A Pro Statin article by Miriam Stoppard
Posted , 6 users are following.
The other side of the arguement
http://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/health/ignore-medias-scare-stories-keep-8318150
0 likes, 41 replies
Posted , 6 users are following.
The other side of the arguement
http://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/health/ignore-medias-scare-stories-keep-8318150
0 likes, 41 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
paul59419 derek76
Posted
As usual statistics are being used for the wrong reason and always being used in a negative way. If you invert the statistics it looks far better and no Doctor can say that you are in the real at risk area pnly that your coditions woudl indicate this.
As a patient who has been on statins my life style is far better now that I am off statins than it was when i was one them. I value quality of life rather than length of life. As you get older the risk of dementia is greater and then dying from Dementia is worse than a heart attack at least one is quick the other is a long slow painful death and a morning period for the loved ones in life. I have experience this and its not nice for the person with dementia or the loved ones.
derek76 paul59419
Posted
She had been in good health and of good mind at 82 when she delayed an operation to remove a kidney due to a tumor as she was travelling to and around Canada on her own for a month. After the operation she could not remember much about her trip or look after herself.
In her case it was the anesthetic not pills that caused her problem.
derek76 paul59419
Posted
A friend in America was put on six different statins at the same time for his very high readings taking them at different times of day. After a while he started on the joint pains and muscle weakness. By then his doctor had retired and he went to see the new one. In his next E-Mail he said 'I like my new Doctor I told him that I like my meat and potatoes chips but I don’t like the statin side effects'
The doctor said, your 82 and should be allowed to eat what you want and not bother with statins. That was about two years ago but sadly his muscles and joints are getting progressively worse.
lee12629 derek76
Posted
derek76 lee12629
Posted
Who knows what is the norm in America? He was a very smart fellow but trusted his doctor until too late.
It's a wonder I still have any doctors as i queery every thing. Some new consultants ask if I have a medical background as I give them my symptoms so well.
lee12629 derek76
Posted
derek76 lee12629
Posted
lee12629 derek76
Posted
jenna123 derek76
Posted
hello...sorry you all going through - a friend of my mine in his mid forties has been taking atoravastatin 20 mg for 8 years...he is not feeling any muscle pain, depression or any such side effects and feels just fine..I particularly asked him.
I have been taking myself 10 mg. of atoravastatin for the past 3 years and then stopped for 3 months to see if the aches and pains are related but there were there and its the cause of age and menopause...but I am not having any debilitating pain. just normal aches but I still do yoga and zumba ....
usch jenna123
Posted
I used to take simvastatin for about 8 years and thought that I was ok. Then my GP prescibed atorvastatin 40mg - because apparently my totl cholesterol at 4.4 was still too high.
The side effects were devastating, but, I did not associate them to the use of statins until the 'statins controversy was highlighted in the social media.
And, I think, this is the underlying danger of the use of statins. Initially, side effects are mild and people contribute them to getting older without asking any further questions. But, the negative effect of statins use is building up.
I think the prescription of them as a preventative medicine is highly irresponsible.
derek76 jenna123
Posted
jenna123 usch
Posted
jenna123 derek76
Posted
usch jenna123
Posted
I now know that it is nonsense, but, for some reason GP's are instructed to get people they consider in the 'high risk group' to lower their total cholesterol to 4, which is nonsense in itself because it ignores the LDL:HDL ratio. My HDL has always been on the high side - around 2 - which pushed my total cholesterol up. I have done a lot of research since the side effects became very apparent. I think I am better informed than most GP's.
My recent check was:- total 5.8, LDL 3, HDL 2.3,tric .5
This is without any statins.
GP's are instructed to offer statins to anybody with a total reading above 4. I have now refused them, and will refuse them forever.
derek76 usch
Posted
I say the same about my 7.4 blood glucose figure.