Does osteoporosis cause pain?
Posted , 12 users are following.
My doctor said my back pains are not from the osteoporosis. She said after one shatters or breaks their bone, then it will really hurt.
I saw on a post someone said osteoporosis is painful. What does that mean?
And if they only test a few areas with Dexa scan, should one get a scan of the rest of the spine or is it assumed it's all the way up?
My Physical Therapist asked where my osteo is so he knows I guess to avoid certain things???? Before I got scan another therapist popped my back and neck, so I'm thinking he shouldn't do that, yikes.
2 likes, 70 replies
paulduffy36 LayneTX
Posted
kathleen65757 paulduffy36
Posted
shaq26875 paulduffy36
Posted
paulduffy36 shaq26875
Posted
paulduffy36 kathleen65757
Posted
Aristotle13 paulduffy36
Posted
Aristotle13
Posted
paulduffy36 Aristotle13
Posted
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
Don't forget the minus sign before the number!
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
I'm quite well educated and I haven't a clue what you are talking about. Please be kind to the innumerate amongst us!
constance.de Aristotle13
Posted
Hi Aristotle. You seem to know quite a lot about OP but I don't understand why I was told by rheumy and doctor that OP doesn't 'hurt' !! Can you explain?
Quite a laugh really, both drs said "don't fall ". Sad! I love throwing myself all over the place!😏😏
Aristotle13 constance.de
Posted
Hello Conance.de
Most of my knowledge comes from analyzing the work of others and applying my version of common sense. In the case of pain and ostoporosis, it is generally accepted that the loss of bone density that is caused by osteoporosis, on its own does not cause pain but when the bone begins to crumble and fracture then the pain nerves become involved, the amount of pain being related to the density of the pain nerves and the amount of inflammation at the site of the affliction. Acute inflammation is your body's short-term response to injury or infection. Blood vessels swell, releasing fluids and white blood cells into the affected area. This is the source of the swelling, heat, redness and pain that are the classic signs and symptoms of inflammation
This is what I have deduced from my quite extensive reading although most of the authors skirt around the pain subject because of the arthritic implications. The description above is actually a very short form of what happens which is quite involved and would require many pages to describe in detail.
Hope that this helps explain the no-pain osteoporosis affliction which can be extremely painful once fractures, even micro-fractures, are evident.
Aristotle13
Posted
constance.de Aristotle13
Posted
Regards fr Constance
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Sorry Anhaga, that's the mathematician in me coming out. Absolute values don't have a sign or are assumed to be positive. Magnitude is likewise just the level of an absolute number.
Unfortunately, negative numbers cause many problems for those who are not familiar with them. It never occured to me that words like absolute and magnitude would do the same. There are descriptions on search engines.
Hope that all is well with you.
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
If you are discussing a positive number then the absolute magnitude is the same as the real number. If you are discussing the number line then you should use real numbers or make it clear that you are not, if that is the case.
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
I had never perceived the minus sign indicates an unreal number. To me it just helpfully designates the amount one is below an optimum bone density. More like the temperature gauge. I certainly have no trouble understanding what -10 or -15 means, as opposed to 10 or 15. All I need is to know whether it's F or C.
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Quite so but when it comes to standard deviations, most people in our age group don't have a clue but will understand magnitudes. This is factual in the world of mathematics where there are such things as imaginary numbers and complex numbers and etc, etc.
The minus sign doesn't indicate an unreal number and not necessarily a real number. although most of the time it is real. The absolute magnitude of any real number is a member of the domain of real positive numbers and zero.
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
Never mind. I still count on my fingers! But I do find it more confusing to not use the minus sign in this context, just as I would if we dropped the minus sign when referring to temperature. Don't understand how your method can be less confusing.
So if a bone density is 2, (not your -2 converted but a real 2 above zero) how do you differentiate that number from the 2 you are now using instead of -2. What number does that 2 above zero become?
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
Anhaga
Posted
http://www.niams.nih.gov/health_info/bone/bone_health/bone_mass_measure.asp
Anhaga
Posted
constance.de Anhaga
Posted
Oh Anhaga, surely you didn't take Aristotle's comment seriously?! It is lovely to have a little joke with one-another. Between you you have kept me amused all afternoon. I didn't understand half of what you were saying, but I still enjoyed it😀
Anhaga constance.de
Posted
I did, actually. I kept asking a question which he didn't answer (what happens to the plus numbers when the minus numbers lose their minus sign?). Obviously he thinks I'm too thick to be bothered with! I really do have a problem with mathematics. In a later age it might have been deemed a learning disability. In my case they just let me get on with words and pictures and the numbers slid away. Thank goodness uni accepted my high school cred in math or I might still be in first year!
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Unfortunately I didn't have any plans beyond the bit that I was working on. With genuinely positive figures I should have to stipulate that the usual figures are negative but that this particular figure is positive. In this case the mathematical notation would let me down.
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga, I have too much respect for you to mock you beyond a little teasing. I don't really think that you are ignorant but I sometimes find that what is almost second nature to me because of my background, leads me into areas where I am uncertain what is really required.
In this case, I unwittingly used terms which I hadn't realised were uncommon and I unreservedly appologise for any feelings of mockery that I may have caused. You are a trusted friend and I would never deliberately cause you any angst. I really wasn't criticising you and had no reason to suspect that you weren't teasing me.
Regards
Aristotle
Anhaga Aristotle13
Posted
Quite possibly the terms are common and understood by most people. Not moi. Like I said, I count on my fingers. I visualize pictures when I hear or see numbers. That being said, I know that mathematics may be the nearest we can get to absolute truth.
Aristotle13 Anhaga
Posted
But you were quite correct to query what happened when you got to positive numbers. In the notation I was using, there is no answer beyond spelling out the detail. So really to be absolutely correct, I should either have used the negative prefix or else should have specified a reduced domain within which I would have had to exclude the positive valued T-scores which could have been even more confusing. It's actually easier to use the negative sign. I shall remember that in the future.
kathleen65757 Aristotle13
Posted
constance.de Anhaga
Posted
You're like me - numbers terrify me! At school I learnt that 2 + 2 = 4, now I'm not so sure?😀
kathleen65757 Aristotle13
Posted
I play with numbers, dividing and multiplying, and know my times tables off perfectly.
Mathematics is far more complex and I never excelled there because my brain is on the side of language.
Funnily enough I was quite good at logic which is different again and more about making sense of words and terms. That was when there was a senior subject called Logic.
One of our daughters had encephalitis at about age eight and lost all language skills but her mathematics side of the brain was sharpened and she has been very clever with Maths helping another daughter with her PhD when it required maths.
An interesting topic unleashed lol!
shaq26875 kathleen65757
Posted
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy ...What is the meaning to Life ? Was it 4.5 ..Cant remember
shaq26875
Posted
sorry should have said "What is the meaning of Life ?" ( I think )
Aristotle13 shaq26875
Posted
It was probably 'what is the answer to everything?' and the answer, 42, but no-one knows the question!
Anhaga shaq26875
Posted
Anhaga
Posted
Anhaga shaq26875
Posted
Anhaga kathleen65757
Posted
The only time I remember becoming interested in math was in my final year when we did something called co-ordinate geometry. Mostly my memory of math is arithmetic in the early grades when the teacher kindly drew a line down the pages and pages of sums so that I only had to do one or two in each row, and I still only got about 2/3 through the book,even while my classmates finished everything. I was unable to master the times tables, except times 5 of course.
Of course my exercise books were full of drawings and doodles, to chagrin of teachers. And I used to take the new reader home the first day of class and read the whole thing that evening.
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
Reading is at the heart of everything even Maths as you cannot solve a problem if you cannot understand the question.
I love music but cannot play an instrument.
I was only thinking today how terrible it would be if I could not read.
Anhaga kathleen65757
Posted
kathleen65757 Anhaga
Posted
I like watching movies as well. I read online a lot as well.
My iPad is my friend.
shaq26875 Aristotle13
Posted
Couldnt even remember that I put it all down to 'getting on a bit'