Elevated PSA
Posted , 12 users are following.
I am a 75 years old. My PSA last year was 4.03 this year it has elevated to 5.83. This has me stressed and worried. My urologist has recommend I have a biopsy. I have been reading and go ogling about prostate cancer and biopsies. The more I read and learn,the more confused I get. I am 50- to get a biopsy and 50 not to get one. Taking my life span in consideration I could die of something else if I did have the cancer. This is what I have been finding out through my research. I am presently taking Flomax to help my frequent urination. I Have also learned that they are risks involved with the biopsy. I am going nuts thinking about my elevated PSA result. Any advice coming my way, would be appreciated.
2 likes, 114 replies
dieter80046 Roger2Dodger
Posted
I also learnt something from the discussion (Craig & Stewart). Didn't know what an ultrasound biopsy was; and still don't know, whether this is what I had. It sounds to me though, that the ultrasound pinpoints the areas in the prostate that should be sampled.
Look forward to hearing what the outcome of your biopsy was and what treatment your doctor(s) recommend, if any. Until then, don't stress too much. Most men our age, I'm told, either have or will develop PC, so in a way we must be normal.
Roger2Dodger dieter80046
Posted
Yes, you have it right about the ultrasound biopsy. My Doctor scheduled an appointment for April 12, I assume this will be the time I get my results. I am sure it does not take that long to get a biopsy back, so I am going to try to get a result sooner than April 12. I will let you know the results. I just hope my results will let me go Active surveillance. May I ask your results of your biopsy and treatment you had, if any. your psa score before biopsy..etc.
Thanks,
Roger
dieter80046 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Ten samples (called cores) were taken from the left hand side of the prostate, 10-15mm long, ten from the right, 15-20mm long.
MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION: "Histological examination of both specimens (ie left and right) confirms the presence of cores of fibromuscular stroma. The cores show extensive involvement by an infiltrating poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Five of the ten cores from the left side and all ten of the cores from the right side show involvement by the tumour. The tumour is composed of infiltrating malignant cells arranged singly. The cells are seen infiltrating between fibromuscular stroma indicating muscle cutting. The cells have enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli. In areas, occasional gland formations are noted. These are seen infiltrating in fused ragged masses. Perineural infiltration is noted and some vascular channel invasion is identified. There is no accompanying prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia."
I'm sure you'll agree, this is too much for the layman like you and me! Here then are the conclusions, as I understand them:
5 of the 10 left cores were malignant, all ten of the right cores were, so all in all 15 of the 20 cores or samples. The tumour volume as a percentage of the prostate volume was 43%. The Gleason score was determined as follows: Primary pattern: 5, Secondary pattern: 4, Tertiary pattern: N/A. Combined score: 9 (5+4). Prognostic grade group V.
"Tumour necrosis" absent.
Perineural infiltration: present.
Angio-lymphatic channel invasion: present.
Seminal vesicles: absent.
PIN: Absent."
Etc, etc.
The long and short of it is that the prostate was quite full of cancer (more than 40% of the enlarged volume) and quite aggressive with a Gleason of 9. The urologist wanted to treat it by starting immediately with hormonal (testosterone reducing) therapy (pills in my case, which I did start taking). Quite soo, he would have wanted to do brachytherapy (radioactive pellets imbedded into the prostate) together with a radiation oncologist. I consulted the radiation oncologist and two other urologists and then opted for the radical prostatectomy instead by means of robotic surgery on a DaVinci machine.
Let me know your results, when you get them.
Roger2Dodger dieter80046
Posted
So sorry you couldn't have got a more favorable score. Your next step is to deal with it and get well. Hope all goes well with the procedure. Yes, I certainly will share my results. It pains me to have to wait so long to get them.
Take Care
Roger
craig84609 dieter80046
Posted
stewarta dieter80046
Posted
dieter80046 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Roger2Dodger
Posted
stewarta Roger2Dodger
Posted
charles61038 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Don't panic. A Gleason score of 6 or 7 is not too bad. The range from 2 to 10, so your score is in the middle. Look at a website called my prostate cancer coach dot org. There is some good information there. Also research your treatment options. You may want to take the active survailence that many men take... where you keep an eye on things. Or you can decided on a treatment and be done with it. I chose Brachytherapy as a one time treatment with few side effects. And everything still works that way it should. My gleason score was 6. If I were you, I would consider external beam radiation, Cyberknife or Brachytherapy. They all have side effects, but do your research and see which has he least side effects. Also discuss with your urologist and your radiation oncologist. If your general health is good, you might consider treatment options. The pathologist should have also identified the type of cancer cells. I understand acenocarcinoma is a slow growing kind. If that is what you have, you have time to consider your options. My urologist and radiation oncologist both told me that with low risk prostate cancer, it is very treatable and curable.
Good luck to you... and do some research. There is a lot of information to read through.
Charles
craig84609 charles61038
Posted
Roger2Dodger charles61038
Posted
charles61038 Roger2Dodger
Posted
The best of luck to you,
Charles
Roger2Dodger charles61038
Posted
Roger
craig84609 Roger2Dodger
Posted
stewarta charles61038
Posted
I didn't like the answers I got to such questions as the following for any radiation therapy:
* What do I do if PSA or other tests show the PCa is advancing/ becoming more aggressive? Can I then have a Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy?
* How long after radiation therapy will I know if my PSA is close to zero?
* How do you check to see if the PCa is localised, and not in the lymph nodes?
There are of course many other questions to which one needs answers.