For your views pls
Posted , 7 users are following.
Hi I'm 45 yrs -Male. Having symptoms of SVT for the last 9 years but could never be diagnosed. Had multiple episodes lasted from 2 sec to 15 min but never showed up in any of the ECGs or halter monitor tests. Luckily last week when I was consulting a cardiologist for an expert advise, I had an episode in front of him. Smartly he did an ECG Which clearly showed that it is SVT. My heartbeat was 144. It came for to 94 in 15 mts and got to normal soon. I learned that I get this episodes when I am physically, emotionally or mentally stressed. Since I am much worried about it, the doctor suggested an ablation which I am planning to get it done in July when I visit my native in India. Otherwise I don't have any heart related issues as revealed in the echo test. However, since I have a strong family history of angina and also since I am 45 yrs now, the doctor suggested an angiogram too to be done along with ablation. Kindly share your opinions 1. Is ablation successful so that I can have a normal life with exercises and 2. Is angiogram is really required.... Thank you
0 likes, 39 replies
ciaran33745 Daashin
Posted
I have never had an angiogram so cannot comment on that.
Good luck
Daashin ciaran33745
Posted
poppy08416 Daashin
Posted
It used to be that SVT was treated with ablation only when the symptoms were severely imposing on someone's life. Now it's become first line treatment for anyone who's had even one small episode. The procedure is not without risk. SVT has almost no risk. Consider if you really require it. (BTW 2 second palpiations are probably ectopic beats which are very normal).
Emis Moderator comment: I have removed the link(s) directing to site(s) unsuitable for inclusion in the forums. If users want this information please use the Private Message service to request the details.
http://patient.uservoice.com/knowledgebase/articles/398331-private-messages
Daashin poppy08416
Posted
ciaran33745 poppy08416
Posted
I found SVT a very debilitating and scary condition. Fear of it and dealing with episodes dominated my life to a very unhealthy degree prior to having the ablation that eliminated it.
I don't think it is generally accurate to say that an ablation is now the first course of treatment because suitability tests must first be carried out. There have been many comments here from those regretting they were not found suitable for the procedure.
One of the greatests regrets of my life is that it took a combination of severe SVT and chemo for the cardio specialists to decide that I should have an ablation (also my fault for not finding out enough about SVT treatments sooner).
Its very important that Daashin finds cardio specialists he trusts, and is aware of the what are really low risks nowadays, but my guideance would be to go ahead with an ablation if the medics he trusts say it has a good chance of success.
All the best
Daashin ciaran33745
Posted
Keeping the finger crossed for the procedure and thank you for everyone's support.
poppy08416 ciaran33745
Posted
If anxiety is debilitating people then treat the anxiety! Letting someone go poking around in your heart with a laser to treat a non-dangerous condition should be very carefully considered. As I said, it's not without risk.
ciaran33745 poppy08416
Posted
In my case my SVT went so mad because of chemo (or the IV steroids that came with it) that the cancer people said the chemo couldn't continue unless the cardio people sorted out my heart first. So I had an ablation within a couple of days.
Perhaps the ablation appears such a minor procedure because of all the other stuff that was going on, but all I know is that it transformed my life from one of pretty constant fear and frequent trips to the A&E to one where I can get on with normal things like most other people. It really does feel like I was released from a prison of some kind.
Like I said earlier, I really regret not being knowledgeable and confident enough to insist on having an ablation years earlier. I mightn't then have missed out on as much with my kids, and used unhealthy props to cope with the anxiety I got from being prone to SVT. I would definitely take several times the risk to benefit from an ablation because to me quality of life is much more important than longevity.
You seem less anxious and delilitated by SVT than I was so I suppose trying to eliminate it through an ablation wouldn't be as high a priority. I really do wish you well.
gene91169 Daashin
Posted
Daashin gene91169
Posted
brandy2222 Daashin
Posted
Fast forward to 45 years and the attacks starting lasting 30 - 45 minutes but I was never able to get an EKG when it happened. My last attack at age 47 yrs, prior to ablation, never self reverted and my heart rate was 248 when I reached the Emergency Room.
So consider that it may get worse as time goes on without an ablation. I think the last attack changed my body mechanism somehow because since then my heart rate rises rapidly with moderate exercise.
I've had multiple tests and they all show the same thing. The heart rate rises to 175 within just a few minutes of commencing exercise. It has never exceeded 175 but it can be debilitating to have it rise so fast. I used to have difficulty getting my heart rate above 125 even with hard, sustained exercise lasting an hour or longer prior to the last severe attack.
On a normal day something as simple as washing dishes or cooking can send my heart rate to 125. Now the high heart rate is definitely not SVT. EKGs and Stress tests taken have show my heart rhythm is completely normal but just high. My blood pressure remains low to normal when the heart rate is elevated.
I personally wish I had had an ablation long before it became severe. I can still exercise but per the electrophysiologist have to focus more on strengthening exercises than on aerobic exercises. I love speed walking and it is distressing that I can't walk or run as fast as I was previously able to.
So my input would be to go ahead and do the ablation. Frequent episodes of SVT can induce anxiety about future attacks and it could get worse over time.
Daashin brandy2222
Posted
Take care.
Dakine3 Daashin
Posted
poppy08416 brandy2222
Posted
If leaving an ablation caused the problems you are having then we'd all be advised to have one ASAP before any more damage was caused. So although I'm sorry you are having problems, please don't use your situation as a cautionary tale for not getting an ablation done because it's simply not the case.
I do have severe SVT and am in hospital every few weeks with a heart rate above 200 bpm. I've been given as much time as I want to think about an ablation and I'm well aware of the risks and I haven't agreed to it yet. I've had episodes longer than 9 hours and still not dead/no damage. My heart is not damaged in any way by SVT and I've been managing it for 30 years. Your symptoms are probably fitness and age-related.
I'm also a qualified Nurse so I'm very aware of how unserious SVT is. It's way more often people's anxiety over the symptoms that causes the issues than the issue itself.
brandy2222 poppy08416
Posted
Actually my electrophysiologist suggested it could be Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia (IST). Since I could exercise freely prior to the last major SVT and had issues with rapidly rising heart rate beginning immediately after that attack he agreed that my body may be responding inappropriately to adrenaline.
Perhaps with your medical training you may have an alternate explanation for why I experienced such a dramatic change in the way my body responds to adrenaline post the the last major SVT. There are many people with SVT who also have IST. The mechanism that causes IST is unknown at this time. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
poppy08416 brandy2222
Posted
I can't explain why you have other cardiac issues but either can you so to blame it on an SVT episode is probably not accurate and may incorrectly influence someone else towards having an ablation.
poppy08416 brandy2222
Posted
brandy2222 poppy08416
Posted
sarah06516 poppy08416
Posted
poppy08416 sarah06516
Posted
I just had a long discussion with my cardiologist regarding this and nope, still not a risky condition if I use his opinion to confirm what I've already said.
sarah06516 poppy08416
Posted
brandy2222 sarah06516
Posted
I agree there absolutely is a risk of passing out which is why I was told not to drive myself to the Emergency Room during an attack. I checked the stats for syncope on the US National Institute of Health website and it states "Syncope occurs in up to 20% of patients with supraventricular tachycardias and is suggestive of rapid and dangerous arrhythmias." so the incidence is not insignificant.
Good luck with your procedure. I know I personally gained some peace of mind with mine and I hope you do as well.
poppy08416 sarah06516
Posted
"Loss of consciousness (also known as syncope) during SVT is a rare occurrence. Although such symptoms may raise concern, in general, SVT is not a serious or life-threatening condition "
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/106/25/e206.full
I didn't say breathlessness would resolve when you laid down - I said the feeling that you might pass out will resolve. Because the sensation happens due to lack of oxygen to the brain so laying down means it no longer has to be pumped uphill to your head. Simple.
The risk of ending up with a pacemaker in many cases is 1:200 after ablation. Low risk? Well that depends on what it's stacked against.
I'm not telling you not to get an ablation. In fact I didn't tell anyone here to do or not do anything. My comments were not initially directed at you in any way. However it's a shame that you see having SVT episodes as "not living" and that you've lost 20 years of your life over something that happens every now and again. I guess it's all about perception.
poppy08416 brandy2222
Posted
It's not the same as bog standard, common SVT which has a very low risk of syncope.
It's important to know what you're actually referring to.
sarah06516 brandy2222
Posted
I can tell you 100% that my kids do not get the best of me because of this condition and that's not good enough. I want to be able to walk them to the park without the fear of going into SVT. Not to mention the constant fatigue! Im terrified of the procedure especially since my extra pathway is on the left side but fingers crossed it gives me a life free of SVT which is something I've never experience before! And my kids will then get the mother they deserve!
brandy2222 sarah06516
Posted
poppy08416 sarah06516
Posted
SVT doesn't cause constant fatigue. Unless there is another cardiac condition the heart function is completely normal unless actively in arrhythmia. So if you have constant fatigue thay may need to be investigated.
sarah06516 brandy2222
Posted
It sure is debilitating.. Lol i see im not the only one who researches the closest hospital when going on holidays! I have a trip booked to Fiji in August so i'm really hoping i get in and done before then - i can only imagine what the hospitals are like over there!
good to see you're enjoying your life! lets hope i can do the same soon!
Thanks for your postive replies!
sarah06516 poppy08416
Posted
And i beg to differ on the fatigue issue. First of all, I am on medication so that in itself is causing fatigue but one of the first things my cardiologist told me when I was first diagnosed is that I will likely feel more tired than most people. I have read a lot of forums where people have mentioned this before too.
Once again everyone is different and just because u don't have a particular symptom does not mean it doesn't happen to others. Please understand that u are NOT a cardiologist and u do NOT know everything about this condition. I'm not a newbie I've been dealing this this for many years and seen many cardiologists so I do take their word over yours.
poppy08416 sarah06516
Posted
People are also scared of ectopics - debilitated, refuse to exercise, can't leave the house etc etc. Ectopics are harmless and not particularly distressing, yet people get so worked up about them. So I don't equate the level of anxiety with the level of discomfort because when it comes to cardiac issues people seem to throw all their Cardiologists reassurance out the window, and label themselves as unwell when they really aren't. It's all about perception I guess.
I don't like the episodes either but I take them as they come, stick around at home for a few hours then head off to hospital. If you remove the anxiety factor they are totally bearable. Breathless, dizzy, chest pain, numb hands, headache etc etc I'm pretty sure my SVT is the same as everyone else's. I will get an ablation but as I responded to the first person who wrote this post (and not you) I wouldn't get one for minor episodes of self reverting SVT. I particularly wouldn't go to India for an ablation - just as you are concerned about getting even simple treatment for an episode in Fiji.
sarah06516 poppy08416
Posted
poppy08416 sarah06516
Posted
So what is the mechanism behind this fatigue that all SVT people apparently have when their heart is functioning normally the weeks/months/years between episodes?
Daashin poppy08416
Posted
sarah06516 poppy08416
Posted
It doesn't matter what I say your just going to tell me I'm wrong, because apparently u know more than my cardiologist! People like u who will belittle others with your aggressive "know it all" statements just to prove u are right are a waste of oxygen. That's the end of the convo for me. Good day to u ✌️
brandy2222 sarah06516
Posted
Poppy08416 dismissed that as me being out of shape without knowing a single thing about my daily physical activity. I'm at the point where they can't increase the dose of the medication I do tolerate well (Cardizem) because my blood pressure will become too low. My body doesn't do this in response to every single activity and heat definitely plays a factor. A hot shower can take me from 90bpm to 136bpm in minutes. There is a different type of ablation they can do on the sinus node for this condition but the effects of this ablation typically don't last longer than a few months, before the condition recurs.
There is a new medication just recently approved in the USA ( but available in Europe for a while) called Ivabradine that appears to help a lot of people with IST. I'll probably try to go this route. I've also read that increasing blood volume by increasing salt intake helps but can't really go this route thanks to kidney stones.
What I would say is if you are able to check your blood pressure / heart rate any time you're fatigued, do so. I have a heart rate monitor that clips on my finger for when I travel and also a portable regular blood pressure monitor. I have been keeping track on my activity and also what my heart rate is doing before, during and after the activity. This had been helpful to my doctor in terms of diagnosing the issue. It's also helped me because sometimes I'm fatigued because I forgot to eat, didn't sleep well or have not drunk enough water. So if my heart rate is normal then I know I need to look for another cause. Typically though it's normally just high heart rate causing the issue.
Your issue is more complex so taking some control and investigating the symptoms may help bring some answers and peace of mind. Note that medication can amplify existing issues. For example when I was prescribed Metoprolol I experienced constant PVCs, dizziness and fatigue which made driving dangerous and caused me to lose time from work. When I was prescribed Cardizem those symptoms abated but once my pharmacy switched me to a generic version of Cardizem made by another manufacturer I experienced the same debilitating symptoms. The pharmacist explained that the release mechanism was a little different between the brand and the generic medications. So now I just take the brand medication which helps a lot but it still cannot fix everything.