.
Now, no issues. PSA 0.2 and steady. Worries gone. Stress gone. High PSA can be caused by many factors other than cancer - BPH or infection. The doubling every 40 months is a negative, but the fact that the biopsies and scans can't detect any cancer is also a mystery.
If you do, eventually, get a positive diagnosis for even low grade prostate cancer I can tell you that getting some type of treatment is a LOT easier than going through all this testing and constant worry.
What you are now going through is taking over your life. You want to get your life back and put this all behind you if possible.
Best of luck...
Tom
Gissim0 jj1003
Posted
There's a load of bs about this. My psa has always been 1.8, 2.2..... but one time I was in the hospital for a minor heart problem and a random psa test showed a psa of 43. The doctor told me I probably had prostate cancer and it is serious at that level. So my urologist prescribed 2 weeks antibia tics because a dre showed nothing. In 2 weeks it was down quite a bit, and 6 months later it was back at 2. The facts are that even at a psa of 40, you only have a 67% chance of having prostate cancer. My father in law has a psa of 6.8 and he had prostate cancer. He had seed implants and died at age 85, 15 years later and of a heart attack.
nealpros Gissim0
Posted
Neal
geoff90305 jj1003
Posted
My jouney just begins at 67. With a PSA average of 2.4 over the last 12 years. In April I had a severe UTI, which happened a month before my annual blood test. After the UTI subsided with antibiotics my PSA went from 2.4 to 12 over a 4 month period and still rising. Here is Australia, takes a 2-3 months to see urologist. So while waiting, I am thinking about getting a mpMRI ($500)with a tesla 3 machine. This way, I can front up with my blood/urine work as well as the MRI, which should help? Also, I will get the results of the MRI before my urologist visit, so this may put my mind at rest...or otherwise, when I read the radiologist report.
While understand the logic of the biopsy, not sure if jabbing and provoking the prostate and causing it to bleed into my system with possibly cancer cells such a good idea. Hoping the mpMRI will say, "you have prostatitus" or maybe, ummm, some thing not right there.. Anyway, will report back later.
Jed
craig84609 geoff90305
Posted
pete83591 jj1003
Posted
HI All,
I am 41 and had a regular blood test 4 weeks ago and my PSA was 74... 1 week later the doctor felt my prostate and said it feels normal and asked for me to come back 3 weeks later for another psa test. My psa has risen to 82... There is no infection shown in bloods or urine test.
I am being referred to a Urologist and expect to see him within 2 weeks.
I am so frightened that I have cancer and can't think what else it can be? Everything seems to point to Cancer and haven't spoken with anyone that's made any sense... Is 82 really high? Should I be worried?
Any advice would be gratefully received?
For all of you on here that are have been diagnosed or know someine going through it.I wish you all a speedy recovery.
geoff90305 pete83591
Posted
pete, start a new thread, 'Very high PSA' rather than hijack jj's This way you keep all "your" comments together rather than mix them. It gets confusing as to who you are answering.
My quick advice is to get a mpMRI on a 3T MRI machine asap. I was in a similar position to you, though much lower PSA, and MRI confirmed chronic prostatitus and BPH.
Geoff
question geoff90305
Posted
geoff90305 question
Posted
jim01126 geoff90305
Posted
Hi Jeff,
My first PSA at age 52 was 2.0 and bounced around a little then started rising.
Last year at age 64 it was 8.1 and this year it jumped to 15.3 I was diagnosed in 2011 with BPH and prostatitis with PSA 4.5 and the urologist said I had significant enlargement. 2012 PSA 6.00 and another urologist says I have substantial enlargement and prostatitis. I declined biopsies. Prostatitis symptoms still come and go with sometimes burning when I pee, painful ejaculation, swollen testicles, swollen lymph node in pubic area, sense of sitting on a golf ball. 2016 PSA 8.00 and recent PSA 15.3 My dad was diagnosed with prostatitis and BPH and and had classic symptoms. He died at at 73 of heart attack. I'm being scheduled with urologist again. Do you think my BPH and prostatitis could give me the PSA of 15.3 ? I know prostate continues to grow. What was your PSA ?
Thanks ! Jim