BPH - natural treatments vs TURP, open surgery
Posted , 14 users are following.
I'm 59 with an enlarged prostate (120 cc), which is 4x normal size for my age. I had an MRI-fusion guided biopsy 18 mos. ago that showed no cancer. Another 3T-MP MRI a year later showed nothing of suspicion. However, following my Bx in 2015 my PSA has shot up (10) and bounced all over between 5 and 7. Before the Bx, my PSA was between 3.5 and 4.5. I have tried every natural supplement out there, including DIM, IC3, progesterone cream, beta sitosterol, pygeum, maca, etc. Things have gotten worse since the Bx. My prostate might be too big for TURP, TUIP, but I might be a candidate for GreenLight, and open prostatectomy is an option. Anyone have any success with alternative medicine or is surgery 100% a given for a man in my situation? PS - I bled for weeks after the biopsy and my symptoms have only worsened. I won't go thru that again.
0 likes, 98 replies
reg52510 MichaelVM7
Posted
I tried natural supplements without a noticable response to my symptoms: flomax didn't help much either. There are many alternatives out there now so I suggest (if you haven't already) investigate each one to determine if the treatment fits your situation. PAE, Holep, urolift, etc. are all treatments but each man's situation is somewhat different. Have you had different opinions from different urologists? What do they tell you?
MichaelVM7 reg52510
Posted
Good advice, thank you.
Have seen two uro's. One recommended TURP last year, the other is more conservative and says to hold out on any procedure as long as I can. I did read that for very big prostates, TURP is a little riskier...and at 120 cc, mine is very large.
Flomax helps me urinate (normal flow) but I have zero libido. I can't use Proscar because of strong family cancer incidence, and Proscar can cause aggressive cancer type is some men.
I think I've taken over the last 6 months more saw palmetto than most men take in 20 years. Same for maca, curcumin, pumpkin seed oil, zinc, sitosterols, and on and on it goes....
I've tried every "natural" supplement in the known universe.
I'll check out PAE. And HoLEP. I dread having to do an open prostatectomy for BPH. I can see something that drastic for a high grade, local cancer, but for BPH? But if it means 20 years of misery or major surgery, that becomes a difficult decision.
mark23925 MichaelVM7
Posted
MichaelVM7 mark23925
Posted
I'd almost prefer open prostatectomy to TURP. I hope for a way to avoid both.
Michael
reg52510 MichaelVM7
Posted
kenneth1955 mark23925
Posted
kenneth1955 MichaelVM7
Posted
Michael do you have prostate cancer. If you do There are other ways to take care of it. And most of the cancers are slow growing. You could have 10 to 15 years. Why cause a problem. There are other meds and procedure to shrink the prostate Don't let them push you into anything. Remember you are the one that will have to deal with the side effects. Not them Ken
MichaelVM7 kenneth1955
Posted
Ken,
Based on 2015 biopsy and recent MP-MRI that showed nothing suspicious, it's not likely I have cancer.
MP-MRI 3T is more accurate than biopsy when both show negative results.
I have family history of PCa. That's probably why I can't use Proscar to shrink the prostate. That would relieve some symptoms. But some guys run the risk of Gleason 8 and higher cancer from Proscar.
Seems like everything with the prostate is a percentage game.
Michael
kenneth1955 MichaelVM7
Posted
james87669 MichaelVM7
Posted
Had no luck with supplements. Highly suggest you research HoLEP, which proved to be excellent for me and a multitude of others with situations similar to yours. Open prostatectomy is a BIG DEAL with higher oportunity for side dffects i.e. ED and incontinence and a longer recouperation time. HoLEP is the modern day "TURP" and absolutely the best way to go in my opinion.
MichaelVM7 james87669
Posted
wow, thanks James. Will definitely research HoLEP further.
I literally cringe when thinking about TURP and the thought of a week in the hospital and a week or longer with a catheter following open surgery is equally distressful.
Seems like decisions for BPH are harder than for cancer. If a man has a localized cancer, even aggressive like Gleason 9 or 10, then open prostatectomy sounds like an absolute lifesaver. But for BPH? Maybe too drastic. I wonder though if a surgeon can cut out 40-60 cc and leave me with a smaller prostate, it might be worth it.
Going to research HoLEP. Is that the same as "GreenLight"?
james87669 MichaelVM7
Posted
derek76 james87669
Posted
The later Thulium/Holmium laser procedure I had when my prostate regrew was also no great problem but more blood as I am on Warfarin that I stopped for two days.
reg52510 derek76
Posted
I think if the symptoms are bad and the surgical outcome promises to be positive enough it makes sense to undergo whatever procedure seems appropriate to the situation. I think doctors sometimes get it wrong, however. That's why so many men have urged caution before agreeing to surgery and after making the decision, then selecting a competent doctor. Remember, 50% of the physicians out there finished in the bottom half of their class.
derek76 reg52510
Posted
Our NHS urologists seem better than your ones. However the hospital where mine was done was doing GL as a trial with four Uro's doing it. I was patient no 38 but only the eighth of the one doing it and I was confident of his ability. The same applied to two friends who had theirs done just before me under similar circumstances at two other hospitals.
I'm the only one who has needed a rebore.
We all had to travel to get it done as our local uro's were still only doing TURP.
I met one of the two original Uros doing it in the UK years later and he said that initially they thought it was an easy procedure but later realised that more care was needed.
The latest version of GL (XPS) is now the preferred option from The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to hospitals.
MichaelVM7 reg52510
Posted
Michael
MichaelVM7 derek76
Posted
Does GL mean Green Light? Are you aware of any studies that report how long it takes for the prostate to regrow? For example, does TURP have to be redone in 5, 10, 15 years, HoLEP in 5, Green Light in ____ years, etc., etc.?
Wouldn't the time a given procedure can buy you factor into the decision process (along w/ complications such as ED, incontinence risks)? A man in his late 50s might make a different choice than a man in his late 70s.
Also, are there certain procedures that if done and fail rule out other options down the road?
Thanks,
Michael
derek76 MichaelVM7
Posted
I had my Green Light PVP in June 2004 on my 75 gram prostate. When I had the Thulium/Holmium laser one in 2013 my prostate was 135 grams.
Two friends who also had the procedure in 2004 have not needed a second one.. yet.
Total surgical removal is the only way not to need it done again but what life would tou have after that?
If Icould turn the clock back the best option now seems to be PAE.