Hereditary craving for alcohol
Posted , 11 users are following.
During my research on hereditary emotions I have no doubt that feelings are hereditary, even phobias.
If this is fact what are we passing onto our kids if we drink in excess. Over 20 years ago there was an article in New Scientist warning that we should have our children first before using drugs or alcohol.
We have a huge responsibility not to drink in excess not just for ourselves but for the children we intend to have, if any.
1 like, 56 replies
Joanna-SMUKLtd lyn.will
Posted
Lyn,
You make an interesting point. The brain doesn't actually 'mature' until the early 20's so up until that point it can be influenced by anything. I am British, but I've often wondered if that is why the drinking age in the US is 21.
But if this is correct, doesn't it then also apply to sugar, smoking, sex (it can be an addiction too), video gaming etc etc.
As I see it, if a parent has already been passed the gene/emotion/behaviour (whatever you wish to call it0 down by their parents, then the only way to not pass that on to their child will be to not engage in any risky, potentially addictive behaviour at all. It's no good saying don't drink to excess until they have children, because if they have the gene, then any drinking will be triggering that gene/emotion and the concept of the CHOICE of not drinking to excess is just not an achievable thing.
Fongool Joanna-SMUKLtd
Posted
lyn.will Fongool
Posted
Epigenetics tells us that any chemical taken into the body in excess will alter the chemicals that control our DNA.This alteration can be passed onto our children. Craving for alcohol, or come to that a craving for anything, can be passed onto our kids. There's enough good research out there to prove that phobias are hereditary - a phobia is an emotional reaction to a certain situation. 20 years ago in New Scientist it suggested that we have our children before we indulge in heavy drinking or take drugs. We can only be a percentage of our parents whether we like it or not.
The big question that anyone should ask is 'why do we need alcohol'.
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
‘The big question that anyone should ask is “why do we need alcohol”’
?
Why do we need anything? Without being rude, this is a forum called alcohol consumption, so obviously it’s members either drink or have stopped drinking.I don’t really understand your point. Who says we should ask why we need alcohol? Fine ask yourself whatever you like, but please don’t insult my intelligence by telling me what I should or shouldn’t do.
I could go on and on, why do we need meat, fish etc etc
lyn.will vickylou
Posted
I am not suggesting that anyone gives up alcohol - it's up to them. The point I'm making is, each one of us should look at our lives and question why.
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
lyn.will vickylou
Posted
Robin2015 lyn.will
Posted
vickylou Robin2015
Posted
Basically theories on evolution. Lamark’s theories are referred to as Lamarckism, the passing on to offspring certain characteristics. Don’t know what Lamaric is, presume she means Lamarck. Lamarckism is hugely disputed
lyn.will Robin2015
Posted
Sorry a misspelling, meant to be Lamarck. He published his theory of evolution before Darwin and Darwin admits that Lamarck's theory make him think of his own theory.
Epigenetics, as you probably know, is the study of changes in DNA, many specialists in this field are coming around that Lamarck's theory was nearer the mark.
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
This correlation between Darwin and Lamarks’ theories have been discussed for years with no conclusion
IMO this forum is not the place to discuss the rights and wrongs of evolution theories.
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
Epergenetic investigation may suggest LAMARK’S theories may have some merit, but there certainly isn’t any proof that Lamarckism is right.
By the same score, there is no proof that Lamarckism is wrong. Theories are theories end of. No right or wrong.
At the end of the day you have your views and I have mine. The difference being, I’m not telling people what they should do, based on how I perceive things. It’s up to the individual what they do, whether I think they’re right or wrong. Could I point out that whilst you’re telling us what we should do and why, it could add more credence if you spelt LAMARK correctly.
I won’t be having anymore children. I’ve had three and have two grandsons, none of them have any problems with alcohol and are responsible parents. So I will continue to drink responsibly, safe in the knowledge that I’m not harming anyone.
Robin2015 vickylou
Posted
lyn.will vickylou
Posted
I'm not telling anyone what to do I'm only pointing out what the latest theories are but I think the younger generation should be aware of them and make their own minds up.The spelling of Lamark was not actually a spelling error but a typographical error. My spelling of Epergenetic WAS wrong it should, of course, be Epigenetics. I think the next 5/10 years will prove one way or the other.
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
“Each one of us should look at our lives and question why”
?
If that statement isn’t telling me (us) what to do, then I don’t know what is. What gives you the right to tell me what I should do. You don’t know me and for the last time, please don’t tell me what to dolyn.will vickylou
Posted
I'm only trying to be helpful.Perhaps may help some people.
Joanna-SMUKLtd lyn.will
Posted
The thing is, Lynn....... this is wrong place. When people write on this forum, it's BECAUSE they have a drink problem already. Like catching the horse after it has bolted.
lyn.will Joanna-SMUKLtd
Posted
Joanna-SMUKLtd lyn.will
Posted
No, offence taken, but you would've been better to research your audience first, because one very quick scan through this forum PRIOR to posting and you would've seen that there are no binge-drinking youngsters on this forum. In fact, I would suggest that the average age of most who post here are over 40 and (as I say) long, long in trouble with alcohol......
vickylou lyn.will
Posted
I appreciate that you wanted to ‘help’ but by telling me what I should do irritated me.
As Joanna has said, the people posting on here, myself included, have either had, still have or have close family with alcohol problems. So by saying we should question what we do with our bodies with regard to our alcohol intake is inappropriate.
Dont you think that by posting and admitting our struggles and problems caused by alcohol, that we haven’t questioned ourselves as to why we drink, or used to drink umpteen times already.
Lamarkism or theories about evolution would be the last thing I’d be interested in when I was drinking heavily, where going without a drink for just a day was an achievement.
Again, your views and interpretations of anything is your right, but maybe choose a more appropriate place to post them. In hindsight I probably over reacted, for the reasons I’ve already said!
lyn.will Joanna-SMUKLtd
Posted