Deciding to refuse cardiac catheterization.
Posted , 9 users are following.
After doing the best I can to ferret out the risks vs benefits of cardiac catheterization. 92% of my brain says, "No." That niggling 8% is a real pain.
I am female. I am over 60. I have not had a myocardial infarction, (that they're telling me about anyway). I have some stress wall hypertrophy, but that's pretty much it. If I could get the physicians/cardiologists, to give me better evidence of need for such an invasive procedure, I might consider it...however...
I know me. Just having the procedure would be psychologically, and, therefore, physically, ruinous. I think I understand - but who can understand this really - that choosing not to have the catheterization, and whatever may happen as a result, means I might sign out quite unexpected. But is this a better way to live? I think so.
I have not felt "well" for at 7 years. (I'll spare you the ailments). However, I don't get colds, flu (no vaccinations)...I don't have hypertension. I'm told I have angina, but I am convinced that the post-meal sensations I get are due to gastric/diaphragm...more on that order of things. I don't have frank chest "pain."
I'm figuring that it will be a complete craps shoot to refuse the catheterization, but I am 100% certain, that there is a better chance of me surviving an invasive procedure if I don't die before I have it, then lending myself to what looks like a never-ending routine of invasive procedures.
What I'm currently hoping for, but have been unable to get, is a cardiologist who will agree to fully monitor me; one who truly understands the various medications available and who would find one that is best suited for this particular body, and who considers cardiac catheterization, et al, a last resort, rather than a first. (Nice fantasy).
So far, I've had the general practitioner I see, attempt to scare the hell out of me without telling me on what evidence he was doing so. (I would change to another GP if there was another one around). That kind of tactic is not only useless, but demoralizing. When it comes to "heart," demoralization can, without a doubt, lead to "heart trouble."
It's all a quandry.
3 likes, 46 replies
derek76 Quandryite
Posted
Guest derek76
Posted
derek76 Guest
Posted
I complained about my last angiogram that took 50 minutes. He kept on asking for other sizes of catheters and at one point asked the nurse if she would try to get it round an awkward corner. No way! she said. At that point he gave up saying the rest was all right so that probably is.
After I complained to the head of cardiology he said it was part of X's learning curve.
Quandryite derek76
Posted
derek76 Quandryite
Posted
I must have had over 400 X-Rays in my lifetime and at 80 do not yet glow in the dark.
Guest derek76
Posted
derek76 Guest
Posted
I don't expect that having signed the consent form that you got any compensation.
Quandryite Guest
Posted
Guest derek76
Posted
Guest Quandryite
Posted
derek76 Guest
Posted
With my first one I did not even realise that he had actually started. I felt the pushing at my groin then he turned away fiddling with his monitor that was turned away from me. After a minute or so I inquired when he was going to start.
Start? he said, I'm watching the action replay now and turned the monitor towards me.
Guest derek76
Posted
Quandryite Guest
Posted
Quandryite Guest
Posted
I keep being told that one type is as good as another. So much for the tomes of published studies on beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensins, etc., etc., etc. It's as if those studies, which clearly have indications that should prompt prescribing one type over another, and even within the various subgroups, were someone's fantastic invention.
It doesn't look promising that I'll get the right pharmaceutical regimen. Why aren't there pharmacologic cardiologists anyway?
derek76 Quandryite
Posted
I was told that I had angina in 2003 after having cardiac like chest pains and being monitored in hospital for four days that did not show anything but a stress ECG showed that my heart was not getting enough oxygen so they said angina. I did not agree nor did my then GP.
Seven years later I had your post meal chest pains and when my BP was checked it was 210/110, I had an ECG and echocardiogram and later when my BP had dropped with medication I was again told that I had angina after a stress ECG, My then GP and I both thought otherwise.
After another failed stress ECG the next year I had an angiogram that showed my arteries to be clear, Failed stress ECG's? false positives they said.
In 2011 I was diagnosed with aortic stenosis and had another angiogram after a stress echocardiogram indicated two narrowed arteries. Again the arteries were found to be clear but I think it was worthwhile having them done.
derek76
Posted
leslie32189 derek76
Posted
i heard that a few times my self oh sorry we do not have one a stent like the one the cardiologist asked for, so im confuswd with this procedure too
did not think it happened
Quandryite derek76
Posted