Why might my opthamologist refuse to use the Vivity Toric IOL because I had Lasik?

Posted , 4 users are following.

I had very successful monovision Lasik surgery (i.e., no need for glasses at all) about 15 years ago, and now that I need cataract lens replacement, I wanted to replicate that success. I've gathered that a standard monofocal monovision approach could leave a focus gap between reading and distance, and that the EDOF monofocal lenses (such as Vivity) would address that by slightly overlapping the left and right eye focal performance. I have moderate astigmatism but nothing extreme. I do a lot of reading and computer work.

Vivity is my surgeon's IOL of choice, but he won't use it (or multifocals) with patients who have had Lasik surgery.

Is there a good reason for this? Should I find another surgeon?

Am I ignoring the value of basic monofocal lenses tuned for monovision?

Are there other good options that I am overlooking?

0 likes, 7 replies

7 Replies

  • Edited

    I think the basic reasons that surgeons do not want to do MF or EDOF with prior Lasik are:

    .

    1. Lasik makes it harder to measure the eye accurately and get the correct IOL power. If they miss the power it can compromise vision which may compound the inherent optical issues common with these lenses.
    2. These lenses are susceptible to halo and flare on their own. The scar tissue left by the prior Lasik can compound the halo and flare problem.

    .

    If the power is selected correctly there is no gap in vision with a monovision solution. The ideal power for the non dominant near focus eye leaves you at -1.5 D myopic. And it is best to correct any astigmatism with a toric monofocal lens at the same time.

    .

    It sounds like your surgeon prefers Alcon lenses. What I would ask for is a monofocal (toric if you are going to be left with 0.75 or more cylinder) with the power to achieve -0.25 in the dominant eye, and -1.5 D in the non dominant eye. Clareon is the newest monofocal that Alcon has and I would get that one if possible. If you need a toric and it is not available in Clareon than I would go for the AcrySof IQ instead. Be sure to ask the surgeon if your astigmatism is irregular or not. A toric lens may not correct irregular astigmatism properly. And, prior Lasik increases the risk it may be irregular. The good news is that if you can get the correct sphere with the monofocal lenses, any residual astigmatism, even if it is irregular can be corrected with Lasik post surgery. Before going into cataract surgery you should have a full plan with your surgeon of what you can do with post surgery Lasik.

    .

    I mention this need for a Lasik plan as I got myself into a bit of a jam with the second eye of my monovision. I wanted -1.5 D, but I have irregular astigmatism that I could not get a straight answer out of the surgeon on whether could be corrected or not with a toric IOL. We finally decided to not use the toric and he talked me down to a -1.25 D target because he said the astigmatism would give me some reading. So now I have ended up with a little less myopia than ideal and on top of that some shadow images on letter due to the astigmatism. I can read well, but not as good as I could if I was -1.50 with no astigmatism. If I had it to do all over again, I would have stuck with my target of -1.50 and dealt with the astigmatism after the fact. I have found out that correcting astigmatism is relatively easy, but making the eye more myopic is difficult. One Lasik clinic has turned me down. I am now waiting for a consult at a second clinic to see if they believe it can be done accurately. I am looking for a -0.25 to -0.5 D increase in myopia. That seems to be less than the normal margin of error when going in the myopic direction.

    • Posted

      Thank you for this thorough explanation. It's given me additional questions to ask the surgeon, too.

  • Edited

    In a way I'd think IOLs like Vivity and Eyhance could be BETTER in post-Lasik eyes because they have a wider "landing zone" or "sweet spot" than a monofocal, so they are more forgiving of refractive error (Lasik makes hitting the target less predictable).

    .

    That said I've also heard that Lasik can reduce contrast sensitivity so maybe your surgeon is worried about that given that Vivity is know to alreasy be starting from a somewhat low baseline in terms of contrast?

    .

    Maybe J&J Eyhance mini-monovision would be a solution both you could both agree on? The Eyhance monofocal is supposed to have almost identical image quality and contrast to a regular monofocal but with a slightly extended range. That could help with both hitting the targets (bigger "sweet spot" is good for post-Lasik eyes) and with the focus overlap you're hoping to achieve (wouldn't need quite as big an offset as with regular monofocals)

    • Posted

      I think we're going to go with toric monofocals to reach the monovision result. He said there should be sufficient overlap to provide near, mid, and distance vision.

      The doc's objection to Vivity extends to Eyehance as well. Their defocus just softens things too much.

    • Edited

      Sounds like maybe he's a monofocal "absolutist". My surgeon is the same. He never wants to use anything other than a standard monofocal. Although somehow (after doing his own research) he agreed to do Eyhance with me. He said it sounded like a very good lens and people are getting good results. I get the feeling he's actually excited to try it out. He'd never do Vivity though. I'd have to go to a private clinic for that (and pay $6K)

    • Posted

      He's just very conservative. And he works through public health not a private clinic so a premium IOL would be kind of a non-starter through him anyway. I'd have to go elsewhere. Public health doesn't use premium IOLs because presbyopia correction is not considered medically necessary. Also, as a perfectionist he feels strongly that I wouldn't be happy with Vivity. I don't know about that but whatever.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.