Baclofen for alcoholism
Posted , 10 users are following.
I'm 47 year old woman and was drinking up to 3 bottles of wine a day for years.although it was a slow progression from teenage years till now.I have been on it since 9th of August and didn't believe it would work for me but had to give it a go as I was desperate.Well it hit my SWITCH as they call it on 26th of August.I can't believe is that simple.I just don't want to drink anymore.Have even been to the pub for lunch and it doesn't interest me at all.This drug WORKS!!....Just can't see how it will get approved for drug abuse anytime soon as its out of patent and all that entails.Side effects are pretty severe but so is being drunk all the time
3 likes, 25 replies
rayboy250 nicole36330
Posted
vickylou nicole36330
Posted
i first mentioned nalfemene to my key worker after being referred to ADS by my GP. She'd never heard of it! I ended up printing off some info for her. At my next appointment she said she'd discussed it with her manager, but it was something they wouldn't recommend.
Went back to gp who said he wouldn't prescribe some weird American trial.
Thanks to Joanna on this forum, I was able to get reliable info, stats to show success rate, and NICE guidelines and went this week to see a different gp. Waste of time, because the answer was the same, wouldn't prescribe it. Only way I could get it would be paying to see a private physciatrist and paying for a private prescription.
sophie02444 nicole36330
Posted
I have taken baclofen for 12 months so I known what you are talking about. I can vouch for its amazing effects too!!. It is really amazing isn't it? just the feeling to be yourself again and able to take the right decision without constant stress/interference of wanting a drink.
Baclofen is actually a very cheap drug as you know and if you muster the courage to go to your GP you can refer to the BACLAD study from Germany. It is the first study double blind and placebo and it was published earlier this year. Of course it shows its fantastic anti-craving effect.
As you know be prepared to face a lot of ignorance about this treatment. It may be better to wait unetil the BACLOVILLE (France) study is out. This should be at the end of the year.
Thank you for your testimony as it will help a lot people who get desperate.
Good for you to have thought out of the box and seek a treatment which works. You'll have a good life without this brain addiction that is called an "alcool problem".
Vanessa
PS unfortunately namalfene appears to me as a waste of time and tax payer money. It is marginally effective (see European drug agency report) and much more expensive than baclofen.
vickylou sophie02444
Posted
sophie02444 vickylou
Posted
to answer your query : Yes baclofen is very different from namalfene (which is a naltrexone derivative).
I am probably to blunt but Namalfene has shown only little efficiency to reduce alcohol consumption.
Here are the hard facts :
The Drug Evaluation German Agency (IQWIG) made its conclusion on December 1: “Nalmefene for alcohol dependence: no benefit evidenced” (https://www.iqwig.de/en/press/press-releases/press-releases/nalmefene-for-alcohol-dependence-added-benefit-not-proven.6458.html).
c. The French Health Authority concluded that nalmefene trials showed little evidence for an improvement in actual benefit when compared to existing treatments (rating =4, on a scale of 5 to 1, the highest). The agency advised to restrict prescription to addiction specialists considering the major importance of psycho-social care, a difficult condition to achieve in general practice. Such restriction is rarely used by the Commission (http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1737894/en/selincroenct12915english-version).
d. The Swedish Agency for health assessment concluded (March 31, 2015) to the lack of interest of nalmefene compared to existing treatments and did not recommend its reimbursement (http://www.tlv.se/beslut/beslut-lakemedel/avslag-uteslutningar/Selincro-ingar-inte-i-hogkostnadsskyddet/).
Fourth, who will benefit from nalmefene? Monthly cost for nalmefene in France is €101.34 vs €36.07 for naltrexone. The psychosocial support, a key element in the care of patients with addiction but it is not reimbursed by the health care scheme. Accordingly, this money could have been better used to cover two monthly psychologist visits.
etc...
etc..
etc..
On the bright side the BACLAD study shows uneprecedented efficiency for Baclofen vs. placebo. and baclofen is off patent and very cheap. Hopefully the BACLOVILLE will confirm its efficiency.
If Namalfene works for you : I am sincerely happy. I am just worried that people become fed up with taking all these drugs and end up refusing helpful treatment when they will finaly be available on the NHS.
With my deepest respect for all the fighters I am reading about on this website, whatever their weapon of choice. :-)
ray21540 nicole36330
Posted
If not happy with that take it to the commissioner's. Used to be the PCT maybe PCG now.
vickylou ray21540
Posted
From your point of view, you wouldn't say its a waste of space and waste of tax payers' money then?
rayboy250 vickylou
Posted
Ray
vickylou rayboy250
Posted
i was replying to another poster who said it was a waste of space and a waste of tax payers money. I didn't say that at all. I fully agree with you. I can't get it, but am pleased that it works for you, and yes you and hundreds of others are saving the NHS money
nicole36330
Posted