Da Vinci for Turp??
Posted , 14 users are following.
I just had a cystocopy and it seems like I am headed for a TURP.
My local urologist seems quite competent but I am wondering if I would do better with a large medical center perhaps equipped with robotic surgery like Da Vinci.
Advice will be greatly appreciated.
0 likes, 94 replies
lester90053 jjjj57989
Posted
james-98 jjjj57989
Posted
Argentina have had Da Vinci (cirugía robótica) since 2008. They do prostate and bladder surgery. For more information you should call Dr. Oscar H. Damia. He is a highly regarded urologist, chief of urology and general coordinator of the Robotic Unit (Da Vinci) of Hospital Italiano. The hospital address is Juan D. Peron 4190, C1181ACH Buenos Aires, Argentina. The phone number is 54 11 4959-0200.
Good luck!
James
jjjj57989
Posted
Along with the other research I've done, it seems like Urolift is the only treatment that has pretty much only positive reviews.
But its new and I havent seen long term results.
I've seen it called a 'temporary' fix, and also seen questions raised about attaching a foreign body to the prostate ie: once men have had them for awhile will scarring or rejection problems occur?
bill80656 jjjj57989
Posted
TURP was terrible for me both during and after the surgery, with terrible results.
The PAE was a breeze and has worked great for me.
cartoonman jjjj57989
Posted
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
kenneth1955 bill80656
Posted
jjjj57989 kenneth1955
Posted
What do you mean you 'don't pee on demand'?
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
bill80656 kenneth1955
Posted
No he did not talk me into it. And he did not talk to me about the possible side effects. And he did absolutely no follow up on me, and he also did not prescribe any of the usual medications given after the procedure. In the end the "treatment" was poor and I had this done in Boston at Brighams and Womens Hospital. Suppose to be one of the best right?
As I said before here. It didn't work for me and it was a terrible experience. I was peeing razor blades for nearly 3 months afterwards.
When I called him 16 months later and told him that it didn't help he said he would do it again for me.
At that point I had just heard about the PAE and so I asked him if he could do that. He said no so I went elswhere. Now I can pee almost normally.
kenneth1955 bill80656
Posted
jjjj57989
Posted
cartoonman jjjj57989
Posted
jjjj57989
Posted
As you predicted he stuck to TURP as being the only good solutions.
His reason was that while my prostate was 'a little large' the real problem is that the neck of my bladder is to tight and I need a turp to open it.
I've searched for information on bladder necks but found zero.
So I'm stumped.
I can consult with a PAE speciatlist nearby for second opinion.
Has anyone encounterred this situation?
cartoonman jjjj57989
Posted
Motoman jjjj57989
Posted
Not everyone is a candidate for PAE, I wasn't.
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
kenneth1955 Motoman
Posted
jjjj57989 kenneth1955
Posted
I couldnt find any reference to 'celis' did you mean 'cialis'?
Can I take that daily or a permanent basis?
Yeah, he said retro was a piece of cake.
cartoonman kenneth1955
Posted
Btw, it's one of the true advantages of Urolift: it is the ONLY option that is completely reversible, if need be.
jjjj57989 Motoman
Posted
Motoman kenneth1955
Posted
I do a lot of outdoors stuff with other people around. You ever done cathing with people standing around? It sucks, and is pretty embarrassing. So retro once in a while, (it's not like most are still getting it daily...) beats having to carry a cath on my activities, and whether I can sneak away or have to actually use the cath around other people.
I would do TURP if I knew it would eliminate the catheters...
Motoman jjjj57989
Posted
cartoonman Motoman
Posted
When I forst had to use catheters (My prostate had totally closed off the urethra), I had just begun leading the renovation of an old derelict building to be my wife's new church (She's a minister.). I became quite adapt at using those catheters around all those big tough guys! :-) I carried the softer hydrophilic ones with the little sacks that were fun to burst, but it was a hassle. I switched to Speedicaths and they are terrific! The Speedicaths slip nicely down or up the jeans (or pants), and then drop securely into the socks. I always carried extra alcohol pads, as they sometimes opened to be dry.
I even developed a way that I could tend to the whole procedure without having to thoroughly wash my hands! Not recommended, but a nifty way to do it, if the situation doesn't allow for it. Humans are adaptive animals! If you might need this method, provate message me and I'll share. Warning! Graphic language! :-D
Motoman cartoonman
Posted
cartoonman Motoman
Posted
And by the by and not that it matters, those may have been wasps (e.g., yellow jackets), ehich are my nature humorless and nasty, rather than bees. Although either will likely sting if you're standing on their nest! :-D
Btw, those "pocket caths" are available here in the States; at least, I've been sent samples a couple of times. But I find the regular model to be easier to haul around and use...
kenneth1955 jjjj57989
Posted
kenneth1955 cartoonman
Posted
kenneth1955 Motoman
Posted
vic59 Motoman
Posted
I am 58 and have been on Tamsulosin and Finasteride for a year with all negative side effects, during last month. I declined TURP last week and The good notice is I'm now candidate for Urolift. ....but..... from my pocket.
iTind seems as good as Urolift
Do you know the cost for the iTind procedure ? where ?
Thanks
P.S. I aplied for iTind Pivotal Study in course right now, but i have
not answer ...yet !?
cartoonman kenneth1955
Posted
Interestingly, a year later, he was in training to do the Urolift---which I scheduled elsewhere... with someone with experience...
kenneth1955 cartoonman
Posted
Motoman vic59
Posted
I can message you where I am having it done. I don't know if it is allowed to post on here.
I had inquired about the clinical trial, but it was in New York, and they wanted you to come back on a regular basis for follow up.i live too far away for that to be practical, plus they couldn't guarantee you would actually get the device and not a placebo.
The ITind is not totally non invasive. It actually cuts into the prostate, there is some bleeding, etc.
i didn't really look into the Urolift. I didn't like the idea of parts being left inside me, but it seems like good results.
cartoonman Motoman
Posted
Btw, re Urolift and "parts left inside me,"I understand. And actually, the metal implants are so tiny, they don't even set off the TSA scanners! :-)
kenneth1955 Motoman
Posted
vic59 Motoman
Posted
I would like to know some more about the invasive part of iTind as well as the clinic info to try something for my. To decide between iTind and Urolift or another as you know is very important for us. Information and Advises are critical. I post a private message to you. Thank you very much for your answer. Vic