What is a good ferritin level?
Posted , 5 users are following.
Hi everyone! First I want to point out I'm in the US in case my numbers look different from others around this forum. I had a blood test done on August 5th which showed by ferritin level was 32. A month later another blood test showed my level had dropped to 16. 2 different doctors and both told me I was "fine" just on the low side of normal. I don't know what to do or where I should be at on this level. Can anyone please help? Also I just started taking floradix. I've heard great things about it. *fingers crossed*
0 likes, 8 replies
scott36798 mckul6
Posted
rachhj34 mckul6
Posted
Not sure what symptoms you have or how ill you've been feeling. I was really unwell at ferritin 29 and I had been for a while before I got tested and Im guessing it was even higher then. After 6 weeks I dropped to 16 and my drs still classes it as normal!! By this point I felt dreadful. Drs really don't seem to have a very good understanding... Keep on at them as you shouldn't be fobbed off!
gill70346 mckul6
Posted
jenny19687 mckul6
Posted
If you are not experiencing symptoms then there isn't any problems. There is some research that at least 70 is needed to reverse hairloss etc.
gill70346 jenny19687
Posted
That is not actually true. I wasn't having any symptoms but because the blood test showed mild anaemia it still had to be investigated and as a result tomorrow I have to have a liver resection. In other words, the borderline anaemia was the first indication that I might have liver disease. Because there are no symptoms in the early stages the NHS guidelines say that if you have anaemia for the first time over the age of 60 it has to be treated and investigated even if there are no symptoms.
jenny19687 mckul6
Posted
The reply was in response to what is a good level of ferritin as opposed to the range given when people feel symptoms although they are in the "range".
I was as once told that mildly anemic but when I queried it with another doctor was told there is no such medical term.
If you are below the range you should always ensure that adequate investigations and monitoring occurs.
gill70346 jenny19687
Posted
Sorry, I was just referring to the fact that you said "if you are not experiencing any symptoms, there aren't any problems"
rachhj34 mckul6
Posted