Leflunomide vs Sulfasalazine
Posted , 8 users are following.
I'm currently taking 8.75 Preds per day and my rhematologist wants me to start on one of the above drugs witha view to 'running down' the Preds eventually. Does anyone have any experience of these drugs and if so, whether one is preferred?
0 likes, 14 replies
tina-uk_cwall combatballerina
Posted
combatballerina tina-uk_cwall
Posted
tina-uk_cwall combatballerina
Posted
don't forget you can have both PMR and RAnin which case the rheumatologist will want you on both preds and one of the drugs specifically used in the treatment of RA. Have you actually noticed a reduction in your symptoms whilst taking preds and what was your starting dose and when? Regards, tina
MrsO-UK_Surrey combatballerina
Posted
However, if you've managed to reduce down as low as 8.75 but are getting stuck there with returning symptoms, have you tried leaving longer between each very tiny reduction? It may just be that you have reduced too quickly to this stage and may have reached a 'maintenance' dose for now.
lodgerUK_NE combatballerina
Posted
These may help you, as they have helped others to reduce without resorting to additional medication which, as all medication does, their own side effects. Worth a try.
EileenH combatballerina
Posted
What may happen is that patients who respond well did not actually have PMR but LORA (late onset RA) which can appear identical to PMR in its early stages and these are all drugs used for RA so would probably achieve a good result. There was a trial using leflunomide which looked promising with 21 out of 23 achieving remission, one patient was lost to follow up. However, since then I have come across several patients who did well at first with it but later had to stop taking it because of the side effects - which, when they happen, can be considerable.
Many patients who have previously failed to reduce at the rate their doctors wanted them to - in our general opinion too fast a rate or in too big steps - have been able to reduce successfully using the slow reduction plans mentioned by lodger. Where these "steroid sparer" drugs are all associated with side effects, some quite unpleasant or serious, reducing with these slow plans have no side effects! Several rheumatologists have expressed interst and they are being used for other patients too. With success.
dan38655 combatballerina
Posted
But Eileen's report of inconclusive outcomes prevents me from taking the Rheumy's advice.
Seems to me that some patients who have PMR likely also have some RA activity intheir skeletons, so the occasional positive result from taking additional drugs would be expected.
I think these extra drugs are either/both for helping those patients with RA activity and/or are possibly an experiment of wishful thinking. Taking them makes no sense to me.
lodgerUK_NE dan38655
Posted
MrsO-UK_Surrey dan38655
Posted
The 5mg dose proves a "sticking point" for many - it did for me. But an increase to 10mg and a quick descent back down to 5 which became my maintenance dose for 5-6 months proved very successful as did my continuing reductions in just 0.5mg decrements tapering on just one day of the first week, two of the second, three of the third etc. It took an eternity to reach zero Pred, but I got there eventually 3 years ago. If you follow one of the very slow regimes, you will hopefully be successful too.
lodgerUK_NE MrsO-UK_Surrey
Posted
Two years into GCA and after two flares and still on 20mg, I was offered a steroid sparing agent - Methotextrate, being a newbie at that time, well sort of - . I asked 'what will it do' enable you to lessen the pred. I asked would it cause me to go into remission sooner - answer no, just lessen the pred. I said I would think about it and I did.
I reasoned that the trouble wass that all the steroid sparing agents come with their own side effects so I did the math, - just for Metho
Pred has 83 recorded side effects and no-one I have ever known has ever had them all - the most common ones encountered are those of the peice of paper that comes with the tablets.
Adding metho caused the side effect number to go up to just over 100. I thought, wait a minute, my body has enough to cope with, without adding more side effects that could happen.
So my answer was No thank-you. No they were not pleased but they respected my decision.
5 years from being diagnosed with GCA - remission and still counting now 4 years into remission.
SO AS I SAID - A VERY PERSONAL DECISION.
Then add the listed side effects of the steroid sparing agents.
I had GCA, as you will know
MrsO-UK_Surrey lodgerUK_NE
Posted
However, there are people who have repeated flares at higher doses of steroids in spite of trying slow tapering regimes and having other conditions ruled out. I have come across a few such people who have found that one of the DMARDs has helped them to get much lower on the steroids than before, and, in fact, we have people posting here and on other forums occasionally who say that Methotrexate, for instance, has worked for them. So I feel we can't discount it when it helps a few desperate patients to at least eventually lower their steroid dose.
EileenH dan38655
Posted
EileenH MrsO-UK_Surrey
Posted
MrsO-UK_Surrey EileenH
Posted