Denosumab problems
Posted , 13 users are following.
Discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) can lead to vertebral fracture, apparently not related to the underlying osteoporosis, but to the development of microcracks in the bones from denosumab. Advice is to replace denosumab, not go cold turkey off the med. Sounds like this drug is ripe for lawsuits, and perhaps should be discontinued.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27732330
2 likes, 72 replies
stefania3 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga stefania3
Posted
I believe you need to see your doctor, after reading about this on the internet, there's more info than just the item I posted. You probably should be given a DXA scan and go from there. I doubt if everyone has the same reaction, but it certainly seems a possibility everyone on Prolia needs to be aware of. It's relatively new information, so a lot of people come off Prolia once their bone density is deemed satisfactory, and that appears to be putting them at risk. I've been saying all along that even people on drugs should be doing everything they can to improve their bone density naturally, and it would be really interesting to know if this has a protective effect or not.
stefania3 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga stefania3
Posted
Can you add Vitamin K2 to your supplements, not K1, as most of us are deficient in it, and it's the vitamin which, along with magnesium, sends the calcium into the bones?
stefania3 Anhaga
Posted
Thanks, I'll put that on my list to buy tomorrow!
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
I knew not to use Prolia and that it was even worse than AA or others.
Thank you for this research Anhaga. My sister only tolerated it for one six month dose and she could not wait for the time to be up. Hopefully, one dose will not be too bad. Before that, she had taken AA for about a year and was very unwell. She has something wrong with oesophageas and should never have even been put on AA.
Anhaga kathleen65757
Posted
I had heard that denosumab actually poisons the osteoclasts, doesn't just retard their action as AA et co do. Was shocked to learn of this other problem. Why oh why are the drug companies allowed to use a vulnerable aging population as 1) cash cows and b) guinea pigs?
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
Doctors are just starting to catch up now on research that their patients have been doing. My GP admitted to me that she does not have the time to research sufficiently to know about everything and I have been able to tell her some information that she was unaware of, and she appreciated that.
Obviously, patients are refusing the drugs for osteoporosis because my new GP never blinked when I said I would not consider Prolia.
barbara98742 Anhaga
Posted
alison28608 barbara98742
Posted
Juno-Irl-Dub Anhaga
Posted
Hi Anhaga, thank you for reporting on this published paper on Prolia and it's worrying reports of a significant number of vertebral fractures occurring in a specific study group.
I remember when I was diagnosed with severe osteoporosis (OP) in 2013 that Prolia was the newest medication
(I was prescribed Forteo) and there seemed to be no concensus among the medics as to how long this treatment should last - some suggested 5 years for lower risk patients and 10 years for those at high risk, others suggested it could be used indefinitely. . . . I don't know if this advice still holds or if the manufacturer now issues different precautions.
I had a quick look at the abstract of the paper you mentioned and a couple of observations seem relevant.
First, as Alison has already commented, the patients studied here were a different cohort to the typical patient with OP who is prescribed Prolia - these were patients who were recovering from cancer and were therefore being treated for the effect a chemotherapy regime can have on bones (OP) and also, their Prolia dosage would have been higher than normal. Next, the study mentioned 9 patients who had repeated fractures which happened rapidly (9 - 16 months) after their last Prolia injection. What percentage was that of the total number of patients involved in the study - ie. are we talking about 10% of the patients studied or 20% or 50% or 90% ???
Obviously this shows that more research is needed as to how to treat patients after their Prolia medication is stopped. It may be that they may need to move to an alternative therapy at this point. Perhaps we are looking here at a very new drug which is really effective in reducing fractures while in use but because of it's short time on the market the issue of the ' after use' period has not been investigated. I know that, with Forteo, it is known that to consolidate any increased bone density gained while on the drug, you are strongly advised to continue bisphosphonate therapy for a few years after stopping it.
I briefly had a look at when the FDA approved some of the OP drugs that we are familiar with - some of you may be interested in this:
PROLIA - approved in 2011
RECLAST - approved in 2007
ACTONEL - approved in 2002
FORTEO - approved in 2002
FOSAMAX - approved in 1995.
Kind regards, J
Anhaga Juno-Irl-Dub
Posted
Anhaga
Posted
http://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/762.3
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
sandra30136 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga sandra30136
Posted
I am sure the doctors have been coming up with a bridging treatment. I think there are also organizations in most countries which offer counselling and information over a helpline, so you can get some advice and reassurance by contacting the one in your country. I hear really good things about the organization in the UK, although sometimes apparently you have to try more than once to get the person who is right for you! It is encouraging to me that more attention is being paid to the fact that women in particular get treatments which may do them harm because of incomplete research, or in some cases (probably not with Prolia) lack of full disclosure regarding possible outcomes. That doesn't help those of us already on a rocky path, however. Please get in touch with a doctor or organization who can give you good advice and reassurance. ?