Why Urolift isn't that successful in the US
Posted , 15 users are following.
I've been reading a lot of reviews/patient experiences that have been bad with Urolift. I think the problem in the US is that it is so extremely lucrative that urologists can't pass it up. Ken had a good outcome probably because his condition was a good fit for it. A larger uncomplicated prostate with no middle lobe or bladder neck issues. Mine was a smaller more "funky" shape. My doctor does 10 a day, a couple times a month. At 15K a pop that's 150K a day or about $1000.00 a minute, for the procedure. If you are over 40 and have difficulty urinating the default diagnosis with no testing is BPH and the default solution is a 15k urolift office procedure. If it doesn't work, then maybe a 15-20k follow-up Turp procedure. There is no incentive to do urodynamic testing to determine if the problem might be bladder related. I wish I had read more of the "not so good" reviews before having the procedure. Now I am worried that I have 6 implants that might break loose down the road and cause issues when the result didn't really improve my condition and was painful and expensive. My suggestion to anyone considering it would be to get a second opinion from another doctor that has no financial incentive
0 likes, 29 replies
bb26995 benThere
Edited
It always wise to get second urologist opinions about BPH. I eventually saw 5 of them!
I urge men who are avoiding seeing a urologist (due to the common negativity about them) to still see a urologist.
Don't like one, go to another until you find a uro you can trust to get tested, have a clear diagnosis & get treatment to avoid or minimize retention.
This is what I've learned after 3 cystoscopys, a urodynamic test & consultations.
There are several urology conditions which a Urolift & certain other less invasive procedures cannot help much.
These include but are not limited to;
A. Damage to the bladder due to retention. This may require catheters to allow the bladder muscles to recover.
B. Blockage at the bladder neck due to an enlarged prostate.
These conditions could cause urinary retention which the Urorlift has poor results in helping.
Importantly, the people on these forums are not medical doctors (including me). Which goes back to my first recommendation.
Find a urologist who is right for you.
lester90053 bb26995
Posted
After consulting 5 uros what did you decide?
bb26995 lester90053
Posted
Hi Lester; Short answer; My situation was partly described in my previous comment.
Added to that I did the Urolift and eventually had a bi-polar TURP.
I use an intermittent catheter at the end of the day at midnight to empty residue.
Very long answer; Every man's situation is different. Again find a urologist/treatment which is right for you.
I had avoided seeing a urologist in early 2018 for various reasons which I won't get into now. Result; I had severe retention last summer, went to the ER & had a permanent/Foley catheter put in.
First procedure; I found a urologist who was awarded by NeoTract for the Urolift. I wanted to see if this would work and keep my prostate intact. (I had two cystoscopys with him. This urologist was the local hospital department head but was not good at explaining things. He was usually too busy.)
Unfortunately the Urolift did not work. I still had a Foley catheter.
Second urologist; I found a uro who did the urodynamic test. This showed I still had some bladder strength but his report said I could not completely empty my bladder even with no obstruction.
He recommended a TURP to be done by urologist #3.
Third urologist; he did a cystoscopy and showed me the screen. He said the blockage was in the bladder neck where no minimal invasive procedure could reach. His report said the median lobe was not involved. He recommended a TURP.
Fourth urologist; This was a top expert. He reviewed reports from urologists 2 & 3. He said damage to the bladder could mean trouble urinating no matter what the surgical procedure. He said sometimes the Urolift didn't open up all of the urethra.
He recommended the intermittent catheter to improve bladder strength. I had failed to learn this with two nurses. I used a Foley with a valve (no bag). He said that was OK but the intermittent catheter was better.
For surgery, he recommended a TURP which he would do with a Greenlight laser. (With any TURP I would have retrograde ejaculation.)
In January I learned the intermittent catheter. I did it every 3 to 4 hours. It was painful, slow (40 minutes each time) & hard on my back standing and limited what I could do even compared with the Foley+valve.
I decided on the TURP surgery to reduce my intermittent caths.
What kind; laser or bi-polar, should I have?
Driving distance was a problem as my wife can't drive more than 30 miles. Uro #4 is 60 miles away which ruled him out.
Fifth urologist; He was 30 miles away and was an expert with the greenlight laser. He preferred it. But after reviewing all my documents, he said a bi-polar TURP would be the best choice for me. He said it was precise in completely clearing a path for urine flow.
First urologist; I went back to him because he was 10 miles away & was also an expert with the greenlight laser TURP. He said if he did my TURP it would be the bi-polar.
I had urologist #1 do the TURP procedure.
Besides a short driving distance, he had one of the best nurses (a nurse practitioner) who did the follow up.
Outcome; my life is normal except for two things.
I intermittent cath at midnight for 30 minutes. CIC is easier now but I wouldn't want to do it on a plane.
Second retrograde ejaculation in some ways is uncomfortable. But I knew it would happen and before the TURP my sex life was almost zero since the summer.
Final thoughts; I'm going to dinner tonight for the entire evening at a busy restaurant with friends. I can do that now since the TURP. I feel I have most of my life back.
kenneth1955 bb26995
Posted
Hello BB
I just have to say a few words. You had the Urolift and it did not work because your prostate was not the problem. You bladder neck was.
I am happy that you took the time to get a lot of opinions. By the way how big was your procedure. And being your prostate was not the problem. I wonder if a Bladder Neck Incision would have worked for you instead.
The Turp worked to a point but you still have to do CIC. So what was the point of doing the procedure. If it come to doing CIC or a Turp Why just do the CIC and forget the surgery if you still have to do CIC
Did your doctor tell you that before your surgery and why you still have to do CIC??
Just asking. I hope you improve and get better.....Ken
bb26995 kenneth1955
Posted
Kenneth; I wonder where this discussion will go.
This is from the Healthline website; "An enlarged prostate is often responsible for causing bladder neck obstruction."
I have a masters degree in psychology but I don't speculate to people about what specific urology treatment they should do especially contradicting the advice of several doctors. Why? Because I am not a urologist.
Also, keep in mind you do not do CIC. And please don't bring up experiences with CIC from people you know. The comfort with CIC varies depending on the patient. I explained in my post why I wanted to reduce its frequency.
bb26995
Posted
PS. From katelarisurology website about the TURP and bladder neck obstruction;
"TURP is the gold standard treatment for prostatic bladder neck obstruction."
kenneth1955 bb26995
Posted
Dear BB
It can go on forever if we want. You picked what was good for you. It just that if the urolift pull you open and it was not a median lobe. What part of the prostate was blocking the inside of the bladder neck
I'm glad what you picked work for you somewhat but that was you choice. Very happy for you. And I do do CIC sometime to keep my stricture open. Works great.
I hope all goes well for you. And if a Turp procedure was so great they would not have come up with other treatment for BPH. I am not giving anyone advice I wasjust asking a question because the way I read your post it was your bladder neck that was the problem
Have a great day
bb26995 kenneth1955
Posted
Ken; we've had a discussion before and it didn't go far because you do not accept the statements from the urologists I've seen and plain text from the internet which I provided to you.
In this discussion, I've answered your questions but you refuse to accept the answers.
As for why urologists use the TURP. Every urologist website I've found, every urologist I've seen, has the TURP as one of the procedures that they perform.
Why ask me why the TURP is done? I'm not a urologist.
My suggestion. Ask your urologist.
Why ask me why there are other BPH procedures? I had a Urolift but I'm not a urologist.
Again I advise, talking to your urologist about this.
What you read was what you wanted to see and not accept what I wrote about urologist opinions and my answer to you which had quotes from the internet.
The prostate can cause an obstruction at the bladder neck. Ask your urologist why this can happen is my advice to you.
On a more positive note.
Thank you for telling me you do a CIC sometimes.
As every patient's experience is different, my CIC experience was very difficult for reasons I've explained.
kenneth1955 bb26995
Posted
BB
It is not problem I remember talking to you before. I was just asking a question.
I'm not trying to get you mad It was just a question. The way I read it is you had a urolift and it did not work. ( My prostate is still wide open still ) Also you said that it was not a median lobe. So what was blocking the bladder neck The prostate only has so many lobe. Was your prostate large.
My urologist and his partner do very few Turps. When I talk to him a few months ago They have only done 3 in the last year. He said it is a last resort procedure.
Being everyone is different and we all have different concerns.
I wish you well and hope all works out for you...Ken
I think Turp was a standard when they went to school. Life goes on
hank1953 bb26995
Posted
bb, given the circumstances, you did as well as it could be done. Congratulations, and thanks for sharing. I am just curious, why does it take you so long to do CIC ? What catheters are you using?
dean97628 benThere
Posted
i had a Urolift 5 weeks ago it was a complete failure . i gave not been able to pee since the procedure and currently have a Foley catheter in. the urologist who did the urolift now says he needs to remove my entire prostate to fix it . i found another urologist who believes he can fix me with a TURP . i sincerely wished i had never had a urolift done
Mike321 benThere
Posted
I agree 100%. My Urolift made my condition worse and after weeks of physical therapy I want back to them doc. His answer was to increase my pill dosage. I had them Urolift so I wouldn't need pills and now I needed a higher dose. This thing needs to be banned!